Correlations between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values and Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer

被引:57
作者
Kamitani, Takeshi [1 ]
Matsuo, Yoshio [1 ]
Yabuuchi, Hidetake [2 ]
Fujita, Nobuhiro [1 ]
Nagao, Michinobu [3 ]
Jinnouchi, Mikako [1 ]
Yonezawa, Masato [1 ]
Yamasaki, Yuzo [1 ]
Tokunaga, Eriko [4 ]
Kubo, Makoto [5 ]
Yamamoto, Hidetaka [6 ]
Yoshiura, Takashi [1 ]
Honda, Hiroshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Clin Radiol, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[3] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Mol Imaging & Diag, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[4] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Surg & Sci, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[5] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Surg & Oncol, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[6] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Anat Pathol, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
关键词
ADC; breast cancer; prognostic factor; INVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA; LYMPH-NODE METASTASES; FIBROTIC FOCUS; MUCINOUS CARCINOMA; ESTROGEN-RECEPTORS; TUMOR; FEATURES; THERAPY;
D O I
10.2463/mrms.2012-0095
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: We investigated possible correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and prognostic factors of breast cancer. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 81 patients who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast and were diagnosed pathologically with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) not otherwise specified with invasive foci one cm or larger. We excluded ductal carcinoma in situ and IDC with invasive foci smaller than one cm because small lesions decrease the reliability of signal intensity of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). We also excluded special type cancers. We used t-test to compare the mean ADC values of cancers of Stage pT1 (<= 2 cm) versus pT2 or 3 (>2 cm), cancers with versus without vascular invasion, axillary lymph node (N)-positive versus N-negative cancers, estrogen receptor (ER)positive versus ER-negative cancers, and progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive versus PgR-negative cancers. We analyzed correlations between the ADC value with nuclear grade (NG) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) score by rank test using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results: The mean ADC value was significantly higher for N-positive (n = 28; 0.97 +/- 0.20 x 10(-3) mm/s) than N-negative cancers (n = 53; 0.87 +/- 0.17 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P=0.017); significantly lower for ER-positive (n = 63; 0.88 +/- 0.15 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than ER-negative cancers (n = 18; 1.01 +/- 0.21 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P = 0.005); and significantly lower for PgR-positive (n = 47; 0.88 +/- 0.16 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than PgR-negative cancers (n = 34; 0.95 +/- 0.18 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P=0.048). Tumor size, vascular invasion, NG, and HER2 status showed no significant correlation with ADC values. Conclusion: ADC values were higher for N-positive and ER-negative breast cancers than N-negative and ER-positive cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 199
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Anan K, 2001, EUR J SURG ONCOL, V27, P459
[2]  
ANTONIADES K, 1979, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V71, P497
[3]  
BLACK R, 1983, CLIN ONCOL, V9, P311
[4]   Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer [J].
Bonnema, J ;
van de Velde, CJH .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (10) :1531-1537
[5]   Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer [J].
Choi, S. Y. ;
Chang, Y-W ;
Park, H. J. ;
Kim, H. J. ;
Hong, S. S. ;
Seo, D. Y. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1016) :E474-E479
[6]  
Collins Conor D, 2005, Cancer Imaging, V5 Spec No A, pS3, DOI 10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0039
[7]   Early distant relapse in 'node-negative' breast cancer patients is not predicted by occult axillary lymph node metastases, but by the features of the primary tumour [J].
Colpaert, C ;
Vermeulen, P ;
Jeuris, W ;
van Beest, P ;
Goovaerts, G ;
Weyler, J ;
Van Dam, P ;
Dirix, L ;
Van Marck, E .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2001, 193 (04) :442-449
[8]   Meeting highlights:: International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2005 [J].
Goldhirsch, A ;
Glick, JH ;
Gelber, RD ;
Coates, AS ;
Thürlimann, B ;
Senn, H ;
Albain, KS ;
Bergh, J ;
Castiglione-Gertsch, M ;
Coates, AS ;
Costa, A ;
Cuzick, J ;
Davidson, N ;
Forbes, JF ;
Gelber, RD ;
Goss, P ;
Harris, J ;
Glick, JH ;
Goldhirsch, A ;
Howell, A ;
Ingle, JN ;
Jakesz, R ;
Jassem, J ;
Kaufmann, M ;
Martin, M ;
Mauriac, L ;
Morrow, M ;
Mouridsen, HT ;
Namer, M ;
Piccart-Gebhart, MJ ;
Possinger, K ;
Pritchard, K ;
Rutgers, EJT ;
Thürlimann, B ;
Viale, G ;
Wallgren, A ;
Wood, WC .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (10) :1569-1583
[9]   Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging [J].
Guo, Y ;
Cai, YQ ;
Cai, ZL ;
Gao, YG ;
An, NY ;
Ma, L ;
Mahankali, S ;
Gao, JH .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 16 (02) :172-178
[10]   American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer [J].
Hammond, M. Elizabeth H. ;
Hayes, Daniel F. ;
Dowsett, Mitch ;
Allred, D. Craig ;
Hagerty, Karen L. ;
Badve, Sunil ;
Fitzgibbons, Patrick L. ;
Francis, Glenn ;
Goldstein, Neil S. ;
Hayes, Malcolm ;
Hicks, David G. ;
Lester, Susan ;
Love, Richard ;
Mangu, Pamela B. ;
McShane, Lisa ;
Miller, Keith ;
Osborne, C. Kent ;
Paik, Soonmyung ;
Perlmutter, Jane ;
Rhodes, Anthony ;
Sasano, Hironobu ;
Schwartz, Jared N. ;
Sweep, Fred C. G. ;
Taube, Sheila ;
Torlakovic, Emina Emilia ;
Valenstein, Paul ;
Viale, Giuseppe ;
Visscher, Daniel ;
Wheeler, Thomas ;
Williams, R. Bruce ;
Wittliff, James L. ;
Wolff, Antonio C. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (16) :2784-2795