Correlations between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values and Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer

被引:56
|
作者
Kamitani, Takeshi [1 ]
Matsuo, Yoshio [1 ]
Yabuuchi, Hidetake [2 ]
Fujita, Nobuhiro [1 ]
Nagao, Michinobu [3 ]
Jinnouchi, Mikako [1 ]
Yonezawa, Masato [1 ]
Yamasaki, Yuzo [1 ]
Tokunaga, Eriko [4 ]
Kubo, Makoto [5 ]
Yamamoto, Hidetaka [6 ]
Yoshiura, Takashi [1 ]
Honda, Hiroshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Clin Radiol, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[3] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Mol Imaging & Diag, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[4] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Surg & Sci, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[5] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Surg & Oncol, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[6] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Anat Pathol, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
关键词
ADC; breast cancer; prognostic factor; INVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA; LYMPH-NODE METASTASES; FIBROTIC FOCUS; MUCINOUS CARCINOMA; ESTROGEN-RECEPTORS; TUMOR; FEATURES; THERAPY;
D O I
10.2463/mrms.2012-0095
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: We investigated possible correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and prognostic factors of breast cancer. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 81 patients who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast and were diagnosed pathologically with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) not otherwise specified with invasive foci one cm or larger. We excluded ductal carcinoma in situ and IDC with invasive foci smaller than one cm because small lesions decrease the reliability of signal intensity of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). We also excluded special type cancers. We used t-test to compare the mean ADC values of cancers of Stage pT1 (<= 2 cm) versus pT2 or 3 (>2 cm), cancers with versus without vascular invasion, axillary lymph node (N)-positive versus N-negative cancers, estrogen receptor (ER)positive versus ER-negative cancers, and progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive versus PgR-negative cancers. We analyzed correlations between the ADC value with nuclear grade (NG) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) score by rank test using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results: The mean ADC value was significantly higher for N-positive (n = 28; 0.97 +/- 0.20 x 10(-3) mm/s) than N-negative cancers (n = 53; 0.87 +/- 0.17 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P=0.017); significantly lower for ER-positive (n = 63; 0.88 +/- 0.15 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than ER-negative cancers (n = 18; 1.01 +/- 0.21 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P = 0.005); and significantly lower for PgR-positive (n = 47; 0.88 +/- 0.16 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than PgR-negative cancers (n = 34; 0.95 +/- 0.18 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P=0.048). Tumor size, vascular invasion, NG, and HER2 status showed no significant correlation with ADC values. Conclusion: ADC values were higher for N-positive and ER-negative breast cancers than N-negative and ER-positive cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 199
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Associations Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values and the Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer
    Choi, Bo Bae
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2019, 43 (06) : 931 - 936
  • [2] Association between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values on Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer
    Ng, W. K.
    Wong, C. K. K.
    Fung, E. P. Y.
    Wong, C. W.
    Mak, W. S.
    Kwok, K. M.
    Lam, H. S.
    Cho, H. Y.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 22 (02): : 98 - 106
  • [3] Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer characterisation: correlations between the apparent diffusion coefficient and major prognostic factors
    Paolo Belli
    Melania Costantini
    Enida Bufi
    Giuseppe Giovanni Giardina
    Pierluigi Rinaldi
    Gianluca Franceschini
    Lorenzo Bonomo
    La radiologia medica, 2015, 120 : 268 - 276
  • [4] Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer characterisation: correlations between the apparent diffusion coefficient and major prognostic factors
    Belli, Paolo
    Costantini, Melania
    Bufi, Enida
    Giardina, Giuseppe Giovanni
    Rinaldi, Pierluigi
    Franceschini, Gianluca
    Bonomo, Lorenzo
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2015, 120 (03): : 268 - 276
  • [5] The Relationship between Breast Cancer Subtypes, Prognostic Factors, and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis
    Aktas, Elif
    Seber, Tugba Uylar
    Seber, Turgut
    Burcek, Nihan Vasfiye
    Akay, Ebru
    Arslan, Alaettin
    Eren, Saliha Karagoz
    Ozhan, Nail
    Bilgin, Ezel Yaltirik
    Savran, Burcu
    Akdur, Pinar
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 20
  • [6] Correlation of Shear-Wave Elastography and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Breast Cancer and Their Relationship with the Prognostic Factors
    Orguc, Sebnem
    Acar, Cagdas Riza
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [7] Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values and histopathology classification of breast invasive ductal carcinoma
    Zhang, Wei
    Jin, Guanqiao
    Liu, Junjie
    Huang, Xiangyang
    Kang, Wei
    Xie, Dong
    Luo, Ningbin
    Su, Danke
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (02): : 3111 - 3117
  • [8] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Breast Cancer: Correlation of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value with Prognostic Factors
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Cha, Eun Suk
    Kim, Hyeon Sook
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Choi, Jae Jeong
    Jung, Ji Han
    Park, Yong Gyu
    Suh, Young Jin
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (03) : 615 - 620
  • [9] Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Ratio as Prognostic Factors for Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness
    Buss, Arvids
    Radzina, Maija
    Liepa, Mara
    Birkenfelds, Edgars
    Saule, Laura
    Miculis, Karlis
    Mikelsone, Madara
    Vjaters, Egils
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (21)
  • [10] Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer
    Choi, S. Y.
    Chang, Y-W
    Park, H. J.
    Kim, H. J.
    Hong, S. S.
    Seo, D. Y.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1016): : E474 - E479