Comparative analyses of estimated and calorimetrically determined energy balance in high-yielding dairy cows

被引:10
作者
Erdmann, S. [1 ]
Derno, M. [2 ]
Schaeff, C. T. [2 ]
Boerner, S. [2 ]
Kautzsch, U. [2 ]
Kuhla, B. [2 ]
Hammon, H. M. [2 ]
Tuchscherer, A. [3 ]
Roentgen, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Farm Anim Biol FBN, Inst Muscle Biol & Growth, Wilhelm Stahl Allee 2, D-18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
[2] Leibniz Inst Farm Anim Biol FBN, Inst Nutr Physiol Oskar Kellner, Wilhelm Stahl Allee 2, D-18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
[3] Leibniz Inst Farm Anim Biol FBN, Inst Genet & Biometry, Wilhelm Stahl Allee 2, D-18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
关键词
heat production; maintenance requirement; respiration chamber; dairy cow; BODY-FAT MOBILIZATION; HEAT-PRODUCTION; MILK-PRODUCTION; HOLSTEIN COWS; FEED-INTAKE; HORMONE CONCENTRATIONS; GLUCOSE-METABOLISM; GENE-EXPRESSION; PLASMA GHRELIN; MAJOR ADVANCES;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2018-15017
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Our aim was to compare the energy balance estimated (EBest) according to equations published by various energy feeding systems (German Society for Nutrition Physiology, French National Institute for Agricultural Research, and US National Research Council) and the EB calculated by use of calorimetrically measured heat production (EBhp) of 20 high-yielding (>= 10,000 kg/305 d) German Holstein cows at -4 (pregnant, nonlactating) and 2 wk (early lactation) relative to parturition. In addition to heat production, feed and water intake, physical activity (including standing-lying behavior), body weight, body condition score, body temperature, plasma concentrations of fatty acids and beta-hydroxybutyrate, milk yield, and milk composition were measured to characterize the metabolic status. The EBhp was balanced [2.74 +/- 4.09 MJ of metabolizable energy (ME)/d; +/- standard error] before calving, but strongly negative (-84.7 +/- 7.48 MJ of ME/d) at wk 2 of lactation. At both time points, EBhp and EBest differed significantly. On average, the equations overestimated the antepartum EB by 33 MJ of ME/d and underestimated the postpartum negative EB by 67 MJ of ME/d, respectively. Because the same ME intake and energy-corrected milk values were used for calculation of EBest and EBhp in our study, we considered that the factors (0.488 to 0.534 MJ of ME/kg(0.75)) currently used to calculate the ME requirements for maintenance probably underestimate the needs of high-yielding dairy cows, particularly during early lactation. In accord, heat production values determined under standard conditions of thermoneutrality and locomotion restriction amounted to 0.76 +/- 0.02 MJ of ME/kg(0.75) (4 wk antepartum) and 1.02 +/- 0.02 MJ of ME/kg(0.75) (2 wk postpartum), respectively. The expected positive correlation between EBhp and DMI was observed in pregnant cows only; however, a bias of 26 MJ of ME/d between mean actual energy intake and ME intake predicted according to German Society for Nutrition Physiology was found in cows at wk 4 antepartum. At both investigated time points, mobilization of tissue energy reserves (reflected by plasma fatty acid concentration) was related to EBhp. In early lactating cows, metabolic body weight (kg(0.75)) and the percentage of milk fat showed the strongest correlation (correlation coefficient = -0.70 and -0.73) to EBhp. Our findings must be taken into account when experimental data are interpreted because the true energy status might be significantly overestimated when EBest is used.
引用
收藏
页码:4002 / 4013
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prepartum and postpartum nutritional management to optimize fertility in high-yielding dairy cows in confined TMR systems
    Drackley, J. K.
    Cardoso, F. C.
    ANIMAL, 2014, 8 : 5 - 14
  • [32] Performance and welfare of high-yielding dairy cows subjected to 5 or 8 cooling sessions daily under hot and humid climate
    Honig, H.
    Miron, J.
    Lehrer, H.
    Jackoby, S.
    Zachut, M.
    Zinou, A.
    Portnick, Y.
    Moallem, U.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2012, 95 (07) : 3736 - 3742
  • [33] Influence of the addition of water to total mixed rations on the feeding behaviour, feed intake and milk performance of high-yielding dairy cows
    Denissen, J.
    Beintmann, S.
    Hoppe, S.
    Pries, M.
    Hummel, J.
    Suedekum, K-H
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2021, 254
  • [34] Whole lactation production responses in high-yielding dairy cows using high-quality grass/clover silage
    Patel, Mikaela
    Wredle, Ewa
    Sporndly, Eva
    Bertilsson, Jan
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2017, 97 (09) : 2883 - 2890
  • [35] Performance and metabolic and endocrine changes with emphasis on glucose metabolism in high-yielding dairy cows with high and low fat content in liver after calving
    Hammon, H. M.
    Stuermer, G.
    Schneider, F.
    Tuchscherer, A.
    Blum, H.
    Engelhard, T.
    Genzel, A.
    Staufenbiel, R.
    Kanitz, W.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2009, 92 (04) : 1554 - 1566
  • [36] The Effect of Body Energy Reserve Mobilization on the Fatty Acid Profile of Milk in High-yielding Cows
    Nogalski, Zenon
    Wronski, Marek
    Sobczuk-Szul, Monika
    Mochol, Magdalena
    Pogorzelska, Paulina
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2012, 25 (12): : 1712 - 1720
  • [37] Metabolic changes in follicular fluid of the dominant follicle in high-yielding dairy cows early post partum.
    Leroy, JLMR
    Vanholder, T
    Delanghe, JR
    Opsomer, G
    Van Soom, A
    Bols, PEJ
    Dewulf, J
    de Kruif, A
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 2004, 62 (06) : 1131 - 1143
  • [38] Production diseases with a genetic disposition 1st Communication: Ketosis susceptibility of high-yielding dairy cows
    Brade, Wilfried
    TIERAERZTLICHE UMSCHAU, 2018, 73 (04) : 114 - 122
  • [39] Effects of live yeast on milk yield, feed efficiency, methane emissions and fertility of high-yielding dairy cows
    Garnsworthy, P. C.
    Saunders, N.
    Goodman, J. R.
    Algherair, I. H.
    Ambrose, J. D.
    ANIMAL, 2025, 19 (01)
  • [40] THE ROLE OF ENERGY BALANCE AND METABOLISM ON REPRODUCTION OF DAIRY COWS
    Butler, W. R.
    2012 CORNELL NUTRITION CONFERENCE FOR FEED MANUFACTURERS, PROCEEDINGS, 2012, : 97 - 106