Impact disruption of primordial planetesimals

被引:4
|
作者
Gabriela Parisi, M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, CCT La Plata, Inst Argentino Radioastron, RA-1894 Villa Elisa, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Univ Nacl La Plata, Fac Ciencias Astron & Geofis, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
Solar System formation; Planetesimals; Accretion; KUIPER-BELT OBJECTS; MAIN ASTEROID BELT; N-BODY SIMULATION; SOLAR NEBULA; STREAMING INSTABILITIES; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; GIANT PLANETS; ACCRETION; GROWTH; DISKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pss.2012.09.013
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
It is usually assumed that 1-10-km-sized planetesimals are formed through coagulation processes and continue to agglomerate via pairwise mergers. However, recent models of planetesimal formation suggest that planetesimals of 100-1000 km were produced directly from small solid particles without experiencing accretion through intermediate sizes. At present, if planetesimals were born small or big is a matter of debate. We investigate if planetesimals in the range 10-1000 km suffer growth or disruption as they collide. The collisional energy required for disruption is computed as a function of the planetesimals radius and velocity in terms of their orbital semiaxis and eccentricity. We obtain that growth of planetesimals of similar to 10-100 km in the asteroid belt and the Kuiper belt requires eccentricities much lower than what we observe today. Simulations of accretion in the terrestrial and giant planets region show that planetesimals of 10-100 km reach values of the eccentricity which lie at the disruption eccentricity limit obtained in this work. We obtain that planetesimals growth requires a very cold disk during all the accretionary process, which seems to be difficult to achieve. We conclude that large planetesimals may be formed either invoking modern scenarios of gravitational instability or by accreting small bodies only. Planetesimals of intermediate sizes would then be the result of disruption events. We obtain that accretion requires an impactor target mass ratio smaller than 0.1-0.01. This implies that the exponent q of the power law mass distribution of bodies must be greater than two during all the planetary formation process. However, if during oligarchic growth a bimodal mass distribution of small and large bodies exists, the mass distribution of small bodies allows q < 2 provided the mass ratio between the largest body of such distribution and the smallest body of the distribution of large planetesimals is smaller than similar to 0.1-0.01. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 104
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CONGLOMERATION OF KILOMETER-SIZED PLANETESIMALS
    Shannon, Andrew
    Wu, Yanqin
    Lithwick, Yoram
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 801 (01)
  • [22] On the Formation of Planetesimals: Radial Contraction of the Dust Layer Interacting with the Protoplanetary Disk Gas
    Makalkin, A. B.
    Artyushkova, M. E.
    SOLAR SYSTEM RESEARCH, 2017, 51 (06) : 491 - 526
  • [23] Composition of giant planets: The roles of pebbles and planetesimals
    Danti, C.
    Bitsch, B.
    Mah, J.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2023, 679
  • [24] What was the Volatile Composition of the Planetesimals that Formed the Earth?
    Joseph A. Nuth
    Earth, Moon, and Planets, 2008, 102 : 435 - 445
  • [25] What was the volatile composition of the planetesimals that formed the Earth?
    Nuth, Joseph A., III
    EARTH MOON AND PLANETS, 2008, 102 (1-4): : 435 - 445
  • [26] Abundances of Ordinary Chondrites in Thermally Evolving Planetesimals
    Wakita, Shigeru
    Hasegawa, Yasuhiro
    Nozawa, Takaya
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 863 (01)
  • [27] Thermal evolution and differentiation of planetesimals and planetary embryos
    Sramek, Ondrej
    Milelli, Laura
    Ricard, Yanick
    Labrosse, Stephane
    ICARUS, 2012, 217 (01) : 339 - 354
  • [28] The impact of Lyman a trapping on the formation of primordial objects
    Latif, M. A.
    Zaroubi, S.
    Spaans, M.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 411 (03) : 1659 - 1670
  • [29] Testing the Jeans, Toomre, and Bonnor-Ebert Concepts for Planetesimal Formation: 3D Streaming-instability Simulations of Diffusion-regulated Formation of Planetesimals
    Klahr, Hubert
    Schreiber, Andreas
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 911 (01)
  • [30] The outcome of protoplanetary dust growth: pebbles, boulders, or planetesimals? II. Introducing the bouncing barrier
    Zsom, A.
    Ormel, C. W.
    Guettler, C.
    Blum, J.
    Dullemond, C. P.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2010, 513