Interplanetary shock-bow shock interaction: Comparison of a global MHD model and observation

被引:8
|
作者
Goncharov, O. [1 ]
Safrankova, J. [1 ]
Nemecek, Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Math & Phys, CR-18000 Prague 8, Czech Republic
关键词
Interplanetary shocks; Discontinuities; MHD simulations; IMF rotation; Bow shock; Magnetosheath; SOLAR-WIND SHOCK; EARTHS MAGNETOSPHERE; MAGNETOSHEATH; MAGNETOPAUSE; WAVES; FLOW; DISCONTINUITIES; PROPAGATION; PARALLEL; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.pss.2014.12.001
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
A fast forward shock passing through the bow shock would generate a train of new discontinuities that differ with the distance from the Sun-Earth line. However, interplanetary (IP) shocks are often followed by a rotation of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) over a large angle and a presence of this rotation can modify the interaction process. The present paper analyzes in detail one IP shock where data measured by Wind are used as an input to a global BATS-R-US MHD model and the model prediction is compared with Geotail magnetosheath observations. The study is based on three runs of the global MHD model that use different modifications of upstream conditions. We have found that (1) about 45% of IP shocks is followed by a significant IMF rotation within 15 min after the shock ramp; (2) the IMF rotation modifies the dynamics of the magnetospheric response to the IP shock arrival; (3) a train of new discontinuities created by an interaction of the IP shock with bow shock can be identified in MHD simulations as well as in the experimental data; and (4) a new discontinuity is created by the interaction of the IMF rotation with the bow shock. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 11
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improved bow shock model with dependence on the IMF strength
    Jeráb, M
    Nemecek, Z
    Safránková, J
    Jelínek, K
    Merka, J
    PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2005, 53 (1-3) : 85 - 93
  • [32] MMS Observation of Shock-Reflected He++ at Earth's Quasi-Perpendicular Bow Shock
    Broll, Jeffrey Michael
    Fuselier, S. A.
    Trattner, K. J.
    Schwartz, S. J.
    Burch, J. L.
    Giles, B. L.
    Anderson, B. J.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 45 (01) : 49 - 55
  • [33] Global-scale simulation of foreshock structures at the quasi-parallel bow shock
    Lin, Y
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2003, 108 (A11)
  • [34] ANALYTICAL MODEL OF THE PLANETARY BOW SHOCK FOR VARIOUS MAGNETIC FIELD DIRECTIONS BASED ON MHD CALCULATIONS
    Kotova, G. A.
    Verigin, M., I
    Gombosi, T.
    Kabin, K.
    SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2020, 6 (04): : 44 - 49
  • [35] Earth's Bow Shock: A New Three-Dimensional Asymmetric Model With Dipole Tilt Effects
    Lu, J. Y.
    Zhou, Y.
    Ma, X.
    Wang, M.
    Kabin, K.
    Yuan, H. Z.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2019, 124 (07) : 5396 - 5407
  • [36] Earth's bow shock and magnetopause in the case of a field-aligned upstream flow:: Observation and model comparison -: art. no. 1269
    Merka, J
    Szabo, A
    Safránková, J
    Nemecek, Z
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2003, 108 (A7)
  • [37] Observation of ponderomotively driven bow shock using Thomson scattering
    Milder, A. L.
    Bruulsema, C.
    Huller, S.
    Walsh, C.
    Rozmus, W.
    Yin, L.
    Ludwig, J.
    Farmer, W. A.
    Albright, B. J.
    Rose, H. A.
    Swadling, G.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH, 2025, 7 (01):
  • [38] Collision of an interplanetary rotational discontinuity with the Earth’s bow shock. Hydrodynamic parameters and magnetic field
    E. A. Pushkar
    Fluid Dynamics, 2015, 50 : 137 - 152
  • [39] The dipole tilt angle dependence of the bow shock for southward IMF: MHD results
    Wang, M.
    Lu, J. Y.
    Yuan, H. Z.
    Kabin, K.
    Liu, Z. -Q.
    Zhao, M. X.
    Li, G.
    PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2015, 106 : 99 - 107
  • [40] A statistical comparison of interplanetary shock and CME propagation models
    Cho, KS
    Moon, YJ
    Dryer, M
    Fry, CD
    Park, YD
    Kim, KS
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2003, 108 (A12)