Spatiotemporal analysis for investment efficiency of China's rural water conservancy based on DEA model and Malmquist productivity index model

被引:29
作者
Yan, Jingning [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Hydropower Engn, Xikang Rd 1, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Hangkong Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Fenghenan Rd 696, Nanchang 330063, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Rural water conservancy; Investment efficiency; Spatiotemporal analysis; China; Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Malmquist productivity index (MPI); DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; INFRASTRUCTURE; CONSTRUCTION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.suscom.2018.11.004
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Rural water conservancy is crucial to the development of agriculture which is the foundation of national economy in China. During the period of the 12th Five-Year Plan from 2011 to 2015, Chinese government promoted the rural water conservancy investment vigorously and obtained some achievements. Meanwhile, there were some problems faced in the rural water conservancy such as a weak foundation of rural water conservancy, an uneven distribution of rural water resources by time and space, low investment efficiency. Therefore, the investment efficiency of rural water conservancy needs to be systematically and comprehensively evaluated, and the evaluation results for the period of the 12th Five-Year Plan from 2011 to 2015 can provide reliable references for China's rural water conservancy investment over the period of the 13th Five-Year Plan from 2016 to 2020. Based on the existing study findings, this study conductes the empirical analysis for the investment efficiency of China's rural water conservancy during the period of 2011 to 2015 using the data envelopment analysis (DEA) model and Malmquist productivity index (MPI) model from the spatiotemporal perspective. The statistical data of the 31 provinces over the period of 2011 to 2015 are gathered as inputs and outputs of the DEA model and MPI model. It finds that the average investment efficiency of China's rural water conservancy in each year during the study period is 0.732 and the investment efficiency fluctuates for the same period, which is mainly caused by scale efficiency (SE). The investment efficiency of China's rural water conservancy is decreased by an average of 1.2% from 2011 to 2015, which is principally due to technology change (TC). From the regional aspect, the investment efficiency of rural water conservancy in the eastern, central, northeast and western regions increase successively, which means uneven distribution of investment efficiency among the four regions. Based on the MPI analysis of the four regions, only the investment efficiency of eastern region improved by an average of 4.3% for each year, while the investment efficiency of the other three regions all decreased. At the provincial level, disequilibrium in the investment efficiency of rural water conservancy existed in the 31 provinces. Only the four provinces including Shanghai, Hainan, Tibet and Xinjiang were DEA efficiency for each year during the study period. The improvement of the investment efficiency among the 31 provinces in China mainly relied on the investment expansion and the technology innovation of rural water conservancy. Furthermore, the method provided in this study can be not only used to analyze the investment efficiency of rural water conservancy in other developing countries, but also to evaluate the investment efficiency of the other fields in the time and space dimensions. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 71
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Performance Evaluation Model Using FAHP/DEA and the Malmquist Productivity Index to Assess the Photovoltaics Industry in Taiwan
    Lee, Amy H. I.
    Kang, He-Yau
    Lin, Chun-Yu
    JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION, 2014, 42 (01) : 211 - 228
  • [22] Determining the Efficiency of the Sponge City Construction Pilots in China Based on the DEA-Malmquist Model
    Zhang, Heng
    Chang, Qian
    Li, Sui
    Huang, Jiandong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (18)
  • [23] Multi-criteria decision analysis of China's energy security from 2008 to 2017 based on Fuzzy BWM-DEA-AR model and Malmquist Productivity Index
    Huang, Beijia
    Zhang, Long
    Ma, Linmao
    Bai, Wuliyasu
    Ren, Jingzheng
    ENERGY, 2021, 228
  • [24] Evaluation of Water Resources Utilization Efficiency in Guangdong Province Based on the DEA-Malmquist Model
    Cheng, Lifen
    Song, Song
    Xie, Yufeng
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [25] Provincial water use efficiency measurement and factor analysis in China: Based on SBM-DEA model
    Deng, Guangyao
    Li, Lu
    Song, Yanan
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 69 : 12 - 18
  • [26] An economic-efficiency analysis of water conservancy investment in Heilongjiang Province based on projection pursuit clustering and DEA models
    Fu, Qiang
    Guo, Jia
    Cui, Song
    Li, Tianxiao
    Liu, Dong
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-WATER SUPPLY, 2017, 17 (06): : 1579 - 1588
  • [27] China's regional environmental efficiency evaluation: a dynamic analysis with biennial Malmquist productivity index based on common weights
    Zhu, Weiwei
    Zhu, Yaqin
    Yu, Yu
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (32) : 39726 - 39741
  • [28] Analysis of Medical Health System Based on Game Cross-Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Model and Global Malmquist Index
    Yu, Jinna
    Zhang, Tingting
    Ning, Youliang
    Lu, Lu
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2020, 10 (09) : 2053 - 2061
  • [29] Water Use Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors in China: Based on the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-Tobit Model
    Wang, Shuqiao
    Zhou, Li
    Wang, Hui
    Li, Xiaocong
    WATER, 2018, 10 (07)
  • [30] Efficiency and Productivity Growth of Technology-Based Firms in Business Incubators: A DEA and Malmquist Index Approach
    Santos, J.
    Grilo, A.
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM 2013), 2013, : 154 - 158