Comparison of a nucleoprotein gene based RT-PCR with real time RT-PCR for diagnosis of avian influenza in clinical specimens

被引:5
作者
Nagarajan, S. [1 ]
Murugkar, H. V. [1 ]
Tosh, C. [1 ]
Behera, P. [1 ]
Khandia, R. [1 ]
Jain, R. [1 ]
Katare, M. [1 ]
Syed, Z. [1 ]
Tripati, S. [1 ]
Dubey, S. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Vet Res Inst, High Secur Anim Dis Lab, Bhopal 462021, Madhya Pradesh, India
关键词
Avian influenza virus; NP gene; RT-PCR; Real time RT-PCR; Virus isolation; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION-PCR; A VIRUS; HIGH AGREEMENT; LOW KAPPA; INDIA; H5N1; PARADOXES; SUBTYPES; POULTRY; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.06.005
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
A nucleoprotein (NP) gene based reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (npRT-PCR) assay was developed in our laboratory which could detect 35.09% of the experimental samples negative for virus isolation in first passage but positive by third passage. Reducing the reaction volume to 12.5 mu l did not alter the test sensitivity and the results did not vary when duplicate samples were run in a different thermal cycler. The positive and negative agreements of this test in clinical specimens were compared with a matrix gene based real time RT-PCR with virus isolation as standard. A total of 516 clinical specimens including tissues, swabs and feces submitted from various States of India as part of active surveillance for avian influenza were tested by npRT-PCR, RRT-PCR and virus isolation in 9-11 day old embryonated specific pathogen free chicken eggs. The positive and negative agreements of npRT-PCR with virus isolation were found to be 0.909 +/- 0.022 and 0.980 +/- 0.004 respectively and that of RRT-PCR with virus isolation were 0.902 +/- 0.023 and 0.977 +/- 0.005 respectively. Since the positive and negative agreements of both npRT-PCR and RRT-PCR tests were similar, we suggest that this test can be used by peripheral veterinary laboratories that do not have real time PCR facility for active surveillance of AIV. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 507
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Boon ACM, 2001, J MED VIROL, V65, P163, DOI 10.1002/jmv.2016
[2]   False-positive results obtained by following a commonly used reverse transcription-PCR protocol for detection of influenza a virus [J].
Busquets-Marti, Nuria ;
Serrano-Del Pozo, Erika ;
Alba-Casals, Ana ;
Nunez-Garrote, Jose Ignacio ;
Majo-Masferrer, Natalia .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 44 (10) :3845-3845
[3]   HIGH AGREEMENT BUT LOW KAPPA .2. RESOLVING THE PARADOXES [J].
CICCHETTI, DV ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (06) :551-558
[4]  
*DADF, 2006, ACT PLAN AN HUSB PRE, P1
[5]   HIGH AGREEMENT BUT LOW KAPPA .1. THE PROBLEMS OF 2 PARADOXES [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
CICCHETTI, DV .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (06) :543-549
[6]   Detection of influenza A viruses from different species by PCR amplification of conserved sequences in the matrix gene [J].
Fouchier, RAM ;
Bestebroer, TM ;
Herfst, S ;
Van der Kemp, L ;
Rimmelzwaan, GF ;
Osterhaus, ADME .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 38 (11) :4096-4101
[7]   Characterization of a novel influenza a virus hemagglutinin subtype (H16) obtained from black-headed gulls [J].
Fouchier, RAM ;
Munster, V ;
Wallensten, A ;
Bestebroer, TM ;
Herfst, S ;
Smith, D ;
Rimmelzwaan, GF ;
Olsen, B ;
Osterhaus, ADME .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 2005, 79 (05) :2814-2822
[8]   Simultaneous detection and typing of influenza viruses A and B by a nested reverse transcription-PCR: Comparison to virus isolation and antigen detection by immunofluorescence and optical immunoassay (FLU OIA) [J].
Herrmann, B ;
Larsson, C ;
Zweygberg, BW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (01) :134-138
[9]   Identification and subtyping of avian influenza viruses by reverse transcription-PCR [J].
Lee, MS ;
Chang, PC ;
Shien, JH ;
Cheng, MC ;
Shieh, HK .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2001, 97 (1-2) :13-22
[10]   A spreadsheet for the calculation of comprehensive statistics for the assessment of diagnostic tests and inter-rater agreement [J].
Mackinnon, A .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2000, 30 (03) :127-134