Discriminating glioblastoma from solitary brain metastases on 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: the roles of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity

被引:1
|
作者
Nguyen, D. -H. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
LE, T. -D. [2 ,3 ]
Nguyen, H. -V. [1 ]
Nguyen-Thi, V. -A. [1 ]
Dong-Van, H. [5 ]
Nguyen, M. -D. [6 ]
机构
[1] Hanoi Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Viet Duc Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hanoi, Vietnam
[3] Vietnam Natl Univ, VNU Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Radiol, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] Ha Dong Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hanoi, Vietnam
[5] Viet Duc Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Hanoi, Vietnam
[6] Pham Ngoc Thach Univ Med, Dept Radiol, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
关键词
Diffusion tensor imaging; Glioblastoma; Solitary brain metastases; Magnetic resonance imaging; 3; Tesla; HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS; DIFFERENTIATION; TUMORS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: This study deter-mined the diagnostic value of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequences using fractional anisot-ropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) for discrim-inating glioblastoma (GBM) from solitary brain metastases (SBM) using 3 Tesla magnetic reso-nance imaging (MRI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted, including 40 patients who underwent biopsy or surgery and received a histological diagnosis of GBM or SBM between August 2020 and December 2021. All preoper-ative examinations were performed on 3 Tesla MRI using conventional and DTI sequences. Three regions of interest (ROIs) were placed to measure a solid tumor component, peritumoral edema, and the opposite normal white matter to evaluate FA and MD values. Parametric and nonparametric statistical tests were used to determine differences between GBM and SBM. The diagnostic value of significantly different parameters between the two tumor entities was analyzed using the receiver operating character-istic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The FA value for peritumoral ede-ma (eFA) in GBM cases was significantly larger than that in SBM cases (p < 0.05), with no sig-nificant difference in MD values. The FA and MD values for the solid tumor component (sFA and sMD, respectively) and the ratio of the sFA value to the FA value of the opposite normal white mat-ter (rFAs/n) in GBM cases were significantly larg-er than those in SBM cases (p < 0.05). Combining the sFA and sMD values provided the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.96, with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 85.2%, 100%, 85.2%, and 87.1%, respectively, for distin-guishing GBM from SBM. CONCLUSIONS: MRI parameters, including sFA, sMD, eFA, and rFAs/n, are useful for differ-entiating between GBM and SBM. The combina-tion of sFA and sMD may increase the diagnostic performance of MRI for these two tumor entities.
引用
收藏
页码:8823 / 8831
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Stereotaxic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Atlases for Infants from 3 to 12 Months
    Fillmore, Paul T.
    Richards, John E.
    Phillips-Meek, Michelle C.
    Cryer, Alison
    Stevens, Michael
    DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 37 (06) : 515 - 532
  • [42] Diagnostic Value of Fractal Analysis for the Differentiation of Brain Tumors Using 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging
    Di Ieva, Antonio
    Le Reste, Pierre-Jean
    Carsin-Nicol, Beatrice
    Ferre, Jean-Christophe
    Cusimano, Michael D.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 79 (06) : 839 - 845
  • [43] Single-voxel and multi-voxel spectroscopy yield comparable results in the normal juvenile canine brain when using 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
    Lee, Alison M.
    Beasley, Michaela J.
    Barrett, Emerald D.
    James, Judy R.
    Gambino, Jennifer M.
    VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2018, 59 (05) : 577 - 586
  • [44] Brain tumor enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging - Comparison of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at 1.5 versus 3 Tesla
    Biswas, J
    Nelson, CB
    Runge, VM
    Wintersperger, BJ
    Baumann, SS
    Jackson, CB
    Patel, T
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2005, 40 (12) : 792 - 797
  • [45] Three-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Deep Brain Stimulators: Results From a Phantom Study and a Pilot Study in Patients
    Davidson, Benjamin
    Tam, Fred
    Yang, Benson
    Meng, Ying
    Hamani, Clement
    Graham, Simon J.
    Lipsman, Nir
    NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 88 (02) : 349 - 355
  • [46] An Integrated Radiomics Model Incorporating Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and 18F-FDG PET Imaging Improves the Performance of Differentiating Glioblastoma From Solitary Brain Metastases
    Zhang, Liqiang
    Yao, Rui
    Gao, Jueni
    Tan, Duo
    Yang, Xinyi
    Wen, Ming
    Wang, Jie
    Xie, Xiangxian
    Liao, Ruikun
    Tang, Yao
    Chen, Shanxiong
    Li, Yongmei
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [47] Differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme from metastatic brain tumor using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion and perfusion metrics at 3 T
    Tsougos, Ioannis
    Svolos, Patricia
    Kousi, Evanthia
    Fountas, Konstantinos
    Theodorou, Kyriaki
    Fezoulidis, Ioannis
    Kapsalaki, Eftychia
    CANCER IMAGING, 2012, 12 (03): : 423 - 436
  • [48] Global fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity together with segmented brain volumes assemble a predictive discriminant model for young and elderly healthy brains: a pilot study at 3T
    Garcia-Lazaro, Haydee Guadalupe
    Becerra-Laparra, Lvonne
    Cortez-Conradis, David
    Roldan-Valadez, Ernesto
    FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGY, 2016, 31 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [49] Lipid and Macromolecules Quantitation in Differentiating Glioblastoma From Solitary Metastasis: A Short-Echo Time Single-Voxel Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study at 3 T
    Crisi, Girolamo
    Orsingher, Laura
    Filice, Silvano
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 37 (02) : 265 - 271
  • [50] Imaging central veins in brain lesions with 3-T T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging differentiates multiple sclerosis from microangiopathic brain lesions
    Mistry, Niraj
    Abdel-Fahim, Rasha
    Samaraweera, Amal
    Mougin, Olivier
    Tallantyre, Emma
    Tench, Christopher
    Jaspan, Tim
    Morris, Peter
    Morgan, Paul S.
    Evangelou, Nikos
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (10) : 1289 - 1296