Discriminating glioblastoma from solitary brain metastases on 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: the roles of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity

被引:1
|
作者
Nguyen, D. -H. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
LE, T. -D. [2 ,3 ]
Nguyen, H. -V. [1 ]
Nguyen-Thi, V. -A. [1 ]
Dong-Van, H. [5 ]
Nguyen, M. -D. [6 ]
机构
[1] Hanoi Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Viet Duc Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hanoi, Vietnam
[3] Vietnam Natl Univ, VNU Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Radiol, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] Ha Dong Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hanoi, Vietnam
[5] Viet Duc Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Hanoi, Vietnam
[6] Pham Ngoc Thach Univ Med, Dept Radiol, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
关键词
Diffusion tensor imaging; Glioblastoma; Solitary brain metastases; Magnetic resonance imaging; 3; Tesla; HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS; DIFFERENTIATION; TUMORS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: This study deter-mined the diagnostic value of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequences using fractional anisot-ropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) for discrim-inating glioblastoma (GBM) from solitary brain metastases (SBM) using 3 Tesla magnetic reso-nance imaging (MRI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted, including 40 patients who underwent biopsy or surgery and received a histological diagnosis of GBM or SBM between August 2020 and December 2021. All preoper-ative examinations were performed on 3 Tesla MRI using conventional and DTI sequences. Three regions of interest (ROIs) were placed to measure a solid tumor component, peritumoral edema, and the opposite normal white matter to evaluate FA and MD values. Parametric and nonparametric statistical tests were used to determine differences between GBM and SBM. The diagnostic value of significantly different parameters between the two tumor entities was analyzed using the receiver operating character-istic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The FA value for peritumoral ede-ma (eFA) in GBM cases was significantly larger than that in SBM cases (p < 0.05), with no sig-nificant difference in MD values. The FA and MD values for the solid tumor component (sFA and sMD, respectively) and the ratio of the sFA value to the FA value of the opposite normal white mat-ter (rFAs/n) in GBM cases were significantly larg-er than those in SBM cases (p < 0.05). Combining the sFA and sMD values provided the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.96, with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 85.2%, 100%, 85.2%, and 87.1%, respectively, for distin-guishing GBM from SBM. CONCLUSIONS: MRI parameters, including sFA, sMD, eFA, and rFAs/n, are useful for differ-entiating between GBM and SBM. The combina-tion of sFA and sMD may increase the diagnostic performance of MRI for these two tumor entities.
引用
收藏
页码:8823 / 8831
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance perfusion and spectroscopy in distinguishing glioblastoma from solitary brain metastasis
    Hung, Nguyen Duy
    Van Dung, Le
    Vi, Nguyen Ha
    Anh, Nguyen-Thi Hai
    Phuong, Le-Thi Hong
    Hieu, Nguyen Dinh
    Duc, Nguyen Minh
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL IMAGING SCIENCE, 2023, 13
  • [2] Applying protein-based amide proton transfer MR imaging to distinguish solitary brain metastases from glioblastoma
    Yu, Hao
    Lou, Huiling
    Zou, Tianyu
    Wang, Xianlong
    Jiang, Shanshan
    Huang, Zhongqing
    Du, Yongxing
    Jiang, Chunxiu
    Ma, Ling
    Zhu, Jianbin
    He, Wen
    Rui, Qihong
    Zhou, Jianyuan
    Wen, Zhibo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (11) : 4516 - 4524
  • [3] Quantitative analysis of mean apparent propagator-magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing glioblastoma from solitary brain metastasis
    Wang, Peipei
    Gao, Eryuan
    Qi, Jinbo
    Ma, Xiaoyue
    Zhao, Kai
    Bai, Jie
    Zhang, Yong
    Zhang, Huiting
    Yang, Guang
    Cheng, Jingliang
    Zhao, Guohua
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 154
  • [4] 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in newborns
    Gilmore, JH
    Zhai, GH
    Wilber, K
    Smith, JK
    Lin, WL
    Gerig, G
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING, 2004, 132 (01) : 81 - 85
  • [5] Navigating Brain Metastases: Unveiling the Potential of 3-Tesla Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Altawalbeh, Ghaith
    Goldberg, Maria
    Mondragon-Soto, Michel Gustavo
    Negwer, Chiara
    Wagner, Arthur
    Gempt, Jens
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Aftahy, Amir Kaywan
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (16)
  • [6] Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Glioblastoma Multiforme and Brain Metastases: The Role of p, q, L, and Fractional Anisotropy
    Wang, W.
    Steward, C. E.
    Desmond, P. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2009, 30 (01) : 203 - 208
  • [7] Multiple deep learning models based on MRI images in discriminating glioblastoma from solitary brain metastases: a multicentre study
    Chao Kong
    Ding Yan
    Kai Liu
    Yong Yin
    Changsheng Ma
    BMC Medical Imaging, 25 (1)
  • [8] Magnetic resonance imaging of solitary brain metastases: main findings of nonmorphological sequences
    Gaudino, S.
    Di Lella, G. M.
    Russo, R.
    Lo Russo, V. S.
    Piludu, F.
    Quaglio, F. R.
    Gualano, M. R.
    De Waure, C.
    Colosimo, C.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2012, 117 (07): : 1225 - 1241
  • [9] Magnetic resonance imaging of solitary brain metastases: main findings of nonmorphological sequences
    Gaudino, S.
    Di Lella, G. M.
    Russo, R.
    Lo Russo, V. S.
    Piludu, F.
    Quaglio, F. R.
    Gualano, M. R.
    De Waure, C.
    Colosimo, C.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2012, 117 (07): : 1225 - 1241
  • [10] Applying protein-based amide proton transfer MR imaging to distinguish solitary brain metastases from glioblastoma
    Hao Yu
    Huiling Lou
    Tianyu Zou
    Xianlong Wang
    Shanshan Jiang
    Zhongqing Huang
    Yongxing Du
    Chunxiu Jiang
    Ling Ma
    Jianbin Zhu
    Wen He
    Qihong Rui
    Jianyuan Zhou
    Zhibo Wen
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 4516 - 4524