The Effect of Initial Graft Tension After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Randomized Clinical Trial With 36-Month Follow-up

被引:53
作者
Fleming, Braden C. [1 ]
Fadale, Paul D. [1 ]
Hulstyn, Michael J. [1 ]
Shalvoy, Robert M. [1 ]
Oksendahl, Heidi L. [1 ]
Badger, Gary J. [1 ]
Tung, Glenn A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Rhode Isl Hosp, Bioengn Lab, Providence, RI 02903 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament (ACL); autograft; reconstruction; tension; outcomes; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; PATELLAR TENDON; SEMITENDINOSUS; STABILITY; INJURY; BONE; KOOS;
D O I
10.1177/0363546512464200
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The initial graft tension applied at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction alters joint contact and may influence cartilage health. The objective was to compare outcomes between 2 commonly used "laxity-based" initial graft tension protocols. Hypotheses: (1) The high-tension group would have less knee laxity, improved clinical and patient-oriented outcomes, and less cartilage damage than would the low-tension group after 36 months of healing. (2) The outcomes of the high-tension group would be equivalent to those of a matched control group. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Ninety patients with isolated unilateral ACL injuries were randomized to undergo ACL reconstruction using 1 of 2 initial graft tension protocols: (1) autografts tensioned to restore normal anterior-posterior (AP) laxity at the time of surgery (ie, low tension; n = 46) and (2) autografts tensioned to overconstrain AP laxity by 2 mm (ie, high tension; n = 44). Sixty matched healthy patients formed the control group. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at 6, 12, and 36 months after surgery. Results: No significant differences were found between the 2 initial graft tension protocols for any of the outcome measures at 36 months. However, there were differences when comparing the 2 treatment groups to the control group. On average, AP laxity was 2 mm greater in the ACL-reconstructed groups than in the control group (P < .007). International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee evaluation scores, peak isokinetic knee extension torques, and 4 of 5 Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were significantly worse than the control group (P < .001, P < .027, and P < .05, respectively). Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores and reinjury rates were similar between groups at 36 months. Although there were significant changes in radiography and magnetic resonance imaging present in the ACL-reconstructed knees of both treatment groups, the magnitude was relatively small and likely clinically insignificant at 36 months. Conclusion: Both laxity-based initial graft tension protocols produced similar outcomes without fully restoring joint function or patient-oriented outcomes (KOOS) when compared with the control group. There was minimal evidence of cartilage damage 36 months after surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 34
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised [J].
Altman, R. D. ;
Gold, G. E. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2007, 15 :A1-A56
[2]   Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting [J].
Amis A.A. ;
Jakob R.P. .
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 1998, 6 (Suppl 1) :S2-S12
[3]   Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis: Improved Understanding and Opportunities for Early Intervention [J].
Anderson, Donald D. ;
Chubinskaya, Susan ;
Guilak, Farshid ;
Martin, James A. ;
Oegema, Theodore R. ;
Olson, Steven A. ;
Buckwaltert, Joseph A. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2011, 29 (06) :802-809
[4]   Graft Tensioning in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Arneja, Shalinder ;
McConkey, Mark O. ;
Mulpuri, Kishore ;
Chin, Patrick ;
Gilbart, Michael K. ;
Regan, William D. ;
Leith, Jordan M. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2009, 25 (02) :200-207
[5]   Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of programs administered over 2 different time intervals [J].
Beynnon, BD ;
Uh, BS ;
Johnson, RJ ;
Abate, JA ;
Nichols, CE ;
Fleming, BC ;
Poole, AR ;
Roos, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (03) :347-359
[6]   Effects of initial graft tension on the tibiofemoral compressive forces and joint position after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J].
Brady, Mark F. ;
Bradley, Michael P. ;
Fleming, Braden C. ;
Fadale, Paul D. ;
Hulstyn, Michael J. ;
Banerjee, Rahul .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (03) :395-403
[7]  
Buckland-Wright JC, 1999, J RHEUMATOL, V26, P2664
[8]  
BURKS R T, 1988, Arthroscopy, V4, P260, DOI 10.1016/S0749-8063(88)80041-0
[9]   ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT REPLACEMENTS - A MECHANICAL STUDY OF FEMORAL ATTACHMENT LOCATION, FLEXION ANGLE AT TENSIONING, AND INITIAL TENSION [J].
BYLSKIAUSTROW, DI ;
GROOD, ES ;
HEFZY, MS ;
HOLDEN, JP ;
BUTLER, DL .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1990, 8 (04) :522-531
[10]   Patient-relevant outcomes fourteen years after meniscectomy: influence of type of meniscal tear and size of resection [J].
Englund, M ;
Roos, EM ;
Roos, HP ;
Lohmander, LS .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2001, 40 (06) :631-639