The effectiveness of glatiramer acetate in clinical practice: an observational study

被引:0
作者
Fernandez-Fernandez, Oscar [1 ]
Garcia-Trujillo, Lucia [1 ]
Guerrero-Fernandez, Miguel [1 ]
Leon, Antonio [1 ]
Lopez-Madrona, Jose C. [1 ]
Alonso, Ana [1 ]
Bustamante, Rafael [1 ]
Fernandez-Sanchez, Victoria E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Reg Univ Carlos Haya, Inst Neurociencias Clin, Serv Neurol, E-29010 Malaga, Spain
[2] Hosp Reg Univ Carlos Haya, Serv Neurofisiol, E-29010 Malaga, Spain
关键词
Effectiveness; Glatiramer acetate; Multiple sclerosis; Progression; Relapse; Safety; Treatment; REMITTING MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; DOUBLE-BLIND; OPEN-LABEL; MULTICENTER; PREVALENCE; DISABILITY; MS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The effectiveness of glatiramer acetate in clinical practice: an observational study Aim. To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of glatiramer acetate for use in routine clinical practice. Patients and methods. A retrospective, observational study was conducted on patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with glatiramer acetate in clinical practice. The primary outcome was the clinical effectiveness of glatiramer acetate treatment. Results. The study included a total of 104 patients (women, 59.6%; age at onset of glatiramer acetate treatment, 39.9 +/- 10.9 years; prior treatment for multiple sclerosis, 30.8%). The patients had received glatiramer acetate treatment for an average of 3.6 +/- 1.9 years. During the first year of glatiramer acetate treatment, the relapse rate decreased by 60%. At this time, the number of relapses had decreased for 47 patients (45.1%), 67 patients (68.4%) had not suffered a relapse and 78 patients (75.0%) showed no signs of progression. During the second year of glatiramer acetate treatment, the relapse rate decreased by 70%. At this time, the number of relapses had decreased for 43 patients (41.3%), 63 patients (75.9%) had not suffered a relapse and 59 patients (56.7%) showed no signs of progression. There were no reported relapses or progression in 56 patients (53.8%) and 41 patients (39.4%) during the first and second years of treatment, respectively. Discontinuation of glatiramer acetate was necessary in only three patients.-The most common adverse effects included fatigue (28.9%) and spasticity (7.7%). Conclusion. This evaluation of glatiramer acetate use in clinical practice supports the effectiveness and,the safety profile observed in previously published clinical trial studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Glatiramer acetate during early pregnancy: A prospective cohort study
    Herbstritt, Sandra
    Langer-Gould, Annette
    Rockhoff, Milena
    Haghikia, Aiden
    Queisser-Wahrendorf, Annette
    Gold, Ralf
    Hellwig, Kerstin
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (06) : 810 - 816
  • [32] Long-term safety and tolerability of glatiramer acetate 20 mg/ml in the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis
    Ziemssen, Tjalf
    Ashtamker, Natalia
    Rubinchick, Svetlana
    Knappertz, Volker
    Comi, Giancarlo
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 16 (02) : 247 - 255
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of a three-times-weekly dosing regimen of glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: 3-year results of the Glatiramer Acetate Low-Frequency Administration open-label extension study
    Khan, Omar
    Rieckmann, Peter
    Boyko, Alexey
    Selmaj, Krzysztof
    Ashtamker, Natalia
    Davis, Mat D.
    Kolodny, Scott
    Zivadinov, Robert
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (06) : 818 - 829
  • [34] Two decades of subcutaneous glatiramer acetate injection: current role of the standard dose, and new high-dose low-frequency glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treatment
    Caporro, Matteo
    Disanto, Giulio
    Gobbi, Claudio
    Zecca, Chiara
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2014, 8 : 1 - 12
  • [35] Glatiramer Acetate (Copaxone®) in the Treatment of Relapsing/Remitting Cerebrospinal Multiple Sclerosis - Clinical Efficacy and Safety Profile
    Stourac, P.
    Praksova, P.
    Kontrova, I.
    Hladikova, M.
    Okacova, I.
    Benesova, Y.
    CESKA A SLOVENSKA NEUROLOGIE A NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2011, 74 (04) : 447 - 454
  • [36] Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    La Mantia, Loredana
    Di Pietrantonj, Carlo
    Rovaris, Marco
    Rigon, Giulio
    Frau, Serena
    Berardo, Francesco
    Gandini, Anna
    Longobardi, Anna
    Weinstock-Guttman, Bianca
    Vaona, Alberto
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (11):
  • [37] Clinical significance of glatiramer acetate antibodies
    Blanchette, F.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2007, 13 : S28 - S35
  • [38] Interferon Beta and Glatiramer Acetate Therapy
    McGraw, Corey A.
    Lublin, Fred D.
    NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2013, 10 (01) : 2 - 18
  • [39] Predictive cytokine biomarkers of clinical response to glatiramer acetate therapy in multiple sclerosis
    Valenzuela, R. M.
    Kaufman, M.
    Balashov, K. E.
    Ito, K.
    Buyske, S.
    Dhib-Jalbut, S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 300 : 59 - 65
  • [40] Real-world effectiveness of abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) in adults with upper limb spasticity in routine clinical practice: an observational study
    Sarzynska-Dlugosz, Iwona
    Szczepanska-Szerej, Anna
    Druzdz, Artur
    Lukomski, Tomasz
    Ochudlo, Stanislaw
    Fabian, Andrzej
    Sobolewski, Piotr
    Marianska, Katarzyna
    Maciejewska, Joanna
    Mulek, Ewa
    Niedzielska, Alina
    Raymond, Romain
    Brzozka, Magdalena M.
    Jessa-Jablonska, Maria
    NEUROLOGIA I NEUROCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2020, 54 (01) : 90 - 99