A new twist on an old problem: primary care physicians and results from direct-to-consumer genetic testing

被引:5
|
作者
Bartlett, Gillian [1 ]
Avard, Denise [2 ]
Knoppers, Bartha Maria [2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Family Med, Montreal, PQ H3S 1Z1, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Ctr Genom & Policy, Dept Human Genet, Montreal, PQ H3A 0G1, Canada
关键词
children; direct-to-consumer genetic testing; genetic and genomic testing; personalized medicine; primary care; professional roles; PERSONAL GENOMIC TESTS; PUBLIC-HEALTH; AWARENESS; POLICIES; PHARMACOGENOMICS; PERCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCE; ATTITUDES; CHILDREN; RISKS;
D O I
10.2217/pme.13.87
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
With the costs of genomic and genetic testing rapidly decreasing, private companies have begun to offer consumers, including minors, the opportunity to receive a genetic analysis of their DNA. The availability of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) will inevitably result in patients approaching their healthcare providers for interpretation of results, referrals for follow-up tests or provision of personalized medicine. As most healthcare systems require a referral for access to a specialist, the patients are likely to approach primary care providers. The issue of what the professional obligations are for the primary care physician in the case where they did not order the test is not new. The growing DTC-GT movement will add a new twist to an old problem. Best practice recommendations regarding the value of DTC-GT, as well as the identification of current ethical, legal and social implications are urgently needed.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 833
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing the social impact of direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Understanding sociotechnical architectures
    Parthasarathy, Shobita
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 12 (09) : 544 - 547
  • [42] Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals
    McGrath, Scott P.
    Walton, Nephi
    Williams, Marc S.
    Kim, Katherine K.
    Bastola, Kiran
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [43] Assessment of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Policy in Korea Based on Consumer Preference
    Jeong, Gicheol
    PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2017, 20 (03) : 166 - 173
  • [44] Using Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Results to Accelerate Alzheimer Disease Clinical Trial Recruitment
    Ryan, Mary M.
    Cox, Chelsea G.
    Witbracht, Megan
    Hoang, Dan
    Gillen, Daniel L.
    Grill, Joshua D.
    ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS, 2021, 35 (02) : 141 - 147
  • [45] Physicians' Experiences of Patient-Initiated Online Consultations in Primary Care Using Direct-To-Consumer Technology
    Koch, Sabine
    Guhres, Miwa
    DIGITAL PERSONALIZED HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2020, 270 : 643 - 647
  • [46] Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a review of companies’ policies with regard to genetic testing in minors
    Pascal Borry
    Heidi C. Howard
    Karine Sénécal
    Denise Avard
    Familial Cancer, 2010, 9 : 51 - 59
  • [47] Perceived fairness of direct-to-consumer genetic testing business models
    Philipp A. Toussaint
    Scott Thiebes
    Manuel Schmidt-Kraepelin
    Ali Sunyaev
    Electronic Markets, 2022, 32 : 1621 - 1638
  • [48] Framing genetic risk: trust and credibility markers in online direct-to-consumer advertising for genetic testing
    Einsiedel, Edna F.
    Geransar, Rose
    NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2009, 28 (04) : 339 - 362
  • [49] Perceptions of genetic counseling services in direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing
    Darst, B. F.
    Madlensky, L.
    Schork, N. J.
    Topol, E. J.
    Bloss, C. S.
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2013, 84 (04) : 335 - 339
  • [50] Debating the clinical utility of direct-to-consumer genetic testing for addiction susceptibility
    Borry, Pascal
    Henneman, Lidewij
    ADDICTION, 2012, 107 (12) : 2076 - 2077