Screening for Prostate Cancer: Results of the Rotterdam Section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer

被引:91
作者
Roobol, Monique J. [1 ]
Kranse, Ries [2 ]
Bangma, Chris H. [1 ]
van Leenders, Arno G. J. L. H. [3 ]
Blijenberg, Bert G. [4 ]
van Schaik, Ron H. N. [4 ]
Kirkels, Wim J. [1 ]
Otto, Suzie J. [5 ]
van der Kwast, Theo H. [3 ]
de Koning, Harry J. [5 ]
Schroder, Fritz H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Ctr Comprehens Canc, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Dept Pathol, Med Ctr, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Chem, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Prostate cancer; Screening; PSA; Biopsy; Mortality; ERSPC ROTTERDAM; FOLLOW-UP; MORTALITY; ANTIGEN; TRIAL; BIOPSY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.030
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Evidence from randomized trials on the effects of screening for prostate cancer (PCa) on disease-specific mortality accumulates slowly with increasing follow-up. Objective: To assess data on PCa-specific mortality in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial. Design, setting, and participants: A randomized controlled trial with randomization after signed, written informed consent (efficacy trial). In the period 1993-1999, a total of 42 376 men aged 54-74 yr were randomized to a screening arm (S-arm) (n = 21 210 with screening every 4 yr, applying a total prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level cut-off >= 3.0 ng/ml as biopsy indication) or a control arm (C-arm) (n = 21 166; no intervention). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Number of PCas detected per arm depicted by predefined time periods and prognostic groups. PCa-specific mortality analyses using Poisson regression in age group 55-74 yr at randomization and separately in the predefined age group of 55-69 yr. Results and limitations: After a median follow-up of 12.8 yr, 19 765 men (94.2%) were screened at least once and 2674 PCas were detected (of which 561 [21.0%] were interval PCas). In the C-arm, 1430 PCas were detected, resulting in an excess incidence of 59 PCas per 1000 men randomized (61 PCas per 1000 in age group 55-69 yr). Thirty-two percent of all men randomized have died. PCa-specific mortality relative-risk (RR) reductions of 20.0% overall (age: 55-74 yr; p = 0.042) and 31.6% (age: 55-69 yr; p = 0.004) were found. A 14.1% increase was found in men aged 70-74 yr (not statistically significant). Absolute PCa mortality was 1.8 per 1000 men randomized (2.6 per 1000 men randomized in age group 55-69 yr). The number needed to invite and number needed to manage were 565 and 33, respectively, for age group 55-74 yr, and 392 and 24, respectively, for age group 65-69 yr. Given the slow natural history of the disease, follow-up might be too short. Conclusions: Systematic PSA-based screening reduced PCa-specific mortality by 32% in the age range of 55-69 yr. The roughly twofold higher incidence in the S-arm underlines the importance of tools to better identify those men who would benefit from screening. (C) 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 539
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   NONPARAMETRIC INFERENCE FOR A FAMILY OF COUNTING PROCESSES [J].
AALEN, O .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1978, 6 (04) :701-726
[2]   Prostate Cancer Screening in the Randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: Mortality Results after 13 Years of Follow-up [J].
Andriole, Gerald L. ;
Crawford, E. David ;
Grubb, Robert L., III ;
Buys, Saundra S. ;
Chia, David ;
Church, Timothy R. ;
Fouad, Mona N. ;
Isaacs, Claudine ;
Kvale, Paul A. ;
Reding, Douglas J. ;
Weissfeld, Joel L. ;
Yokochi, Lance A. ;
O'Brien, Barbara ;
Ragard, Lawrence R. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Rathmell, Joshua M. ;
Riley, Thomas L. ;
Hsing, Ann W. ;
Izmirlian, Grant ;
Pinsky, Paul F. ;
Kramer, Barnett S. ;
Miller, Anthony B. ;
Gohagan, John K. ;
Prorok, Philip C. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2012, 104 (02) :125-132
[3]  
[Anonymous], SEER stat fact sheets
[4]  
[Anonymous], LIF RISK CANC
[5]   Quality assessment for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in relation to ERSPC: report of the PSA Committee [J].
Blijenberg, BG ;
Lilja, H ;
Neels, H ;
Stenman, UH .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 :66-70
[6]   Positive predictive value of prostate biopsy indicated by prostate-specific-antigen-based prostate cancer screening: trends over time in a European randomized trial [J].
Bokhorst, Leonard P. ;
Zhu, Xiaoye ;
Bul, Meelan ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Schroder, Fritz H. ;
Roobol, Monique J. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (11) :1654-1660
[7]   CLINICAL-EVIDENCE FOR AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE MULTISTEP DEVELOPMENT OF PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
CARTER, HB ;
PIANTADOSI, S ;
ISAACS, JT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 143 (04) :742-746
[8]   Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology [J].
Chun, FKH ;
Steuber, T ;
Erbersdobler, A ;
Currlin, E ;
Walz, J ;
Schlomm, T ;
Haese, A ;
Heinzer, H ;
McCormack, M ;
Huland, H ;
Graefen, M ;
Karakiewicz, PI .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (05) :820-826
[9]   Determining the cause of death in randomized screening trial(s) for prostate cancer [J].
De Koning, HJ ;
Blom, J ;
Merkelbach, JW ;
Raaijmakers, R ;
Verhaegen, H ;
Van Vliet, P ;
Nelen, V ;
Coebergh, JWW ;
Hermans, A ;
Ciatto, S ;
Mäkinen, T .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 :71-78
[10]   Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate [J].
Eskew, LA ;
Bare, RL ;
McCullough, DL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (01) :199-202