Inclusion of detergent in a cleaning regime and effect on microbial load in livestock housing

被引:26
作者
Hancox, L. R. [1 ]
Le Bon, M. [1 ]
Dodd, C. E. R. [1 ]
Mellits, K. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Biosci, Div Food Sci, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leics, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
IN-VITRO EFFICACY; SALMONELLA; DISINFECTANTS; BIOFILM; CONTAMINATION; RESISTANCE; VIRUSES; FARMS;
D O I
10.1136/vr.101392
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Determining effective cleaning and disinfection regimes of livestock housing is vital to improving the health of resident animals and reducing zoonotic disease. A cleaning regime consisting of scraping, soaking with or without detergent (treatment and control), pressure washing, disinfection and natural drying was applied to multiple pig pens. After each cleaning stage, samples were taken from different materials and enumerated for total aerobic count (TAC) and Enterobacteriaceae (ENT). Soaking with detergent (Blast-Off, Biolink) caused significantly greater reductions of TAC and ENT on metal, and TAC on concrete, compared with control. Disinfection effect (Virkon S, DuPont) was not significantly associated with prior detergent treatment. Disinfection significantly reduced TAC and ENT on concrete and stock board but not on metal. Twenty-four hours after disinfection TAC and ENT on metal and stock board were significantly reduced, but no significant reductions occurred in the subsequent 96 hours. Counts on concrete did not significantly reduce during the entire drying period (120 hours). Detergent and disinfectant have varying bactericidal effects according to the surface and bacterial target; however, both can significantly reduce microbial numbers so should be used during cleaning, with a minimum drying period of 24 hours, to lower bacterial counts effectively.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / +
页数:4
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Amass SF, 2001, J SWINE HEALTH PROD, V9, P121
[2]   Comparative evaluation of methods for counting surviving biofilm cells adhering to a polyvinyl chloride surface exposed to chlorine or drying [J].
Assere, A. ;
Oulahal, N. ;
Carpentier, B. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 104 (06) :1692-1702
[3]   Resistance of bacterial biofilms to disinfectants: a review [J].
Bridier, A. ;
Briandet, R. ;
Thomas, V. ;
Dubois-Brissonnet, F. .
BIOFOULING, 2011, 27 (09) :1017-1032
[4]   Sources of salmonella on broiler carcasses during transportation and processing: modes of contamination and methods of control [J].
Corry, JEL ;
Allen, VM ;
Hudson, WR ;
Breslin, MF ;
Davies, RH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 92 (03) :424-432
[5]   Observations on Salmonella contamination of commercial laying farms before and after cleaning and disinfection [J].
Davies, R ;
Breslin, M .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2003, 152 (10) :283-287
[6]   Inactivation of avian influenza viruses by chemical agents and physical conditions: A review [J].
De Benedictis, P. ;
Beato, M. S. ;
Capua, I. .
ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 54 (02) :51-68
[7]   SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SUSPENDED AND SURFACE-ATTACHED SALMONELLA-ENTERITIDIS TO BIOCIDES AND ELEVATED-TEMPERATURES [J].
DHIR, VK ;
DODD, CER .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 61 (05) :1731-1738
[8]   Biofilms: Microbial life on surfaces [J].
Donlan, RM .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 8 (09) :881-890
[9]   The effect of Virkon®S fogging on survival of Salmonella enterica and Staphylococcus aureus on surfaces in a veterinary teaching hospital [J].
Dunowska, M ;
Morley, PS ;
Hyatt, DR .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 105 (3-4) :281-289
[10]  
Eggum B. O., 1974, Agriculture and Environment, V1, P59, DOI 10.1016/0304-1131(74)90067-8