How to Achieve a Healthier and More Sustainable Europe by 2040 According to the Public? Results of a Five-Country Questionnaire Survey

被引:10
作者
Zverinova, Iva [1 ]
Maca, Vojtech [1 ]
Scasny, Milan [1 ]
Strube, Rosa [2 ]
Marques, Sibila [3 ]
Dubova, Diana [1 ]
Kryl, Martin [1 ]
Craveiro, Daniela [3 ]
Taylor, Timothy [4 ]
Chiabai, Aline [5 ]
Garcia de Jalon, Silvestre [5 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Environm Ctr, Prague 16200, Czech Republic
[2] Collaborating Ctr Sustainable Consumpt & Prod, D-42107 Wuppertal, Germany
[3] Inst Univ Lisboa ISCTE IUL, CIS IUL, P-1649026 Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Univ Exeter, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Med Sch, Truro TR1 3HD, England
[5] Basque Ctr Climate Change, Biscaya 48004, Pais Vasco, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
future scenarios; public health; sustainability; equity; green spaces; active mobility; housing; food consumption; values; public acceptability; policy support; LOW-CARBON FUTURES; ENERGY; IMPACT; VALUES; CONNECTEDNESS; INEQUALITIES; PREFERENCES; FOOD;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17176071
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to understand public preferences for several future scenarios of achieving a healthier, more equitable and sustainable Europe, which differ in the way the society is organized (individualistically vs. collectively) and in the driving sector (public vs. private). To achieve this aim, we conducted a questionnaire survey using representative samples for five European countries in 2018. About three thousand respondents chose among the four scenarios presented within four different contexts (green spaces, active mobility, energy-efficient housing, food consumption) or none of them. A majority of people in the five European countries were ready to accept one of the scenarios. We found significant differences in preferences according to socioeconomic backgrounds and values of respondents. People above 35 years old, those who were less educated, and those in the lowest household income tertile were less supportive of all scenarios. The heterogeneity in preferences associated with differences in socioeconomic backgrounds was larger for the scenario in which society is organized individualistically and driven by the private sector. Smaller distinctions were found in case of the scenario in which society is organized collectively and is driven by the public sector. Departing from social psychological theories, we examine the role of altruistic, biospheric, egoistic, hedonic, and security values. People with stronger biospheric values were more likely to accept scenarios, particularly those which are driven by the public sector and where there is more collective organisation. Those with a more egoistic value orientation were more likely to have higher preferences for scenarios where the private sector had a dominant role. The policy implications, in terms of the selection and framing of policy measures to enhance public support, are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:24
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Household perceptions of climate change and preferences for mitigation action: the case of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme in Australia [J].
Akter, Sonia ;
Bennett, Jeff .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2011, 109 (3-4) :417-436
[2]   Preferences for Energy Efficiency vs. Renewables: What Is the Willingness to Pay to Reduce CO2 Emissions? [J].
Alberini, Anna ;
Bigano, Andrea ;
Scasny, Milan ;
Zverinova, Iva .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 144 :171-185
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/su9050679
[4]  
[Anonymous], Open Spaces and Green Areas|Urban Indicators Database
[5]  
[Anonymous], UN SUST DEV GOALS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CONSERVATION LETT, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2009.00048.X
[7]   The Dual Route to Value Change: Individual Processes and Cultural Moderators [J].
Bardi, Anat ;
Goodwin, Robin .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 42 (02) :271-287
[8]   Climate for Change, or How to Create a Green Modernity? [J].
Beck, Ulrich .
THEORY CULTURE & SOCIETY, 2010, 27 (2-3) :254-266
[9]   Carbon tax simulations using a household demand model [J].
Brännlund, R ;
Nordström, J .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 48 (01) :211-233
[10]   Obesity-related health impacts of fuel excise taxation-an evidence review and cost-effectiveness study [J].
Brown, V. ;
Moodie, M. ;
Cobiac, L. ;
Herrera, A. M. Mantilla ;
Carter, R. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 17