Correlation between contrast sensitivity and the lens opacities classification system III in age-related nuclear and cortical cataracts

被引:12
作者
Cheng Yong [1 ,3 ]
Shi Xuan [2 ]
Cao Xiao-guang [1 ,3 ]
Li Xiao-xin [1 ,3 ]
Bao Yong-zhen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, People Eye Inst, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Educ, Key Lab Vis Loss & Restorat, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
关键词
contrast sensitivity; visual function; age-related cataract; lens opacities classification system III; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VISUAL FUNCTION; ACUITY; MORPHOLOGY; VISION; LASER; GLARE; ASSOCIATION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20123274
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Contrast sensitivity (CS) testing can detect differences in functional vision and is highly correlated with visual performance. This study was designed to investigate the association between CS and the grading score using the lens opacities classification system (LOCS) III as well as the association between CS and visual acuity (VA) in nuclear or cortical age-related cataract (ARC) patients. Methods A total of 270 eyes with ARC and 30 control eyes were divided into nuclear opacity (NO), nuclear color (NC), cortical cataract (C) based on LOCS III. The CS values measured at all spatial frequencies under photopic and glare conditions that resulted in contrast sensitivity function (CSF) were evaluated, and LogMAR VA was tested with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. The correlation between CSF and LOCS III grading scores, and between CSF and LogMAR VA were analyzed. Results Compared to the controls, CSF of the nuclear or cortical ARC significantly declined. There are significant correlation between CSF and LogMAR VA, and between CSF and LOCS III grading scores. Compared to the VA, a stronger correlation existed between CSF and LOCS III grading score than that of LogMAR VA and LOCS Ill grading score. CS at some spatial frequencies is significantly influenced with LOCS III grading score. Conclusions CSF significantly declined with the increasing ARC grading scores. Comparing to VA, CSF reflected the severity of cataract more comprehensively. CS at low spatial frequency is significantly influenced by ARC. Therefore, CS is more precise than VA in assessing the visual function of ARC patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1430 / 1435
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   The association of postoperative subjective visual function with acuity, glare, and contrast sensitivity in patients with early cataract [J].
Adamsons, IA ;
Vitale, S ;
Stark, WJ ;
Rubin, GS .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 114 (05) :529-536
[2]   Influence of Cataract Morphology on Straylight and Contrast Sensitivity and Its Relevance to Fitness to Drive [J].
Bal, Tina ;
Coeckelbergh, Tanja ;
Van Looveren, Jan ;
Rozema, Jos J. ;
Tassignon, Marie-Jose .
OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2011, 225 (02) :105-111
[3]   Effects of cataract type and location on visual function: The Blue Mountains Eye Study [J].
Chua, BE ;
Mitchell, P ;
Cumming, RG .
EYE, 2004, 18 (08) :765-772
[4]  
Chylack L T Jr, 1995, Ophthalmic Epidemiol, V2, P59, DOI 10.3109/09286589509057085
[5]   THE LENS OPACITIES CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM-III [J].
CHYLACK, LT ;
WOLFE, JK ;
SINGER, DM ;
LESKE, MC ;
BULLIMORE, MA ;
BAILEY, IL ;
FRIEND, J ;
MCCARTHY, D ;
WU, SY .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 111 (06) :831-836
[6]   CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH NUCLEAR CATARACTS [J].
DREWSBANKIEWICZ, MA ;
CARUSO, RC ;
DATILES, MB ;
KAISERKUPFER, MI .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 110 (07) :953-959
[7]   CONTRAST SENSITIVITY AND GLARE SENSITIVITY CHANGES WITH 3 TYPES OF CATARACT MORPHOLOGY - ARE THESE TECHNIQUES NECESSARY IN A CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF CATARACT [J].
ELLIOTT, DB ;
GILCHRIST, J ;
WHITAKER, D .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1989, 9 (01) :25-30
[8]   Risk factors for nuclear, cortical and posterior subcapsular cataracts in the Chinese population of Singapore: the Tanjong Pagar Survey [J].
Foster, PJ ;
Wong, TY ;
Machin, D ;
Johnson, GJ ;
Seah, SKL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 87 (09) :1112-1120
[9]  
Fu Jing, 2006, Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi, V42, P236
[10]  
Ginsburg Arthur P., 2003, International Ophthalmology Clinics, V43, P5