Decellularized Versus Fresh-Frozen Allografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An In Vitro Study in a Rabbit Model

被引:32
作者
Dong, Shikui [1 ]
Huangfu, Xiaoqiao [1 ]
Xie, Guoming [1 ]
Zhang, Yang [1 ]
Shen, Peng [1 ]
Li, Xiaoxi [1 ]
Qi, Jin [1 ]
Zhao, Jinzhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Peoples Hosp 6, Shanghai 200233, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament; reconstruction; allograft; decellularization; semitendinosus tendon; collagen birefringence; PATELLAR TENDON AUTOGRAFT; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; FOLLOW-UP; TISSUE; METAANALYSIS; TRANSMISSION; GRAFTS; AUGMENTATION; PREDICTORS; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1177/0363546515585314
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The common fresh-frozen allografts that are used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions behave slower during the remodeling process and produce weaker tendon-bone integrations than do autografts. Decellularization of allogenic tendons results in a clean and porous collagen scaffold with low antigenicity and high compatibility, which may be more suitable for ACL reconstructions. Hypothesis: Allograft decellularization will result in a tissue structure with suitable mechanical characteristics for ACL reconstruction, thereby promoting graft remodeling and enhancing tendon-bone healing. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Decellularized allograft tissues were prepared with a pH-modified decellularization process and evaluated for their biocompatibility and biomechanical character in vitro. Eighty New Zealand White rabbits were divided into 2 groups, with 40 in each group, to receive ACL reconstruction with either fresh-frozen (common) allografts or decellularized allografts on both knees. At 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively, the rabbits were euthanized for biomechanical testing, micro-computed tomography analysis, and histologic analysis. Results: The pH-modified decellularized allograft tissues kept excellent biocompatibility and biomechanical character during the in vitro study. Biomechanical testing indicated that the decellularized allograft had significantly higher ultimate load (P = .02) and stiffness (P = .01) levels than the common allograft at 12 weeks, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups at any other time point. The micro-CT evaluation determined significantly higher bone mineral density (P < .01) in the decellularized allograft group than that in the common allograft group at 12 weeks, but no difference between the 2 groups was observed at any other time point. Regarding bone volume/total volume, there was no difference between the 2 groups at any time point. Fibroblast ingrowths, vascular formation, and connective tissue formation in the tendon-bone interface were better in the decellularized group within 8 weeks. New bone formation was more common in the decellularized allograft group. The collagen birefringence was restored more quickly in the decellularized allograft group than in the common allograft group at all time points. Conclusion: The use of pH-modified decellularized allografts compared with the common allografts resulted in better cellularity, vascularity, collagen matrix remolding, new bone formation around the graft, enhanced tendon-bone healing, and higher ultimate failure load and stiffness of the graft after ACL reconstruction in the rabbit model. Clinical Relevance: The pH-modified decellularized allograft may be a better graft option than the common fresh-frozen allograft for knee ligament reconstructions.
引用
收藏
页码:1924 / 1934
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Allograft versus autograft
    Chang, SKY
    Egami, DK
    Shaieb, MD
    Kan, DM
    Richardson, AB
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2003, 19 (05) : 453 - 462
  • [42] LARS Artificial Ligament Versus ABC Purely Polyester Ligament for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Iliadis, Dimitrios Ph.
    Bourlos, Dimitrios N.
    Mastrokalos, Dimitrios S.
    Chronopoulos, Efstathios
    Babis, George C.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (06):
  • [43] Autograft versus allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
    Kan, Shun-Li
    Yuan, Zhi-Fang
    Ning, Guang-Zhi
    Yang, Bo
    Li, Hai-Liang
    Sun, Jing-Cheng
    Feng, Shi-Qing
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (38)
  • [44] Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
    Pang, Long
    Li, Pengcheng
    Li, Tao
    Li, Yinghao
    Zhu, Jing
    Tang, Xin
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [45] Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Tibialis Anterior Tendon Allografts
    Vidal, Armando F.
    Brucker, Peter U.
    Fu, Freddie H.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 15 (02) : 140 - 145
  • [46] Sex Influences the Biomechanical Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Preclinical Large Animal Model
    Kiapour, Ata M.
    Fleming, Braden C.
    Proffen, Benedikt L.
    Murray, Martha M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (07) : 1623 - 1631
  • [47] Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor on the cellular repopulation of decellularized anterior cruciate ligament allografts
    MacLean, Scott B. A.
    Gratzer, Paul F.
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 5 (03) : 201 - 209
  • [48] Cost comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Autograft versus allograft
    Cole, DW
    Ginn, TA
    Chen, GJ
    Smith, BP
    Curl, WW
    Martin, DF
    Poehling, GG
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2005, 21 (07) : 786 - 790
  • [49] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Chitin-coated Fabrics in a Rabbit Model
    Kawai, Tomoyuki
    Yamada, Takeki
    Yasukawa, Akio
    Koyama, Yoshihisa
    Muneta, Takeshi
    Takakuda, Kazuo
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2010, 34 (01) : 55 - 64
  • [50] Patellar versus hamstring tendons in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis
    Yunes, M
    Richmond, JC
    Engels, EA
    Pinczewski, LA
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2001, 17 (03) : 248 - 257