Paradigm changes in spine surgery-evolution of minimally invasive techniques

被引:83
作者
Smith, Zachary A. [1 ]
Fessler, Richard G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, NW Mem Hosp, Dept Neurol Surg, Chicago, IL 60601 USA
关键词
LATERAL EXTRACAVITARY APPROACH; LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; MINI-OPEN; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; BILATERAL DECOMPRESSION; UNILATERAL APPROACH; STENOSIS; LAMINECTOMY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1038/nrneurol.2012.110
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) techniques were developed to address morbidities associated with open spinal surgery approaches. MISS was initially applied for indications such as the microendoscopic decompression of stenosis (MEDS)-an operation that has become widely implemented in modern spine surgery practice. Minimally invasive surgery for MEDS is an excellent example of how an MISS technique has improved outcomes compared with the use of traditional open surgical procedures. In parallel with reports of surgeon experience, accumulating clinical evidence suggests that MISS is favoured over open surgery, and one could argue that the role of MISS techniques will continue to expand. As the field of minimally invasive surgery has developed, MISS has been implemented for the treatment of increasingly difficult and complex pathologies, including trauma, spinal malignancies and spinal deformity in adults. In this Review, we present the accumulating evidence in support of minimally invasive techniques for established MISS indications, such as lumbar stenosis, and discuss the need for additional level I and level II data to demonstrate the benefit of MISS over traditional open surgery. The expanding utility of MISS techniques to address an increasingly broad range of spinal pathologies is also highlighted.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 450
页数:8
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Microendoscopic posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy for unilateral radiculopathy: results of a new technique in 100 cases [J].
Adamson, TE .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 95 (01) :51-57
[2]  
[Anonymous], US MUSCULOSKELET REV
[3]   Tubular Diskectomy vs Conventional Microdiskectomy for Sciatica A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Arts, Mark P. ;
Brand, Ronald ;
van den Akker, M. Elske ;
Koes, Bart W. ;
Bartels, Ronald H. M. A. ;
Peul, Wilco C. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (02) :149-158
[4]   Minimally invasive operative management for lumbar spinal stenosis: Overview of early and long-term outcomes [J].
Asgarzadie, Farbod ;
Khoo, Larry T. .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 38 (03) :387-+
[5]   The Maine Lumbar Spine Study .3. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Deyo, RA ;
Keller, RB ;
Chapin, AM ;
Patrick, DL ;
Long, JM ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (15) :1787-1794
[6]   Medical complications of surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity and how to avoid them [J].
Baron, Eli M. ;
Albert, Todd J. .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (19) :S106-S118
[7]   THE LATERAL EXTRACAVITARY APPROACH TO THE SPINE USING THE 3-QUARTER PRONE POSITION [J].
BENZEL, EC .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1989, 71 (06) :837-841
[8]   Spine Extreme lateral interbody fusion - XLIF [J].
Billinghurst, Jason ;
Akbarnia, Behrooz A. .
CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2009, 20 (03) :238-251
[9]   Evaluation of Change in Muscle Activity as a Result of Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery Using a Dynamic Modeling System [J].
Bresnahan, Lacey ;
Fessler, Richard G. ;
Natarajan, Raghu N. .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (16) :E761-E767
[10]   A Biomechanical Evaluation of Graded Posterior Element Removal for Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis Comparison of a Minimally Invasive Approach With Two Standard Laminectomy Techniques [J].
Bresnahan, Lacey ;
Ogden, Alfred T. ;
Natarajan, Raghu N. ;
Fessler, Richard G. .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (01) :17-23