Identifying profiles of listed home-based child care providers based on their beliefs and self-reported practices

被引:11
作者
Hooper, Alison [1 ]
Hallam, Rena [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Curriculum & Instruct, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Univ Delaware, Human Dev & Family Studies, Newark, DE USA
关键词
Home-based child care; Family child care; Quality improvement; Early childhood education; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; ACADEMIC SKILLS; MISSING DATA; QUALITY; FAMILY; EDUCATION; EXPERIENCES; PREDICTORS; LITERACY; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.11.008
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study seeks to broaden the knowledge base of the diverse home-based child care provider workforce in the United States. Home-based child care is a crucial part of the child care landscape with approximately seven million children from birth to five receiving care in home-based settings. Through secondary analysis of the National Survey of Early Care and Education data on listed home-based providers (n= 3493), latent profile analysis was used to explore how providers grouped into profiles based on key characteristics related to their caregiving beliefs and their self-reported instructional practices, professional engagement, and family supportive practices. Findings reveal providers aligned into three profiles: Educationally Focused (72.4%), Educationally Aware (15.7%), and Caregiver (11.8%). Frequency of implementing planned educational activities emerged as a particularly salient distinction among the three groups. Results suggest that although listed home-based providers appear somewhat homogeneous in their demographic characteristics, they vary in their instructional practices with children and their own professional engagement. Therefore, they may benefit from a tailored approach to quality improvement that attends to these differences. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 205
页数:12
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [21] A Primer on Maximum Likelihood Algorithms Available for Use With Missing Data
    Enders, Craig K.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2001, 8 (01) : 128 - 141
  • [22] A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices
    Fang, ZH
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 38 (01) : 47 - 65
  • [23] Predictors of quality and child outcomes in family child care settings
    Forry, Nicole
    Iruka, Iheoma
    Tout, Kathryn
    Torquati, Julia
    Susman-Stillman, Amy
    Bryant, Donna
    Daneri, M. Paula
    [J]. EARLY CHILDHOOD RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2013, 28 (04) : 893 - 904
  • [24] Diverse Pathways in Early Childhood Professional Development: An Exploration of Early Educators in Public Preschools, Private Preschools, and Family Child Care Homes
    Fuligni, Allison Sidle
    Howes, Carollee
    Lara-Cinisomo, Sandraluz
    Karoly, Lynn
    [J]. EARLY EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 20 (03) : 507 - 526
  • [25] Geiser C., 2014, Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, V56, P3, DOI DOI 10.1037/T00898-000
  • [26] Geiser C., 2013, Data Analysis with Mplus
  • [27] Gordon RA, 2001, DEMOGRAPHY, V38, P299, DOI 10.2307/3088307
  • [28] A Two-State Study of Family Child Care Engagement in Quality Rating and Improvement Systems: A Mixed-Methods Analysis
    Hallam, Rena
    Hooper, Alison
    Bargreen, Kaitlin
    Buell, Martha
    Han, Myae
    [J]. EARLY EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 28 (06) : 669 - 683
  • [29] Quality in Family Child Care Settings: The Relationship Between Provider Educational Experiences and Global Quality Scores in a Statewide Quality Rating and Improvement System
    Hallam, Rena A.
    Bargreen, Kaitlin N.
    Ridgley, Robyn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN CHILDHOOD EDUCATION, 2013, 27 (04) : 393 - 406
  • [30] Hamm K., 2005, OUR OWN BACKYARDS LO