The present state of treatments for articular cartilage defects in the knee

被引:59
作者
Perera, J. R. [1 ]
Gikas, P. D. [1 ]
Bentley, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp NHS Trust, London, England
关键词
Autologous chondrocyte implantation; Osteochondral lesions; Chondral lesions; Mosaicplasty; Matrix assisted chondrocyte implantation; Scaffolds; Tissue engineering; AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE IMPLANTATION; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; OSTEOCHONDRAL DEFECTS; REPAIR; TRANSPLANTATION; TISSUE; INJURIES; TRIAL; MICROFRACTURE; MOSAICPLASTY;
D O I
10.1308/003588412X13171221592573
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION Chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee are notoriously difficult to treat due to the poor healing capacity of articular cartilage and the hostile environment of moving joints, ultimately causing disabling pain and early osteoarthritis. There are many different reconstructive techniques used currently but few are proven to be of value. However, some have been shown to produce a better repair with hyaline-like cartilage rather than fibrocartilage. METHODS A systematic search of all available online databases including PubMed, MEDLINE (R) and Embase (TM) was undertaken using several keywords. All the multiple treatment options and methods available were considered. These were summarised, and the evidence for and against them was scrutinised. RESULTS A total of 460 articles were identified after cross-referencing the database searches using the keywords. These revealed that autologous and matrix assisted chondrocyte implantation demonstrated both 'good to excellent' histological results and significant improvement in clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Autologous and matrix assisted chondrocyte implantation have been shown to treat symptomatic lesions successfully with significant histological and clinical improvement. There is, however, still a need for further randomised clinical trials, perfecting the type of scaffold and the use of adjuncts such as growth factors. A list of recommendations for treatment and the potential future trends of managing these lesions are given.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 387
页数:7
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] ASHTON JE, 1982, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V64, P384
  • [2] Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee
    Bartlett, W
    Skinner, JA
    Gooding, CR
    Carrington, RWJ
    Flanagan, AM
    Briggs, TWR
    Bentley, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2005, 87B (05): : 640 - 645
  • [3] A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee
    Bentley, G
    Biant, LC
    Carrington, RWJ
    Akmal, M
    Goldberg, A
    Williams, AM
    Skinner, JA
    Pringle, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2003, 85B (02): : 223 - 230
  • [4] HOMOTRANSPLANTATION OF ISOLATED EPIPHYSEAL AND ARTICULAR CARTILAGE CHONDROCYTES INTO JOINT SURFACES OF RABBITS
    BENTLEY, G
    GREER, RB
    [J]. NATURE, 1971, 230 (5293) : 385 - &
  • [5] Bentley G, 2007, ANN M BRIT ORTH ASS
  • [6] Birman Michael V, 2009, J Knee Surg, V22, P99
  • [7] Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair
    Brittberg, M
    Winalski, CS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A : 58 - 69
  • [8] TREATMENT OF DEEP CARTILAGE DEFECTS IN THE KNEE WITH AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE TRANSPLANTATION
    BRITTBERG, M
    LINDAHL, A
    NILSSON, A
    OHLSSON, C
    ISAKSSON, O
    PETERSON, L
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (14) : 889 - 895
  • [9] Brown D. E., 2004, ORTHOPAEDIC SECRETS
  • [10] Browne JE, 2005, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P237, DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000164298.63534.64