Comparison of the Clinical Value of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Prognostic Nutritional Index as Determinants of Survival Outcome in Patients with Gastric Cancer

被引:10
|
作者
An, Soomin [1 ]
Eo, Wankyu [2 ]
Lee, Sookyung [3 ]
机构
[1] Dongyang Univ, Dept Nursing, Gyeongbuk, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ, Coll Korean Med, Dept Clin Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF CANCER | 2022年 / 13卷 / 12期
关键词
Gastrectomy; Nutritional indices; Prognosis; Stomach neoplasm; SERUM-ALBUMIN; GASTRECTOMY; MORBIDITY; CORRELATE;
D O I
10.7150/jca.77397
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is an important determinant of overall survival (OS) in patients with stage I-III gastric cancer (GC) across all ages; however, its value as a determinant of disease-free survival (DFS) is unclear. Moreover, the prognostic values between the GNRI and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the value of the GNRI and PNI as determinants of OS and DFS in patients with stage I-III GC who underwent curative-intent gastrectomy. Cox regression analysis was used for evaluating the determinants of survival outcomes. The discriminative capacity of the prognostic model was determined using the concordance index (C-index), and then C-indices of related models were compared. Results: Data from 450 patients were analyzed. The median patient age was 60 years (range: 26-92 years). In total, 276 (61.3%) patients had stage I cancer, 83 (18.4%) had stage II cancer, and 91 ( 20.2%) had stage III cancer. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, type of gastrectomy (TOG), T stage, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and GNRI were determinants of OS. These five covariates constituted the GNRI model for the OS. In addition, multivariate analysis revealed that age, TOG, TNM stage, and GNRI were determinants of DFS. These four covariates constituted the GNRI model for DFS. When constructing the PNI model for OS (comprising age, TOG, T stage, TNM stage, and PNI), and PNI model for DFS (including age, TOG, TNM stage, and PNI), the C-indices of the GNRI and PNI models were nearly equal for OS (0.818 and 0.818, respectively; p=0.909) and DFS (0.805 and 0.808, respectively; p=0.653). Using the GNRI models, nomograms for predicting OS and DFS were established. When validating the nomograms using calibration curves, the predicted survival closely matched the actual survival rate. Conclusion: The GNRI and PNI were important determinants of both OS and DFS in patients with GC across all ages. In addition, the effects of the GNRI model on OS and DFS were similar to those of the PNI model.
引用
收藏
页码:3348 / 3357
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in gastric cancer
    Nogueiro, Jorge
    Santos-Sousa, Hugo
    Pereira, Andre
    Devezas, Vitor
    Fernandes, Cristina
    Sousa, Fabiana
    Fonseca, Telma
    Barbosa, Elisabete
    Barbosa, Jose Adelino
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2022, 407 (07) : 2703 - 2714
  • [2] Prognostic value of geriatric nutritional risk index in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
    Yu, Wenxiu
    Wang, Hongfen
    Li, Mao
    Yang, Fei
    Bai, Jiongming
    Song, Han
    Huang, Xusheng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 122 : 19 - 24
  • [3] Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Survival of Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhao, Haiming
    Xu, Li
    Tang, Peng
    Guo, Rui
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [4] Prognostic and clinicopathological value of the geriatric nutritional risk index in gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of 5,834 patients
    He, Liang
    Li, Ying
    Qu, Linlin
    Zhang, Fan
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 9
  • [5] Lower Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Prognostic Nutritional Index Predict Postoperative Prognosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Tsukagoshi, Mariko
    Araki, Kenichiro
    Igarashi, Takamichi
    Ishii, Norihiro
    Kawai, Shunsuke
    Hagiwara, Kei
    Hoshino, Kouki
    Seki, Takaomi
    Okuyama, Takayuki
    Fukushima, Ryosuke
    Harimoto, Norifumi
    Shirabe, Ken
    NUTRIENTS, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [6] Value of Prognostic Nutritional Index as a Predictor of Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer
    Kosuga, Toshiyuki
    Konishi, Tomoki
    Kubota, Takeshi
    Shoda, Katsutoshi
    Konishi, Hirotaka
    Shiozaki, Atsushi
    Okamoto, Kazuma
    Fujiwara, Hitoshi
    Kudou, Michihiro
    Arita, Tomohiro
    Morimura, Ryo
    Murayama, Yasutoshi
    Kuriu, Yoshiaki
    Ikoma, Hisashi
    Nakanishi, Masayoshi
    Otsuji, Eigo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (12) : 6843 - 6849
  • [7] The Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Survival and Identifies Aggressiveness of Gastric Cancer
    Eo, Wan Kyu
    Chang, Hye Jung
    Suh, Jungho
    Ahn, Jin
    Shin, Jeong
    Hur, Joon-Young
    Kim, Gou Young
    Lee, Sookyung
    Park, Sora
    Lee, Sanghun
    NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2015, 67 (08): : 1260 - 1267
  • [8] Influence of prognostic nutritional index and tumor markers on survival in gastric cancer surgery patients
    Saito, Hiroaki
    Kono, Yusuke
    Murakami, Yuki
    Kuroda, Hirohiko
    Matsunaga, Tomoyuki
    Fukumoto, Yoji
    Osaki, Tomohiro
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2017, 402 (03) : 501 - 507
  • [9] Influence of prognostic nutritional index and tumor markers on survival in gastric cancer surgery patients
    Hiroaki Saito
    Yusuke Kono
    Yuki Murakami
    Hirohiko Kuroda
    Tomoyuki Matsunaga
    Yoji Fukumoto
    Tomohiro Osaki
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2017, 402 : 501 - 507
  • [10] The prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
    Ucar, Gokhan
    Ergun, Yakup
    Acikgoz, Yusuf
    Uncu, Dogan
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 (05) : E179 - E184