Combined screening with mammography and ultrasound in a population-based screening program

被引:49
作者
Buchberger, Wolfgang [1 ,2 ]
Geiger-Gritsch, Sabine [2 ,3 ]
Knapp, Rudolf [4 ]
Gautsch, Kurt [5 ]
Oberaigner, Willi [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tirol Kliniken Ltd, Med Dept, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] UMIT Univ Hlth Sci Med Informat & Technol, Dept Publ Hlth, Hlth Serv Res & Hlth Technol Assessment, Eduard Wallnofer Zentrum 1, A-6060 Hall In Tirol, Austria
[3] Tirol Kliniken Ltd, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Kufstein Cty Hosp, Dept Radiol, Endachstr 27, A-6330 Kufstein, Austria
[5] Innsbruck Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Mammography; Ultrasound; Breast density; Sensitivity; Specificity; INTERVAL BREAST CANCERS; DENSE BREASTS; WOMEN; SONOGRAPHY; US; METAANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.022
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the performance of screening with mammography combined with ultrasound versus mammography alone in women at average risk for breast cancer. Methods: 66,680 women underwent physician-performed ultrasound as an adjunct to screening mammography. Histological results and follow-up at one year were used as reference standard for sensitivity. Main outcome measures were cancer detection rate, sensitivity, recall rate, biopsy rate, and positive predictive value of biopsy for combined screening with mammography plus ultrasound versus mammography alone. Results: The overall sensitivity of mammography only was 61.5% in women with dense breasts and 86.6% in women with non-dense breasts. The sensitivity of mammography plus ultrasound combined was 81.3% in women with dense breasts and 95.0% in women with non-dense breasts. Adjunctive ultrasound increased the recall rate from 10.5 to 16.5 per 1000 women screened, and increased the biopsy rate from 6.3 to 9.3 per 1000 women screened. The positive predictive value of biopsy was 55.5% (95% CI 50.6%-60.3%) for mammography alone and 43.3 (95% CI 39.4%-47.3%) for combined mammography plus ultrasound. Conclusions: Supplemental ultrasound improves cancer detection in screening of women at average risk for breast cancer. Recall rates and biopsy rates can be kept within acceptable limits.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 29
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [21] Perry N., 2006, EUROPEAN GUIDELINES
  • [22] Sickles E. A., 2013, ACR BI RADS MMAMMOGR
  • [23] The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned?
    Smith, RA
    Duffy, SW
    Gabe, R
    Tabar, L
    Yen, AMF
    Chen, THH
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 42 (05) : 793 - +
  • [24] Is full-field digital mammography more accurate than screen-film mammography in overall population screening? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Souza, Fabiano H.
    Wendland, Eliana M.
    Rosa, Maria I.
    Polanczyk, Carisi A.
    [J]. BREAST, 2013, 22 (03) : 217 - 224
  • [25] WHAT IS THE OPTIMUM INTERVAL BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING EXAMINATIONS - AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE LATEST RESULTS OF THE SWEDISH 2-COUNTY BREAST-CANCER SCREENING TRIAL
    TABAR, L
    FABERBERG, G
    DAY, NE
    HOLMBERG, L
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1987, 55 (05) : 547 - 551
  • [26] Age-specific interval breast cancers in New South Wales and meta-analysis of studies of women aged 40-49 years
    Taylor, R
    Page, A
    Bampton, D
    Estoesta, J
    Rickard, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2004, 11 (04) : 199 - 206
  • [27] The Connecticut Experiment: The Role of Ultrasound in the Screening of Women With Dense Breasts
    Weigert, Jean
    Steenbergen, Sarah
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2012, 18 (06) : 517 - 522
  • [28] Performance of hand-held whole-breast ultrasound based on BI-RADS in women with mammographically negative dense breast
    Youk, Ji Hyun
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    Kim, Min Jung
    Kwak, Jin Young
    Son, Eun Ju
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (04) : 667 - 675