Outcome of Microscopic Incomplete Resection (R1) of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

被引:117
作者
Ayez, Ninos [1 ]
Lalmahomed, Zarina S. [2 ]
Eggermont, Alexander M. M. [3 ]
Ijzermans, Jan N. M. [2 ]
de Jonge, Jeroen [1 ,2 ]
van Montfort, Kees [4 ]
Verhoef, Cornelis [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dr Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Div Surg Oncol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Div Transplantat & Hepatobiliary Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Inst Cancerol Gustav Roussy, Villejuif, France
[4] Erasmus MC, Dr Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Div Biostat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; SURGICAL MARGIN STATUS; HEPATIC RESECTION; PERIOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; CLINICAL SCORE; CANCER; CARCINOMA; RECURRENCE; HEPATECTOMY;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-011-2114-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Data from patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before resection were reviewed and evaluated to see whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy influences the predictive outcome of R1 resections (margin is 0 mm) in patients with CRLM. Between January 2000 and December 2008, all consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for CRLM were analyzed. Patients were divided into those who did and did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The outcome after R0 (tumor-free margin > 0 mm) and R1 (tumor-free margin 0 mm) resection was compared. A total of 264 were eligible for analysis. Median follow-up was 34 months. Patients without chemotherapy showed a significant difference in median disease-free survival (DFS) after R0 or R1 resection: 17 [95% confidence interval (CI) 10-24] months versus 8 (95% CI 4-12) months (P < 0.001), whereas in patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy the difference in DFS between R0 and R1 resection was not significant: 18 (95% CI 10-26) months versus 9 (95% CI 0-20) months (P = 0.303). Patients without chemotherapy showed a significant difference in median overall survival (OS) after R0 or R1 resection: 53 (95% CI 40-66) months versus 30 (95% CI 13-47) months (P < 0.001). In patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the median OS showed no significant difference: 65 (95% CI 39-92) months for the R0 group versus the R1 group, in whom the median OS was not reached (P = 0.645). In patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, R1 resection was of no predictive value for DFS and OS.
引用
收藏
页码:1618 / 1627
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Chemotherapy and surgery: new perspectives on the treatment of unresectable liver metastases [J].
Adam, R .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 :13-16
[2]  
Adam R, 2001, ANN SURG ONCOL, V8, P347
[3]   Is Perioperative Chemotherapy Useful for Solitary, Metachronous, Colorectal Liver Metastases? [J].
Adam, Rene ;
Bhangui, Prashant ;
Poston, Graeme ;
Mirza, Darius ;
Nuzzo, Gennaro ;
Barroso, Eduardo ;
Ijzermans, Jan ;
Hubert, Catherine ;
Ruers, Theo ;
Capussotti, Lorenzo ;
Ouellet, Jean-Francois ;
Laurent, Christophe ;
Cugat, Esteban ;
Colombo, Pierre Emmanuel ;
Milicevic, Miroslav .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (05) :774-785
[4]   Importance of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases [J].
Allen, PJ ;
Kemeny, N ;
Jarnagin, W ;
DeMatteo, R ;
Blumgart, L ;
Fong, Y .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2003, 7 (01) :109-115
[5]  
[Anonymous], P AM SOC CLIN ONCOL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, P AM SOC CLIN
[7]  
BENGMARK S, 1969, CANCER, V23, P198, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(196901)23:1<198::AID-CNCR2820230126>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-J
[9]   Complete response of colorectal liver metastases after chemotherapy:: Does it mean cure? [J].
Benoist, Stephane ;
Brouquet, Antoine ;
Penna, Christophe ;
Julie, Catherine ;
El Hajjam, Mostafa ;
Chagnon, Sophie ;
Mitry, Emmanuel ;
Rougier, Philippe ;
Nordlinger, Bernard .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (24) :3939-3945
[10]   Size of surgical margin does not influence recurrence rates after curative liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases [J].
Bodingbauer, M. ;
Tamandl, D. ;
Schmid, K. ;
Plank, C. ;
Schimai, W. ;
Gruenberger, T. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (09) :1133-1138