The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): AMEE Guide No. 81. Part I: An historical and theoretical perspective

被引:289
作者
Khan, Kamran Z. [1 ]
Ramachandran, Sankaranarayanan [2 ]
Gaunt, Kathryn [2 ]
Pushkar, Piyush [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Preston, Lancs, England
[2] Lancashire Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Preston, Lancs, England
[3] Aintree Univ Hosp Trust, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
MEDICAL-EDUCATION; GENERAL-PRACTICE; FACE VALIDITY; COMPETENCE; SKILLS; ASSESSMENTS; PERFORMANCE; COUNCIL;
D O I
10.3109/0142159X.2013.818634
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) was first described by Harden in 1975 as an alternative to the existing methods of assessing clinical performance (Harden et al. 1975). The OSCE was designed to improve the validity and reliability of assessment of performance, which was previously assessed using the long case and short case examinations. Since then the use of the OSCE has become widespread within both undergraduate and postgraduate clinical education. We recognise that the introduction of the OSCE into an existing assessment programme is a challenging process requiring a considerable amount of theoretical and practical knowledge. The two parts of this Guide are designed to assist all those who intend implementing the OSCE into their assessment systems. Part I addresses the theoretical aspects of the OSCE, exploring its historical development, its place within the range of assessment tools and its core applications. Part II offers more practical information on the process of implementing an OSCE, including guidance on developing OSCE stations, choosing scoring rubrics, training examiners and standardised patients and managing quality assurance processes. Together we hope these two parts will act as a useful resource both for those choosing to implement the OSCE for the first time and also those wishing to quality assure their existing OSCE programme.
引用
收藏
页码:E1437 / E1446
页数:10
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], TAXONOMY ED OBJECTIV
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, STAND ED PSYCH TEST
[3]   Value and face validity of objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) for work based assessment of surgical skills in obstetrics and gynaecology [J].
Bodle, J. F. ;
Kaufmann, S. J. ;
Bisson, D. ;
Nathanson, B. ;
Binney, D. M. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2008, 30 (02) :212-216
[4]  
Boursicot Katharine, 2011, Med Teach, V33, P370, DOI 10.3109/0142159X.2011.565831
[5]   Structured assessments of clinical competence [J].
Boursicot, Katharine A. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2010, 71 (06) :342-344
[6]  
Brazeau Chantal, 2002, Acad Med, V77, P932, DOI 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00036
[7]   The objective structured clinical examination - A step in the direction of competency-based evaluation [J].
Carraccio, C ;
Englander, R .
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2000, 154 (07) :736-741
[8]  
Downing S.M., 2010, VALIDITY ESTABLISHIN
[9]   Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data [J].
Downing, SM .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2003, 37 (09) :830-837
[10]  
Dreyfus S. E., 1980, A five-stage model of mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition