Children and safety in Australian policy: Implications for organisations and practitioners

被引:9
作者
Powell, Mary Ann [1 ]
Graham, Anne [2 ]
Canosa, Antonia [2 ]
Anderson, Donnah [3 ]
Taylor, Nicola [4 ]
Robinson, Sally [5 ]
Moore, Tim [6 ]
Thomas, Nigel Patrick [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Moray House Sch Educ & Sport, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Southern Cross Univ, Ctr Children & Young People, Coolangatta, Qld, Australia
[3] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Psychol, Albury, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Otago, Childrens Issues Ctr, Fac Law, Dunedin, New Zealand
[5] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Univ South Australia, Australian Ctr Child Protect, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[7] Univ Cent Lancashire, Sch Social Work, Ctr Children & Young Peoples Participat, Preston, Lancs, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
child safety; children; policy; rights; protection; PROTECTION; CHILDHOOD; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/ajs4.134
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Child safety is now a national policy priority in Australia. Extensive enquiries and reviews have escalated legislative and policy responses focused on developing, maintaining and monitoring "child safe" organisations. The recommendations of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse point to the importance of cultural conditions within organisations in supporting child safety and the need for responsive change in some organisations. Drawing on a recent policy analysis, undertaken as part of a larger Australian Research Council Discovery Project, this article examines how children and safety are constructed, within and across relevant state and federal government policies in Australia, and the implications of this. Distinctions are drawn between conceptualisations of children within the broader education policy context and two specific policy contexts in which children are considered particularly vulnerable to abuse - out-of-home care and disability. The findings indicate that policy discourses of "child safe" potentially foster different emphases and approaches in organisations. These have implications for the way children are positioned in relation to their safety, how their rights are recognised and implemented, and what is required to foster cultural conditions within organisations to best support children's safety and wellbeing.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 41
页数:25
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] ACT Government Community Services, 2015, STEP OUR KIDS OUT HO
  • [2] ACT Government Education Directorate, 2016, SAF SUPP SCH POL
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, PROTECTING CHILDREN
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, PICT AUSTR CHILDR 20
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, DIS STAND ED
  • [6] Archard David., 2014, CHILDREN RIGHTS CHIL, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315740676
  • [7] Australian Children's Commissioners and Guardians, 2013, 3 AUSTR CHILDR COMM
  • [8] Australian Government Department of Social Services, 2012, PROT CHILDR EV BUS N
  • [9] Australian Government Department of Social Services, 2009, NAT FRAM PROT AUSTR
  • [10] Australian Government Department of Social Services, 2016, NDIS QUAL SAF FRAM