Clinical experience using Delta 4 phantom for pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance in modern radiotherapy

被引:9
|
作者
Srivastava, R. P. [1 ,3 ]
De Wagter, C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, C Heymanslaan 10,Radiotherapiepk, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol & Expt Canc Res, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Ctr Hosp Mouscron, Radiotherapy Assoc Meuse Picardie, Mouscron, Belgium
关键词
gamma index; intensity-modulated radiation therapy; multi-leaf collimator; quality assurance; volumetric-modulated arc therapy;
D O I
10.1017/S1460396918000572
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose In advanced radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the quality assurance (QA) process is essential. The aim of the study was to assure the treatment planning dose delivered during delivery of complex treatment plans. The QA standard is to perform patient-specific comparisons between planned doses and doses measured in a phantom. Materials and method The Delta 4 phantom (Scandidos, Uppsala, Sweden) has been used in this study. This device consists of diode matrices in two orthogonal planes inserted in a cylindrical acrylic phantom. Each diode is sampled per beam pulse so that the dose distribution can be evaluated on segment-by-segment, beam-by-beam, or as a composite plan from a single set of measurements. Ninety-five simple and complex radiotherapy treatment plans for different pathologies, planned using a treatment planning system (TPS) were delivered to the QA device. The planned and measured dose distributions were then compared and analysed. The gamma index was determined for different pathologies. Results The evaluation was performed in terms of dose deviation, distance to agreement and gamma index passing rate. The measurements were in excellent agreement between with the calculated dose of the TPS and the QA device. Overall, good agreement was observed between measured and calculated doses in most cases with gamma values above 1 in >95% of measured points. Plan results for each test met the recommended dose goals. Conclusion The delivery of IMRT and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans was verified to correspond well with calculated dose distributions for different pathologies. We found the Delta 4 device is accurate and reproducible. Although Delta4 appears to be a straightforward device for measuring dose and allows measure in real-time dosimetry QA, it is a complex device and careful quality control is required before its use.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 214
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-specific quality assurance for intracranial cases in robotic radiosurgery system
    Koksal, Canan
    Akbas, Ugur
    Kesen, Nazmiye Donmez
    Okutan, Murat
    Bilge, Hatice
    Kemikler, Gonul
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2018, 23 (01): : 179 - 184
  • [22] A prospective study on the effect of tumor shrinkage on exit fluence gamma pass rate in high precision radiotherapy and influence of phantom setup error in patient-specific quality assurance
    Tiwari, Arnav
    Das, Saikat
    Pandey, Vindhyavasini P.
    Kharade, Vipin
    Gupta, Manish
    Pasricha, Rajesh
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 20 (03) : 935 - 942
  • [23] Bulk Anatomical Density Based Dose Calculation for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of MRI-Only Prostate Radiotherapy
    Choi, Jae Hyuk
    Lee, Danny
    O'Connor, Laura
    Chalup, Stephan
    Welsh, James S.
    Dowling, Jason
    Greer, Peter B.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [24] A retrospective analysis for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans
    Li, Guangjun
    Wu, Kui
    Peng, Guang
    Zhang, Yingjie
    Bai, Sen
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (04) : 309 - 313
  • [25] Which failures do patient-specific quality assurance systems need to catch?
    O'Daniel, Jennifer
    Masgrau, Victor Hernandez
    Clark, Catharine
    Esposito, Marco
    Lehmann, Joerg
    Mcniven, Andrea
    Olaciregui-Ruiz, Igor
    Kry, Stephen
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, : 88 - 98
  • [26] Development of in-house heterogeneous thorax phantom and evaluation of pretreatment patient-specific transit dosimetry for intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy plans
    Bagdare, Priyusha
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (04) : 1098 - 1104
  • [27] A Systematic Approach to Patient-Specific Quality Assurance for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    SONG Yu-lin
    Ceferino Obcemea
    Boris Mueller
    Borys Mychalczak
    Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2015, 24 (02) : 58 - 65
  • [28] Comparison of action levels for patient-specific quality assurance of intensity modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy treatments
    Mancuso, Gordon M.
    Fontenot, Jonas D.
    Gibbons, John P.
    Parker, Brent C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (07) : 4378 - 4385
  • [29] Prediction of patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric modulated arc therapy using radiomics-based machine learning with dose distribution
    Ishizaka, Natsuki
    Kinoshita, Tomotaka
    Sakai, Madoka
    Tanabe, Shunpei
    Nakano, Hisashi
    Tanabe, Satoshi
    Nakamura, Sae
    Mayumi, Kazuki
    Akamatsu, Shinya
    Nishikata, Takayuki
    Takizawa, Takeshi
    Yamada, Takumi
    Sakai, Hironori
    Kaidu, Motoki
    Sasamoto, Ryuta
    Ishikawa, Hiroyuki
    Utsunomiya, Satoru
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [30] Efficient dose-volume histogram-based pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance methodology with combined deep learning and machine learning models for volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy
    Gong, Changfei
    Zhu, Kecheng
    Lin, Chengyin
    Han, Ce
    Lu, Zhongjie
    Chen, Yuanhua
    Yu, Changhui
    Hou, Liqiao
    Zhou, Yongqiang
    Yi, Jinling
    Ai, Yao
    Xiang, Xiaojun
    Xie, Congying
    Jin, Xiance
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (12) : 7779 - 7790