Clinical experience using Delta 4 phantom for pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance in modern radiotherapy

被引:9
|
作者
Srivastava, R. P. [1 ,3 ]
De Wagter, C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, C Heymanslaan 10,Radiotherapiepk, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol & Expt Canc Res, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Ctr Hosp Mouscron, Radiotherapy Assoc Meuse Picardie, Mouscron, Belgium
关键词
gamma index; intensity-modulated radiation therapy; multi-leaf collimator; quality assurance; volumetric-modulated arc therapy;
D O I
10.1017/S1460396918000572
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose In advanced radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the quality assurance (QA) process is essential. The aim of the study was to assure the treatment planning dose delivered during delivery of complex treatment plans. The QA standard is to perform patient-specific comparisons between planned doses and doses measured in a phantom. Materials and method The Delta 4 phantom (Scandidos, Uppsala, Sweden) has been used in this study. This device consists of diode matrices in two orthogonal planes inserted in a cylindrical acrylic phantom. Each diode is sampled per beam pulse so that the dose distribution can be evaluated on segment-by-segment, beam-by-beam, or as a composite plan from a single set of measurements. Ninety-five simple and complex radiotherapy treatment plans for different pathologies, planned using a treatment planning system (TPS) were delivered to the QA device. The planned and measured dose distributions were then compared and analysed. The gamma index was determined for different pathologies. Results The evaluation was performed in terms of dose deviation, distance to agreement and gamma index passing rate. The measurements were in excellent agreement between with the calculated dose of the TPS and the QA device. Overall, good agreement was observed between measured and calculated doses in most cases with gamma values above 1 in >95% of measured points. Plan results for each test met the recommended dose goals. Conclusion The delivery of IMRT and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans was verified to correspond well with calculated dose distributions for different pathologies. We found the Delta 4 device is accurate and reproducible. Although Delta4 appears to be a straightforward device for measuring dose and allows measure in real-time dosimetry QA, it is a complex device and careful quality control is required before its use.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 214
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-specific radiotherapy quality assurance for estimating actual treatment dose
    Tanabe, Yoshinori
    Ishida, Takayuki
    Eto, Hidetoshi
    Sera, Tatsuhiro
    Emoto, Yuki
    Shimokawa, Mototsugu
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2021, 46 (01) : e5 - e10
  • [2] Gamma Index Analysis as a Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Tool for High-Precision Radiotherapy: A Clinical Perspective of Single Institute Experience
    Das, Saikat
    Kharade, Vipin
    Pandey, V. P.
    Anju, K., V
    Pasricha, Rajesh K.
    Gupta, Manish
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [3] Deep Hybrid Learning Prediction of Patient-Specific Quality Assurance in Radiotherapy: Implementation in Clinical Routine
    Moreau, Noemie
    Bonnor, Laurine
    Jaudet, Cyril
    Lechippey, Laetitia
    Falzone, Nadia
    Batalla, Alain
    Bertaut, Cindy
    Corroyer-Dulmont, Aurelien
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (05)
  • [4] Evaluation of Delta4DVH Anatomy in 3D Patient-Specific IMRT Quality Assurance
    Tang, Du
    Yang, Zhen
    Dai, Xunzhang
    Cao, Ying
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2020, 19
  • [5] Clinical Efficacy of an Electronic Portal Imaging Device versus a Physical Phantom Tool for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance
    Baek, Seung-Hyeop
    Choi, Sang-Hyoun
    Han, Moo-Jae
    Cho, Gyu-Seok
    Jang, Wonil
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    Kim, Kum-Bae
    LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [6] Clinical performance of FractionLab in patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiotherapy : a retrospective study
    Oh, Se An
    Kim, Sung Yeop
    Park, Jaehyeon
    Park, Jae Won
    Yea, Ji Woon
    JOURNAL OF YEUNGNAM MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 39 (02): : 108 - 115
  • [7] Invertible and Variable Augmented Network for Pretreatment Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Dose Prediction
    Zou, Zhongsheng
    Gong, Changfei
    Zeng, Lingpeng
    Guan, Yu
    Huang, Bin
    Yu, Xiuwen
    Liu, Qiegen
    Zhang, Minghui
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 37 (01): : 60 - 71
  • [8] Therapeutic dose prediction using score-based diffusion model for pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance
    Yu, Xiuwen
    Lin, Jiabin
    Gong, Changfei
    Zhang, Minhui
    Luo, Xianyu
    Liu, Qiegen
    Zhang, Yun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2025, 14
  • [9] Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Protocol for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy using Dose Volume Histogram
    Low, Christopher
    Toye, Warren
    Phung, Peter
    Huston, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 43 (02) : 112 - 118
  • [10] Field size analysis of patient-specific quality assurance in scanned carbon ion radiotherapy
    Deng, Yu
    Wang, Qianxia
    Huang, Zhijie
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (11) : 6627 - 6633