Fecal Microbiota Characteristics of Patients with Colorectal Adenoma Detected by Screening: A Population-based Study

被引:48
作者
Goedert, James J. [1 ]
Gong, Yangming [2 ]
Hua, Xing [1 ]
Zhong, Huanzi [3 ]
He, Yimin [3 ]
Peng, Peng [2 ]
Yu, Guoqin [1 ]
Wang, Wenjing [2 ]
Ravel, Jacques [4 ]
Shi, Jianxin [1 ]
Zheng, Ying [2 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, 9609 Med Ctr Dr,Room 6E106,MSC 9767, Bethesda, MD 20852 USA
[2] Shanghai Municipal Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] BGI, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Inst Genome Sci, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
来源
EBIOMEDICINE | 2015年 / 2卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Feces; Microbiota; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal adenoma; Cancer screening; China; HUMAN GUT MICROBIOME; CANCER DEATHS; BACTERIAL; RISK; ASSOCIATION; POLYPECTOMY; BIOMARKERS; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.04.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) and precancerous colorectal adenoma (CRA) can detect curable disease. However, participation in colonoscopy and sensitivity of fecal heme for CRA are low. Methods: Microbiota metrics were determined by Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA genes amplified from DNA extracted from feces self-collected in RNAlater. Among fecal immunochemical test-positive (FIT+) participants, colonoscopically-defined normal versus CRA patients were compared by regression, permutation, and random forest plus leave-one-out methods. Findings: Of 95 FIT+ participants, 61 had successful fecal microbiota profiling and colonoscopy, identifying 24 completely normal patients, 20 CRA patients, 2 CRC patients, and 15 with other conditions. Phylum-level fecal community composition differed significantly between CRA and normal patients (permutation P = 0.02). Rank phylum-level abundance distinguished CRA from normal patients (area under the curve = 0.767, permutation P = 0.006). CRA prevalence was 59% in phylum-level cluster B versus 20% in cluster A (exact P = 0.01). Most of the difference reflected 3-fold higher median relative abundance of Proteobacteria taxa (Wilcoxon signed-rank P = 0.03, positive predictive value = 67%). Antibiotic exposure and other potential confounders did not affect the associations. Interpretation: If confirmed in larger, more diverse populations, fecal microbiota analysis might be employed to improve screening for CRA and ultimately to reduce mortality from CRC. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 603
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fecal Immunochemical Test Positivity Thresholds: An International Survey of Population-Based Screening Programs
    Young, Graeme P.
    Benton, Sally C.
    Bresalier, Robert S.
    Chiu, Han-Mo
    Dekker, Evelien
    Fraser, Callum G.
    Frasa, Marieke A. M.
    Halloran, Stephen P.
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    Parry, Susan
    Selby, Kevin
    Senore, Carlo
    Singh, Harminder
    Symonds, Erin L.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2024, : 1637 - 1645
  • [32] Colorectal cancer surveillance by colonoscopy in a prospective, population-based long-term Swiss screening study - outcomes, adherence, and costs
    Zgraggen, Armin
    Stoffel, Sandro Tiziano
    Barbier, Michaela Carla
    Marbet, Urs Albert
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2022, 60 (05): : 761 - 778
  • [33] Trends in colonoscopy and fecal occult blood test use after the introduction of dual screening offers in Germany: Results from a large population-based study, 2003-2016
    Chen, Chen
    Stock, Christian
    Jansen, Lina
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    Brenner, Hermann
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 123 : 333 - 340
  • [34] Factors associated with perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a population-based study
    Huang, Junjie
    Wang, Jingxuan
    Huang, Jason
    Lok, Veeleah
    Pang, Tiffany
    Choi, Peter
    Leung, Colette
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 : 161 - 161
  • [35] Colorectal Cancer Risk Following Adenoma Removal: A Large Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study
    Coleman, Helen G.
    Loughrey, Maurice B.
    Murray, Liam J.
    Johnston, Brian T.
    Gavin, Anna T.
    Shrubsole, Martha J.
    Bhat, Shivaram K.
    Allen, Patrick B.
    McConnell, Vivienne
    Cantwell, Marie M.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2015, 24 (09) : 1373 - 1380
  • [36] Dietary patterns and colorectal cancer: results from a Canadian population-based study
    Chen, Zhi
    Wang, Peizhong Peter
    Woodrow, Jennifer
    Zhu, Yun
    Roebothan, Barbara
    Mclaughlin, John R.
    Parfrey, Patrick S.
    NUTRITION JOURNAL, 2015, 14
  • [37] Salivary and fecal microbiota: potential new biomarkers for early screening of colorectal polyps
    Zhang, Limin
    Feng, Ziying
    Li, Yinghua
    Lv, Cuiting
    Li, Chunchun
    Hu, Yue
    Fu, Mingsheng
    Song, Liang
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [38] Identifying nursing activities in population-based colorectal and breast cancer screening programs in Spain: A Delphi study
    Benito, Llucia
    Binefa, Gemma
    Vidal, Carmen
    Lluch, Maria Teresa
    Puig, Montse
    Padrol, Isabel
    Garcia, Montse
    COLLEGIAN, 2017, 24 (04) : 351 - 359
  • [39] Screening for Colorectal Cancer Is Associated With Lower Disease Stage: A Population-Based Study
    Kubisch, Constanze H.
    Crispin, Alexander
    Mansmann, Ulrich
    Goeke, Burkhard
    Kolligs, Frank T.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 14 (11) : 1612 - +
  • [40] Impact of Dementia in Colorectal Cancer Patients: United States Population-Based Cohort Study
    Suenghataiphorn, Thanathip
    Kulthamrongsri, Narathorn
    Danpanichkul, Pojsakorn
    Saowapa, Sakditad
    Polpichai, Natchaya
    Thongpiya, Jerapas
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 84 (01) : 17 - +