Is the Longue Duree a Legal Argument?: Understanding Takings Doctrine in Climate Change and Settler Colonial Contexts in the United States

被引：2

作者：

Marino, Elizabeth ^{[1
]}

Jerolleman, Alessandra ^{[2
,3
]}

Jessee, Nathan ^{[4
]}

Weyiouanna, Annie ^{[5
]}

Topkok, Meghan Sigvana ^{[6
]}

Keene, Eli

Manda, Simon

机构：

[1] Oregon State Univ Cascades, Anthropol & Sustainabil, Bend, OR 97702 USA

[2] Jacksonville State Univ, Emergency Management, Jacksonville, AL USA

[3] Jacksonville State Univ, Doctoral Program, Jacksonville, AL USA

[4] Princeton Univ, High Meadows Environm Inst, Princeton, NJ USA

[5] Shishmaref Native Corp, Shishmaref, AK USA

[6] Kawerak Inc, Nome, AK USA

来源：

HUMAN ORGANIZATION | 2022年 / 81卷 / 04期

基金：

美国国家科学基金会;

关键词：

property law; repetitive flooding; disaster litigation; takings; climate adaptation; ALASKA; REFUGEES;

D O I：

10.17730/1938-3525-81.4.348

中图分类号：

Q98 [人类学];

学科分类号：

030303 ;

摘要：

This article investigates whether it is possible to bring the longue duree, or the re-contextualization of risk distribution and accumulation, into litigation about climate outcomes. We do this by analyzing the structure of disaster litigation to identify if and whether historical harm is included in argumentation and by applying the concept of takings to a hypothetical legal argument of repetitive flooding in Alaska. We conclude that invisibility of historical harm in climate and disaster litigation gives insight into the preference and structure of the law.

引用

页码：348 / 357

页数：10