Systematic review of current prognostication systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

被引:12
作者
Teo, Roxanne Y. A. [1 ]
Teo, Timothy Z. [1 ]
Tai, David W. M. [2 ,3 ]
Tan, Damien M. [4 ]
Ong, Simon [2 ,3 ]
Goh, Brian K. P. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Hepatopancreatobiliary & Transplant Surg, 20 Coll Rd,Acad Level 5, Singapore 169856, Singapore
[2] Natl Canc Ctr, Div Med Oncol, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Duke NUS Med Sch, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; ENDOCRINE TUMORS; 2010; CLASSIFICATION; TNM-CLASSIFICATION; SINGLE INSTITUTION; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; STAGING SYSTEM; HIGH-GRADE; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2018.10.031
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are a heterogenous group of rare tumors whose natural history remains poorly defined. Accurate prognostication of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is essential for guiding clinical decisions. This paper aims to summarize all the commonly utilized and recently proposed prognostication systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms published in the literature to date. Methods: A systematic review of Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase databases, of the period from January 1, 2000-November 29, 2016, was conducted to identify all published articles reporting on prognostication systems of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Results: A total of 23 articles were included in our review, and a total of 25 classification systems were identified. There were 2 modifications of the World Health Organization 2004 criteria, 4 modifications of the World Health Organization 2010 criteria, 2 modifications of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 2010 staging system, 3 modifications of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society 2006 tumor, node, metastasis staging system, 7 novel categorial classification systems, and 2 novel proposed continuous classifications. The most commonly included variables included age, size of tumor, presence of distant and lymph node metastases, Ki-67 index, and mitotic count. Conclusion: Numerous prognostication systems have been proposed for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, of which the most commonly used systems presently include the World Health Organization 2010 criteria and the two tumor, node, metastasis staging systems by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society and the American Joint Commission on Cancer. However, prognostication systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms continue to evolve with time as more prognostication factors are identified. More validation and comparative studies are needed to identify the most effective prognostication system. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 685
页数:14
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Streptozocin and 5-Fluorouracil for the Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Efficacy, Prognostic Factors and Toxicity [J].
Antonodimitrakis, Pantelis Clewemar ;
Sundin, Anders ;
Wassberg, Cecilia ;
Granberg, Dan ;
Skogseid, Britt ;
Eriksson, Barbro .
NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 103 (3-4) :345-353
[2]   A simplified prognostic system for resected pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms [J].
Ballian, Nikiforos ;
Loeffler, Agnes G. ;
Rajamanickam, Victoria ;
Norstedt, Peter A. ;
Weber, Sharon M. ;
Cho, Clifford S. .
HPB, 2009, 11 (05) :422-428
[3]   The High-grade (WHO G3) Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Category Is Morphologically and Biologically Heterogenous and Includes Both Well Differentiated and Poorly Differentiated Neoplasms [J].
Basturk, Olca ;
Yang, Zhaohai ;
Tang, Laura H. ;
Hruban, Ralph H. ;
Adsay, Volkan ;
McCall, Chad M. ;
Krasinskas, Alyssa M. ;
Jang, Kee-Taek ;
Frankel, Wendy L. ;
Balci, Serdar ;
Sigel, Carlie ;
Klimstra, David S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2015, 39 (05) :683-690
[4]   Prognostic factors at diagnosis and value of WHO classification in a mono-institutional series of 180 non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumours [J].
Bettini, R. ;
Boninsegna, L. ;
Mantovani, W. ;
Capelli, P. ;
Bassi, C. ;
Pederzoli, P. ;
Delle Fave, G. F. ;
Panzuto, F. ;
Scarpa, A. ;
Falconi, M. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 (05) :903-908
[5]   Tumor size correlates with malignancy in nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumor [J].
Bettini, Rossella ;
Partelli, Stefano ;
Boninsegna, Letizia ;
Capelli, Paola ;
Crippa, Stefano ;
Pederzoli, Paolo ;
Scarpa, Aldo ;
Falconi, Massimo .
SURGERY, 2011, 150 (01) :75-82
[6]   Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors - Analysis of 3851 patients [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Talamonti, Mark S. ;
Tomlinson, James S. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Winchester, David P. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. ;
Bentrem, David J. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (03) :490-500
[7]   Application of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma staging system to pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Bentrem, David J. ;
Merkow, Ryan P. ;
Tomlinson, James S. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. ;
Talamonti, Mark S. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 205 (04) :558-563
[8]   Surgical Management of Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Short-Term and Long-Term Results from an International Multi-institutional Study [J].
Birnbaum, David Jeremie ;
Turrini, Olivier ;
Vigano, Luca ;
Russolillo, Nadia ;
Autret, Aurelie ;
Moutardier, Vincent ;
Capussotti, Lorenzo ;
Le Treut, Yves-Patrice ;
Delpero, Jean-Robert ;
Hardwigsen, Jean .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (03) :1000-1007
[9]  
Bosman FT, 2010, WHO Classification of tumors of the digestive system
[10]   Developing a multivariable prognostic model for pancreatic endocrine tumors using the clinical data warehouse resources of a single institution [J].
Botsis, Taxiarchis ;
Anagnostou, Valsamo K. ;
Hartvigsen, Gunnar ;
Hripcsak, George ;
Weng, Chunhua .
APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2010, 1 (01) :38-49