Anal Sphincter Length as Determined by3-DimensionalEndoanal Ultrasound and Anal Manometry A Study in Healthy Nulliparous Women

被引:4
|
作者
Norderval, Stig [1 ,3 ]
Pedersen, Torunn K. [2 ]
Collinson, Rowan J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp North Norway, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Sykehusveien 38, N-9019 Tromso, Norway
[2] Univ Hosp North Norway, Outpatient Clin, Div Surg Oncol & Womens Hlth, Tromso, Norway
[3] Arctic Univ Norway, Gastrosurg Res Grp, Dept Clin Med, UiT, Tromso, Norway
[4] Auckland City Hosp, Colorectal Unit, Dept Gen Surg, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
anal manometry; anal sphincter; anal ultrasound; VAGINAL DELIVERY; EXTERNAL SPHINCTER; SCORING SYSTEMS; PRIMARY REPAIR; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; DEFECTS; TEARS; CLASSIFICATION; INCONTINENCE; MORPHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/jum.15407
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives The normal female external anal sphincter (EAS) is shorter anteriorly than laterally and posteriorly. Furthermore, the thickness of the very proximal part of the circular EAS is thinner than 50% of the lateral and posterior EAS thickness. The extent of these features is not fully explored. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the normal anal sphincter with 3-dimensional (3D) endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) and to relate 3D EAUS length measurements to sphincter length determined by anal manometry. Methods Healthy premenopausal nulliparous women underwent anal manometry and 3D EAUS examinations. Two experienced colorectal surgeons independently assessed all scans, blinded to any patient data. Results A total of 43 women were included. Four scans were incomplete and excluded from the analysis. Interobserver agreement was fair to very good for the various length measurements. The mean length from the distal border of the puborectal muscle to the very proximal border of the anterior EAS (the anterior gap) was 4.4 (95% confidence interval, 3.9-4.9) mm, whereas the length to the level where the anterior EAS thickness was at least 50% of the lateral and posterior EAS thickness was 7.2 (95% confidence interval, 6.5-7.9) mm. Manometric sphincter length at rest did not correlate with any 3D EAUS length measurements. Conclusions In the normal anterior female anal canal, the EAS is not present or appears with less than 50% of the thickness of the lateral and posterior EAS for the first 7.2 mm below the distal border of the puborectal muscle.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 339
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Anatomical Disruption and Length-Tension Dysfunction of Anal Sphincter Complex Muscles in Women with Fecal Incontinence
    Kim, Young Sun
    Weinstein, Milena
    Raizada, Varuna
    Jiang, Yanfen
    Bhargava, Valmik
    Rajasekaran, M. Raj
    Mittal, Ravinder K.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (11) : 1282 - 1289
  • [42] Comparison of 3D endoanal ultrasound and external phased array magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries
    Kirss, Jaan, Jr.
    Huhtinen, Heikki
    Niskanen, Eini
    Ruohonen, Jyrki
    Kallio-Packalen, Marja
    Victorzon, Sarita
    Victorzon, Mikael
    Pinta, Tarja
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (10) : 5717 - 5722
  • [43] Assessment of normal anal sphincter anatomy using transanal ultrasonography in healthy Korean volunteers: a retrospective observational study
    Shon, Daeho
    Kim, Sohyun
    Kang, Sung Il
    JOURNAL OF YEUNGNAM MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 39 (03): : 230 - 234
  • [44] Normal Values of Anal Sphincter Biometry by 4-Dimensional Translabial Ultrasound A Retrospective Study of Pregnant Women in Their Third Trimester
    Mendoza, Julie Magpoc
    Fatakia, Friyan Turel
    Atan, Ixora Kamisan
    Dietz, Hans Peter
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (10) : 2733 - 2738
  • [45] To what extent are anorectal function tests comparable? A study comparing digital rectal examination, anal electromyography, 3-dimensional high-resolution anal manometry, and transperineal ultrasound
    L. Dekker
    D. A. van Reijn-Baggen
    I. J. M. Han-Geurts
    R. J. F. Felt-Bersma
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 38
  • [46] To what extent are anorectal function tests comparable? A study comparing digital rectal examination, anal electromyography, 3-dimensional high-resolution anal manometry, and transperineal ultrasound
    Dekker, L.
    van Reijn-Baggen, D. A.
    Han-Geurts, I. J. M.
    Felt-Bersma, R. J. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [47] Lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted delivery in nulliparous women: study protocol on a randomised controlled trial
    Bergendahl, Sandra
    Ankarcrona, Victoria
    Leijonhufvud, Asa
    Hesselman, Susanne
    Karlstrom, Sofie
    Kallner, Helena Kopp
    Wendel, Sophia Brismar
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (03):
  • [48] Women's experiences of obstetric anal sphincter injury and physical therapy interventions - A qualitative study
    Johannesson, Emma
    Sjoberg, Asa-Lena
    Segerbrand, Nena
    Olsen, Monika Fagevik
    Gutke, Annelie
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2022, 26 (02)
  • [49] 'A worse nightmare than expected' - a Swedish qualitative study of women's experiences two months after obstetric anal sphincter muscle injury
    Lindqvist, Maria
    Persson, Margareta
    Nilsson, Margareta
    Uustal, Eva
    Lindberg, Inger
    MIDWIFERY, 2018, 61 : 22 - 28
  • [50] Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury with fundal pressure in second stage of labor: Transperineal ultrasound study
    Oncu, Hande N.
    Aydin, Serdar
    Arioglu, Cagri
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2021, 40 (05) : 1192 - 1199