Settling into the country: Comparison of Clovis and Folsom lithic networks in western North America shows increasing redundancy of toolstone use

被引:17
作者
Buchanan, Briggs [1 ]
Andrews, Brian [2 ]
Kilby, J. David [3 ]
Eren, Metin I. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tulsa, Dept Anthropol, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA
[2] Rogers State Univ, Dept Psychol & Sociol, Claremore, OK 74017 USA
[3] Texas State Univ, Dept Anthropol, San Marcos, TX 78666 USA
[4] Kent State Univ, Dept Anthropol, Kent, OH 44242 USA
[5] Cleveland Museum Nat Hist, Dept Archaeol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Clovis; Folsom; Lithic networks; Network density; Regional adaptation; SOCIAL NETWORKS; GREAT-PLAINS; LAND-USE; VARIABILITY; MOBILITY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaa.2018.10.004
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
The Peopling of the Americas was a multi-millennium process involving both the hunter-gatherer colonization of new landscapes as well as the 'settling in' to local environments. This process is typically identified archaeologically by an increase in the number of recognized point types, site frequency, changes in subsistence patterns, and increased geographic patterning in stone tool variation. Here, we add to this list by examining preferential toolstone use by Clovis and Folsom peoples, reasoning that Folsom groups formed stricter habits of toolstone procurement relative to Clovis people as the former pursued their increasingly familiar seasonal rounds. After generating lithic raw material data from 49 Folsom assemblages, we constructed a 'Folsom lithic network' that we compared to a 'Clovis lithic network', which consisted of 38 assemblages. Our results show that the Folsom lithic network is significantly denser than the Clovis lithic network. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that Folsom people started to form regular habits of toolstone procurement relative to Clovis people. More broadly, our comparison of lithic networks further supports the hypothesis that the Clovis-to-Folsom transition represents the process of foragers increasingly adapting to their local resource distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 42
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Why flute? Folsom point design and adaptation [J].
Ahler, SA ;
Geib, PR .
JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 27 (09) :799-820
[2]  
Amick Daniel S., 1994, THESIS
[3]   Regional patterns of Folsom mobility and land use in the American southwest [J].
Amick, DS .
WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY, 1996, 27 (03) :411-426
[4]  
Anderson DavidG., 1996, The Paleoindian and Early Archaic Southeast, P29
[5]  
Anderson DavidG., 1995, Native American Interaction, P1
[6]  
Anderson DavidG., 2010, ARCHAEOLOGY E N AM, V38, P63
[7]  
Anderson DavidG., 1996, The Paleoindian and Early Archaic Settlement
[8]   Spatial variability in the Folsom archaeological record: A multi-scalar approach [J].
Andrews, Brian N. ;
LaBelle, Jason M. ;
Seebach, John D. .
AMERICAN ANTIQUITY, 2008, 73 (03) :464-490
[9]   The three lives of a uniface [J].
Andrews, Brian N. ;
Knell, Edward J. ;
Eren, Metin I. .
JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 54 :228-236
[10]  
Andrews Brian N., 2010, THESIS