First versus subsequent return-stroke current and field peaks in negative cloud-to-ground lightning discharges

被引:30
作者
Nag, Amitabh [1 ]
Rakov, Vladimir A. [1 ]
Schulz, Wolfgang [4 ]
Saba, Marcelo M. F. [3 ]
Thottappillil, Rajeev [2 ]
Biagi, Christopher J. [1 ]
Oliveira Filho, Alcides [3 ]
Kafri, Ahmad [2 ]
Theethayi, Nelson [2 ]
Gotschl, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Uppsala Univ, Div Elect & Lightning Res, Angstrom Lab, S-75121 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Natl Inst Space Res, BR-12201970 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
[4] Austrian Elect Assoc, OVE ALDIS, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2007JD009729
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
We examine relative magnitudes of electric field peaks of first and subsequent return strokes in negative cloud-to-ground lightning flashes recorded in Florida, Austria, Brazil, and Sweden. On average, the electric field peak of the first stroke is appreciably, 1.7 to 2.4 times, larger than the field peak of the subsequent stroke ( except for studies in Austria where the ratio varies from 1.0 to 2.3, depending on methodology and instrumentation). Similar results were previously reported from electric field studies in Florida, Sweden, and Sri Lanka. For comparison, directly measured peak currents for first strokes are, on average, a factor of 2.3 to 2.5 larger than those for subsequent strokes. There are some discrepancies between first versus subsequent stroke intensities reported from different studies based on data reported by lightning locating systems (LLS). The ratio of LLS-reported peak currents for first and subsequent strokes confirmed by video records is 1.7 to 2.1 in Brazil, while in the United States ( Arizona, Texas, Oklahoma, and the Great Plains) it varies from 1.1 to 1.6, depending on methodology used. The smaller ratios derived from the LLS studies are likely to be due to poor detection of relatively small subsequent strokes. The smaller values in Austria are possibly related ( at least in part) to the higher percentage ( about 50% versus 24-38% in other studies) of flashes with at least one subsequent stroke greater than the first. The effects of excluding single-stroke flashes or subsequent strokes in newly formed channels appear to be relatively small.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Procedure to Infer Lightning Return-Stroke Current Waveform From Far-Field Waveform for the Case of Lossy Ground
    Koike, Shunsuke
    Fukuyama, Masahiro
    Baba, Yoshihiro
    Tsuboi, Toshihiro
    Rakov, Vladimir A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, 2024, 66 (02) : 525 - 531
  • [32] Observation of a gamma-ray flash at ground level in association with a cloud-to-ground lightning return stroke
    Dwyer, J. R.
    Schaal, M. M.
    Cramer, E.
    Arabshahi, S.
    Liu, N.
    Rassoul, H. K.
    Hill, J. D.
    Jordan, D. M.
    Uman, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2012, 117
  • [33] Parameters of radio pulses of cloud-to-ground multiple-stroke lightning discharges in Northeast Asia
    L. D. Tarabukina
    V. I. Kozlov
    Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 2016, 52 : 271 - 276
  • [34] Submicrosecond fields radiated during the onset of first return strokes in cloud-to-ground lightning
    Krider, EP
    Leteinturier, C
    Willett, JC
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D1) : 1589 - 1597
  • [35] Wavelet-based multifractal analysis of the radiation field of first return stroke in cloud-to-ground discharge
    Gou Xue-Qiang
    Zhang Yi-Jun
    Dong Wan-Sheng
    Qie Xiu-Shu
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2007, 50 (01): : 101 - 105
  • [36] Parameters of the Lightning Attachment Processes in a Negative Cloud-To-Ground Stroke Observed on a Microsecond Timescale
    Nag, Amitabh
    Khounate, Hamza
    Cummins, Kenneth L.
    Goldberg, Dylan J.
    Imam, Abdullah Y.
    Plaisir, Mathieu N.
    Rassoul, Hamid K.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 50 (16)
  • [37] Pulse trains that are characteristic of preliminary breakdown in cloud-to-ground lightning but are not followed by return stroke pulses
    Nag, Amitabh
    Rakov, Vladimir A.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2008, 113 (D1)
  • [38] Some features of stepped and dart-stepped leaders near the ground in natural negative cloud-to-ground lightning discharges
    Qie, X
    Yu, Y
    Guo, C
    Laroche, P
    Zhang, G
    Zhang, Q
    ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2002, 20 (06) : 863 - 870
  • [39] Subionospheric propagation and peak currents of preliminary breakdown pulses before negative cloud-to-ground lightning discharges
    Kolmasova, Ivana
    Santolik, Ondrej
    Farges, Thomas
    Cummer, Steven A.
    Lan, Radek
    Uhlir, Ludek
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 43 (03) : 1382 - 1391
  • [40] Why do oceanic negative cloud-to-ground lightning exhibit larger peak current values?
    Chronis, T.
    Koshak, W.
    McCaul, E.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2016, 121 (08) : 4049 - 4068