Mentoring for Responsible Research: The Creation of a Curriculum for Faculty to Teach RCR in the Research Environment

被引:20
作者
Plemmons, Dena K. [1 ]
Kalichman, Michael W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Res Eth Educ Program, 900 Univ Ave,133 Univ Off Bldg, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Res Eth Program, 9500 Gilman Dr,MC 0612, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Research ethics; Responsible conduct of research; Curriculum development; Mentoring; GRADUATE-STUDENTS; REPORTED GOALS; RESEARCH COURSES; NATIONAL-SURVEY; CONDUCT; INSTRUCTION; ETHICS; SCIENTISTS; KNOWLEDGE; SCIENCES;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-017-9897-z
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite more than 25 years of a requirement for training in the responsible conduct of research (RCR), there is still little consensus about what such training should include, how it should be delivered, nor what constitutes "effectiveness" of such training. This lack of consensus on content, approaches and outcomes is evident in recent data showing high variability in the development and implementation of RCR instruction across universities and programs. If we accept that one of the primary aims of instruction in RCR/research ethics is "to foster a community of social responsibility" (Antes et al. 2009: 398), then it makes sense to consider the research environment itself-where learning one's science happens where one also engages in social interaction around that science. In order to take the best advantage of that already existing/naturally occurring research environment, the authors, through a deliberative, collaborative, and integrative process, crafted a workshop curriculum meant to arm research faculty with concrete and specific tools to effectively introduce research ethics in the context of the research environment.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 226
页数:20
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists [J].
Anderson, Melissa S. ;
Horn, Aaron S. ;
Risbey, Kelly R. ;
Ronning, Emily A. ;
De Vries, Raymond ;
Martinson, Brian C. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2007, 82 (09) :853-860
[2]  
Anderson MS, 2011, CREATING THE ETHICAL ACADEMY: A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING MISCONDUCT AND EMPOWERING CHANGE IN HIGHER EDUCATION, P83
[3]   DISCIPLINARY AND DEPARTMENTAL EFFECTS ON OBSERVATIONS OF FACULTY AND GRADUATE STUDENT MISCONDUCT [J].
ANDERSON, MS ;
LOUIS, KS ;
EARLE, J .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 1994, 65 (03) :330-350
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, P 1 ORI RES C RES IN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, UPD REQ INSTR RESP C
[7]  
[Anonymous], INVESTIGATING RES IN
[8]  
[Anonymous], ETH ED SCI ENG RES W
[9]   A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences [J].
Antes, Alison L. ;
Murphy, Stephen T. ;
Waples, Ethan P. ;
Mumford, Michael D. ;
Brown, Ryan P. ;
Connelly, Shane ;
Devenport, Lynn D. .
ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2009, 19 (05) :379-402
[10]  
Bebeau M. J., 1995, MORAL REASONING SCI, P83