No effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on contrast sensitivity function

被引:7
作者
He, Qing [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Bo-Rong [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Jin [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Ying-Zhen [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Fang-Fang [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Chang-Bing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; tDCS; contrast sensitivity function; CSF; vision; non-invasive brain stimulation; RANDOM NOISE STIMULATION; VISUAL-CORTEX; MOTOR CORTEX; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; PHOSPHENE THRESHOLDS; MOTION PERCEPTION; MODULATION; EXCITABILITY; TDCS; NEUROPLASTICITY;
D O I
10.3233/RNN-180881
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a well-established non-invasive brain stimulation technique that has been widely applied to modulate cortical excitability in human brain. The results of previous tDCS studies on modulating contrast sensitivity, one of the most fundamental visual functions, were mixed. Objective: We aim to systematically investigate the effects of anodal tDCS on contrast sensitivity functions (CSF), evaluate the responsiveness explanation of tDCS effects, and discuss results along with measurement precision. Methods: We designed a single-blinded, sham-controlled within-subject study. Twenty-seven healthy adult subjects received three sets of 15 min tDCS (two 2-mA anodal and one sham) that delivered at Oz, with CSF measured before and after each tDCS stimulation. Experimental sessions were separated by at least twenty-four hours. CSF was assessed with a Bayesian procedure that accurately estimated CSF within minutes. The anodal tDCS-induced effect was gauged with the change in CSF after stimulation; responsiveness was indexed by correlation between CSF changes in different stimulation; precision was calculated from resampling. Results: Our results indicated that neither the first nor the second session anodal tDCS altered the CSF significantly. Responsiveness was inconsistent between the two anodal sessions, indicating the usual responder/non-responder explanation of tDCS effects was unconvincing. Precision was less than 2 dB and constant throughout the whole experiment. Conclusions: The anodal tDCS, at least with two sessions, has no effect on modulating CSF. The absence of anodal tDCS effect on CSF was not due to subject's responsiveness to tDCS or measurement precision. More studies were needed to determine the optimal vision modulation configuration.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 118
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
[21]   Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation impairs the practice-dependent proficiency increase in working memory [J].
Ferrucci, R. ;
Marceglia, S. ;
Vergari, M. ;
Cogiamanian, F. ;
Mrakic-Sposta, S. ;
Mameli, F. ;
Zago, S. ;
Barbieri, S. ;
Priori, A. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 20 (09) :1687-1697
[22]   Random Noise Stimulation Improves Neuroplasticity in Perceptual Learning [J].
Fertonani, Anna ;
Pirulli, Cornelia ;
Miniussi, Carlo .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 31 (43) :15416-15423
[23]   Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory [J].
Fregni, F ;
Boggio, PS ;
Nitsche, M ;
Bermpohl, F ;
Antal, A ;
Feredoes, E ;
Marcolin, MA ;
Rigonatti, SP ;
Silva, MTA ;
Paulus, W ;
Pascual-Leone, A .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 166 (01) :23-30
[24]   Cognitive effects of repeated sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with depression [J].
Fregni, Felipe ;
Boggio, Paulo S. ;
Nitsche, Michael A. ;
Rigonatti, Sergio P. ;
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro .
DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2006, 23 (08) :482-484
[25]   Direct Current Stimulation Promotes BDNF-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity: Potential Implications for Motor Learning [J].
Fritsch, Brita ;
Reis, Janine ;
Martinowich, Ken ;
Schambra, Heidi M. ;
Ji, Yuanyuan ;
Cohen, Leonardo G. ;
Lu, Bai .
NEURON, 2010, 66 (02) :198-204
[26]   Alternating Current Stimulation for Vision Restoration after Optic Nerve Damage: A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Gall, Carolin ;
Schmidt, Sein ;
Schittkowski, Michael P. ;
Antal, Andrea ;
Ambrus, Geza Gergely ;
Paulus, Walter ;
Dannhauer, Moritz ;
Michalik, Romualda ;
Mante, Alf ;
Bola, Michal ;
Lux, Anke ;
Kropf, Siegfried ;
Brandt, Stephan A. ;
Sabel, Bernhard A. .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06)
[27]   Transcranial DC stimulation (OCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation [J].
Gandiga, PC ;
Hummel, FC ;
Cohen, LG .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (04) :845-850
[28]   Evaluating the performance of the quick CSF method in detecting contrast sensitivity function changes [J].
Hou, Fang ;
Lesmes, Luis Andres ;
Kim, Woojae ;
Gu, Hairong ;
Pitt, Mark A. ;
Myung, Jay I. ;
Lu, Zhong-Lin .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2016, 16 (06)
[29]   Using 10AFC to further improve the efficiency of the quick CSF method [J].
Hou, Fang ;
Lesmes, Luis ;
Bex, Peter ;
Dorr, Michael ;
Lu, Zhong-Lin .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2015, 15 (09)
[30]   qCSF in Clinical Application: Efficient Characterization and Classification of Contrast Sensitivity Functions in Amblyopia [J].
Hou, Fang ;
Huang, Chang-Bing ;
Lesmes, Luis ;
Feng, Li-Xia ;
Tao, Liming ;
Zhou, Yi-Feng ;
Lu, Zhong-Lin .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (10) :5365-5377