Comparing environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy - A life cycle perspective

被引:141
作者
De Vries, J. W. [1 ]
Vinken, T. M. W. J. [1 ]
Hamelin, L. [2 ]
De Boer, I. J. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Wageningen UR Livestock Res, NL-6700 AC Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ So Denmark, Inst Chem Engn Biotechnol & Environm Technol KBM, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
[3] Wageningen Univ, Anim Prod Syst Grp, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Consequential LCA; Pig slurry; Renewable energy; Indirect land use change; Greenhouse gases; EMISSIONS; BIOENERGY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.124
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The aim of this work was to assess the environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy, from a life cycle perspective. This included assessing environmental impacts and land use change emissions (LUC) required to replace used co-substrates for anaerobic digestion. Environmental impact categories considered were climate change, terrestrial acidification, marine and freshwater eutrophication, particulate matter formation, land use, and fossil fuel depletion. Six scenarios were evaluated: mono-digestion of manure, co-digestion with: maize silage, maize silage and glycerin, beet tails, wheat yeast concentrate (WYC), and roadside grass. Mono-digestion reduced most impacts, but represented a limited source for bio-energy. Co-digestion with maize silage, beet tails, and WYC (competing with animal feed), and glycerin increased bio-energy production (up to 568%), but at expense of increasing climate change (through LUC), marine eutrophication, and land use. Co-digestion with wastes or residues like roadside grass gave the best environmental performance. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 248
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Methane production through anaerobic digestion of various energy crops grown in sustainable crop rotations [J].
Amon, Thomas ;
Amon, Barbara ;
Kryvoruchko, Vitally ;
Machmueller, Andrea ;
Hopfner-Sixt, Katharina ;
Bodiroza, Vitomir ;
Hrbek, Regina ;
Friedel, Juergen ;
Poetsch, Erich ;
Wagentristl, Helmut ;
Schreiner, Matthias ;
Zollitsch, Werner .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 98 (17) :3204-3212
[2]   Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems -: Part II:: The environmental impact of replacing various reference systems [J].
Borjesson, Pal ;
Berglund, Maria .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2007, 31 (05) :326-344
[3]  
Brinkman A. F., 2004, HERZIENING LEVENSCYC
[4]   Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: State of the art and future challenges [J].
Cherubini, Francesco ;
Stromman, Anders Hammer .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (02) :437-451
[5]   Variability in environmental impacts of Brazilian soybean according to crop production and transport scenarios [J].
da Silva, Vamilson Prudencio ;
van der Werf, Hayo M. G. ;
Spies, Airton ;
Soares, Sebastiao Roberto .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 91 (09) :1831-1839
[6]   LCA of soybean meal [J].
Dalgaard, Randi ;
Schmidt, Jannick ;
Halberg, Niels ;
Christensen, Per ;
Thrane, Mikkel ;
Pengue, Walter A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2008, 13 (03) :240-254
[7]   Environmental consequences of processing manure to produce mineral fertilizer and bio-energy [J].
De Vries, J. W. ;
Groenestein, C. M. ;
De Boer, I. J. M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 102 :173-183
[8]  
Dekker P.H.M., 2009, LEVENSCYCLUSANALYSE
[9]  
DR, 2012, REG US ORG MAN DIENS
[10]  
Duynie, 2008, TARW PROD