Comparing environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy - A life cycle perspective

被引:140
作者
De Vries, J. W. [1 ]
Vinken, T. M. W. J. [1 ]
Hamelin, L. [2 ]
De Boer, I. J. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Wageningen UR Livestock Res, NL-6700 AC Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ So Denmark, Inst Chem Engn Biotechnol & Environm Technol KBM, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
[3] Wageningen Univ, Anim Prod Syst Grp, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Consequential LCA; Pig slurry; Renewable energy; Indirect land use change; Greenhouse gases; EMISSIONS; BIOENERGY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.124
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The aim of this work was to assess the environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy, from a life cycle perspective. This included assessing environmental impacts and land use change emissions (LUC) required to replace used co-substrates for anaerobic digestion. Environmental impact categories considered were climate change, terrestrial acidification, marine and freshwater eutrophication, particulate matter formation, land use, and fossil fuel depletion. Six scenarios were evaluated: mono-digestion of manure, co-digestion with: maize silage, maize silage and glycerin, beet tails, wheat yeast concentrate (WYC), and roadside grass. Mono-digestion reduced most impacts, but represented a limited source for bio-energy. Co-digestion with maize silage, beet tails, and WYC (competing with animal feed), and glycerin increased bio-energy production (up to 568%), but at expense of increasing climate change (through LUC), marine eutrophication, and land use. Co-digestion with wastes or residues like roadside grass gave the best environmental performance. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 248
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Methane production through anaerobic digestion of various energy crops grown in sustainable crop rotations
    Amon, Thomas
    Amon, Barbara
    Kryvoruchko, Vitally
    Machmueller, Andrea
    Hopfner-Sixt, Katharina
    Bodiroza, Vitomir
    Hrbek, Regina
    Friedel, Juergen
    Poetsch, Erich
    Wagentristl, Helmut
    Schreiner, Matthias
    Zollitsch, Werner
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 98 (17) : 3204 - 3212
  • [2] Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems -: Part II:: The environmental impact of replacing various reference systems
    Borjesson, Pal
    Berglund, Maria
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2007, 31 (05) : 326 - 344
  • [3] Brinkman A. F., 2004, HERZIENING LEVENSCYC
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: State of the art and future challenges
    Cherubini, Francesco
    Stromman, Anders Hammer
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (02) : 437 - 451
  • [5] Variability in environmental impacts of Brazilian soybean according to crop production and transport scenarios
    da Silva, Vamilson Prudencio
    van der Werf, Hayo M. G.
    Spies, Airton
    Soares, Sebastiao Roberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 91 (09) : 1831 - 1839
  • [6] LCA of soybean meal
    Dalgaard, Randi
    Schmidt, Jannick
    Halberg, Niels
    Christensen, Per
    Thrane, Mikkel
    Pengue, Walter A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2008, 13 (03) : 240 - 254
  • [7] Environmental consequences of processing manure to produce mineral fertilizer and bio-energy
    De Vries, J. W.
    Groenestein, C. M.
    De Boer, I. J. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 102 : 173 - 183
  • [8] Dekker P.H.M., 2009, LEVENSCYCLUSANALYSE
  • [9] DR, 2012, REG US ORG MAN DIENS
  • [10] Duynie, 2008, TARW PROD