Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of the Corneal Endothelium With Smartphone Specular Microscopy

被引:11
作者
Fliotsos, Michael J. [1 ]
Deljookorani, Shiva [2 ]
Dzhaber, Daliya [1 ]
Chandan, Subhangi [3 ]
Ighani, Mehrnaz [4 ]
Eghrari, Allen O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Wilmer Eye Inst, Div Cornea Cataract & External Dis, 600 N Wolfe St,Woods 375, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Catonsville, MD USA
[3] Maulana Azad Med Coll, New Delhi, India
[4] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
smartphones; specular microscopy; corneal imaging; specular microscope; corneal endothelium; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0000000000002277
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of a lower-cost, portable method for qualitative and quantitative analysis of the corneal endothelium using a smartphone and slit-lamp biomicroscope. Methods: In this study, at a single academic center, we recruited healthy participants to undergo imaging of the corneal endothelium using both a smartphone-based method and a specular microscope. Participants first had their eyes imaged with a CellChek NSP-9900 Specular Microscope (Konan Medical, Inc, Irvine, CA). For image capture on the smartphone, a beam of light approximately 0.2 mm in diameter was directed to the center of the cornea with a slit-lamp biomicroscope to achieve specular reflection. With 40x zoom on the slit-lamp and 4K video mode set on an iPhone 7 Plus held to an ocular, the corneal endothelium was recorded until the hexagonal pattern of cells was identified and the sharpest frame from the video was selected. Results: The videos were analyzed from 14 sets of eyes (average length 2 minutes 40 seconds). The average intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.82). The mean difference between smartphone endothelial cell count and specular endothelial cell count was -209 cells/mm(2)(SD = 483 cells/mm(2)), which did not achieve significance (P= 0.14). A Bland-Altman analysis with simple linear regression showed no proportional bias when comparing the 2 modalities (coefficient = -0.20;t-value = -0.42;P= 0.68). Conclusions: Smartphone specular microscopy is capable of qualitative and quantitative analysis of the corneal endothelium. Further refinement to standardize the light source and automate analysis will increase feasibility.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 929
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SMARTPHONE OWNERSHIP
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]  
Bonnell AJ., 2012, SPEC MICR REV OPT WE
[4]  
Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 1992, NAT COV DET NCD END
[5]   Automated segmentation of the corneal endothelium in a large set of 'real-world' specular microscopy images using the U-Net architecture [J].
Daniel, Moritz C. ;
Atzrodt, Lisa ;
Bucher, Felicitas ;
Wacker, Katrin ;
Bohringer, Stefan ;
Reinhard, Thomas ;
Boehringer, Daniel .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
[6]   Fuchs' corneal dystrophy [J].
Eghrari, Allen O. ;
Gottsch, John D. .
EXPERT REVIEW OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 5 (02) :147-159
[7]   Comparison of corneal endothelial cell measurements by two non-contact specular microscopes [J].
Gasser, Laura ;
Reinhard, Thomas ;
Boeringer, Daniel .
BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 15
[8]   Corneal guttata: a comparative clinical and specular micrographic study [J].
Jackson, AJ ;
Robinson, FO ;
Frazer, DG ;
Archer, DB .
EYE, 1999, 13 (6) :737-743
[9]   Prevalence of Corneal Dystrophies in the United States: Estimates from Claims Data [J].
Musch, David C. ;
Niziol, Leslie M. ;
Stein, Joshua D. ;
Kamyar, Roheena M. ;
Sugar, Alan .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2011, 52 (09) :6959-6963
[10]  
Research2guidance, 2013, MOB HLTH MARK TRENDS