Developing a Text-Integration Task for Investigating and Teaching Interdisciplinarity in Science Teams

被引:2
作者
Knight, Simon [1 ]
Thompson, Kate [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Interdisciplinarity; Synthesis; Writing; Text integration; Science teams; Epistemic; Cognition; COMPREHENSION; INFORMATION; WORK;
D O I
10.1007/s11165-020-09937-7
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Integrating information from across multiple sources is an important science literacy skill that involves the following: identifying intra- and intertextual ties, modeling relationships between sources and claims and making an evaluation of the claims made. Tasks that involve reading, interpreting and synthesizing multiple sources have been well explored particularly in the epistemic cognition literature. Interdisciplinarity is a growing area of interest in science education, in terms of the ways we induct students into interdisciplinary ways of thinking and working, including the synthesis of knowledge from across scientific disciplines. While interdisciplinary contexts frequently involve connecting multiple sources from different disciplines, how students complete these text-integration tasks has not been well investigated. This paper develops a model of interdisciplinary text integration for science literacy, drawing on dimensions of epistemic cognition. We exemplify the application of this approach in a specific case of environmental science graduate students, drawing on student syntheses to illustrate how our approach can be used to differentiate between students' written syntheses.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 203
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents
    Anmarkrud, Oistein
    Braten, Ivar
    Stromso, Helge I.
    [J]. LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 30 : 64 - 76
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, PISA 2015 Draft Reading Literacy Framework
  • [3] Bammer G, 2013, DISCIPLINING INTERDISCIPLINARITY: INTEGRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCES FOR RESEARCHING COMPLEX REAL-WORLD PROBLEMS, P1
  • [4] Learning to integrate divergent information sources: the interplay of epistemic cognition and epistemic metacognition
    Barzilai, Sarit
    Ka'adan, Ibtisam
    [J]. METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2017, 12 (02) : 193 - 232
  • [5] The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints
    Barzilai, Sarit
    Eshet-Alkalai, Yoram
    [J]. LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2015, 36 : 86 - 103
  • [6] Borrego M, 2010, REV HIGH EDUC, V34, P61
  • [7] Braten I., 2008, Knowing, Knowledge and Beliefs, P351
  • [8] ESTABLISHING TRUSTWORTHINESS WHEN STUDENTS READ MULTIPLE DOCUMENTS CONTAINING CONFLICTING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE
    Braten, Ivar
    Braasch, Jason L. G.
    Stromso, Helge I.
    Ferguson, Leila E.
    [J]. READING PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 36 (04) : 315 - 349
  • [9] The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in the Comprehension of Multiple Expository Texts: Toward an Integrated Model
    Braten, Ivar
    Britt, M. Anne
    Stromso, Helge I.
    Rouet, Jean-Francois
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2011, 46 (01) : 48 - 70
  • [10] Britt M.A., 2012, Enhancing the quality of learning, P276, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139048224.017