Screening and case finding for major depressive disorder using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis

被引:234
作者
Moriarty, Andrew Stephen [1 ]
Gilbody, Simon [1 ]
McMillan, Dean [1 ]
Manea, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
Patient Health Questionnaire; PHQ; PHQ-9; Major depressive disorder; PRIMARY-CARE; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; MENTAL-DISORDERS; PUBLICATION BIAS; VALIDITY; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.06.012
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a widely used screening tool for major depressive disorder (MDD), although there is debate surrounding its diagnostic properties. For the PHQ-9, we aimed to: 1. Establish the diagnostic performance at the standard cutoff point (10). 2. Compare the diagnostic performance at the standard cutoff point in different clinical settings. 3. Assess whether there is selective reporting of cutoff points other than 10. Methods: We searched three databases - Embase, MEDLINE and PSYCHInfo - and performed a reverse citation search in Web of Science. We selected for inclusion studies of any design that assessed the PHQ-9 in adult populations against recognized gold-standard instruments for the diagnosis of either Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or International Classification of Diseases criteria for major depression. Included studies had to report sufficient information to calculate 2*2 contingency tables. Data extraction and synthesis were performed independently by two researchers. For the included studies, we calculated pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, positive likelihood, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio for cutoff points 7 to 15. Results: Thirty-six studies (21,292 patients) met inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity for cutoff point 10 was 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-0.84], and pooled specificity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90). At this cutoff, the PHQ-9 is a better screener in primary care than secondary care settings. No conclusions could be drawn at cutoff points other than 10 due to selective reporting of data. Conclusions: For MDD, the PHQ-9 has acceptable diagnostic properties at cutoff point 10 in different settings. We recommend that future studies report the full range of cutoff points to allow exploration of optimal cutoff points in different settings. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 576
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Psychometrics of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in Uganda: A Systematic Review
    Kaggwa, Mark Mohan
    Najjuka, Sarah Maria
    Ashaba, Scholastic
    Mamun, Mohammed A.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
  • [22] Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression screening in adults with epilepsy
    Rathore, Jaivir S.
    Jehi, Lara E.
    Fan, Youran
    Patel, Sima I.
    Foldvary-Schaefer, Nancy
    Ramirez, Maya J.
    Busch, Robyn M.
    Obuchowski, Nancy A.
    Tesar, George E.
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2014, 37 : 215 - 220
  • [23] Longitudinal epidemiology of major depression as assessed by the Brief Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
    Patten, Scott B.
    Schopflocher, Don
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 50 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [24] Youth screening depression: Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in a representative sample of adolescents
    Fonseca-Pedrero, Eduardo
    Diez-Gomez, Adriana
    Perez-Albeniz, Alicia
    Al-Halabi, Susana
    Lucas-Molina, Beatriz
    Debbane, Martin
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2023, 328
  • [25] Comparing the construct validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) using Rasch analysis
    Christensen, Kaj Sparle
    Sparle-Christensen, Minna
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2023, 333 : 44 - 50
  • [26] Test Review: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
    Blackwell, Terry L.
    McDermott, Amber N.
    REHABILITATION COUNSELING BULLETIN, 2014, 57 (04) : 246 - 248
  • [27] Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): A depression screening tool for people with epilepsy in Vietnam
    Tram Le Hoang Ngoc
    Minh-An Thuy Le
    Hung Thien Nguyen
    Hanh-Vi Vo
    Ngan Quynh Le
    Loc Ngoc Phuong Tang
    Thanh Trung Tran
    Tuan Van Le
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2021, 125
  • [28] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in the general population
    Wang, Wenzheng
    Bian, Qian
    Zhao, Yan
    Li, Xu
    Wang, Wenwen
    Du, Jiang
    Zhang, Guofang
    Zhou, Qing
    Zhao, Min
    GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 36 (05) : 539 - 544
  • [29] Relationship between Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores in older adults with major depressive disorder: An analysis of the OPTIMUM clinical trial
    Kim, Helena K.
    Lenze, Eric J.
    Ainsworth, Nicholas J.
    Blumberger, Daniel M.
    Brownd, Patrick J.
    Flint, Alastair J.
    Karpf, Jordan F.
    Lavretskyg, Helen
    Lenard, Emily
    Miller, J. Philip
    Reynolds, Charles F.
    Roosed, Steven P.
    Mulsanta, Benoit H.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2024, 361 : 651 - 658
  • [30] The Accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Algorithm for Screening to Detect Major Depression: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
    He, Chen
    Levis, Brooke
    Riehm, Kira E.
    Saadat, Nazanin
    Levis, Alexander W.
    Azar, Marleine
    Rice, Danielle B.
    Krishnan, Ankur
    Wu, Yin
    Sun, Ying
    Imran, Mahrukh
    Boruff, Jill
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Gilbody, Simon
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Kloda, Lorie A.
    McMillan, Dean
    Patten, Scott B.
    Shrier, Ian
    Ziegelstein, Roy C.
    Akena, Dickens H.
    Arroll, Bruce
    Ayalon, Liat
    Baradaran, Hamid R.
    Baron, Murray
    Beraldi, Anna
    Bombardier, Charles H.
    Butterworth, Peter
    Carter, Gregory
    Chagas, Marcos Hortes Nisihara
    Chan, Juliana C. N.
    Cholera, Rushina
    Clover, Kerrie
    Conwell, Yeates
    de Man-van Ginkel, Janneke M.
    Fann, Jesse R.
    Fischer, Felix H.
    Fung, Daniel
    Gelaye, Bizu
    Goodyear-Smith, Felicity
    Greeno, Catherine G.
    Hall, Brian J.
    Harrison, Patricia A.
    Harter, Martin
    Hegerl, Ulrich
    Hides, Leanne
    Hobfoll, Stevan E.
    Hudson, Marie
    Hyphantis, Thomas N.
    Inagaki, Masatoshi
    PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2020, 89 (01) : 25 - 37