Screening and case finding for major depressive disorder using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis

被引:234
作者
Moriarty, Andrew Stephen [1 ]
Gilbody, Simon [1 ]
McMillan, Dean [1 ]
Manea, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
Patient Health Questionnaire; PHQ; PHQ-9; Major depressive disorder; PRIMARY-CARE; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; MENTAL-DISORDERS; PUBLICATION BIAS; VALIDITY; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.06.012
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a widely used screening tool for major depressive disorder (MDD), although there is debate surrounding its diagnostic properties. For the PHQ-9, we aimed to: 1. Establish the diagnostic performance at the standard cutoff point (10). 2. Compare the diagnostic performance at the standard cutoff point in different clinical settings. 3. Assess whether there is selective reporting of cutoff points other than 10. Methods: We searched three databases - Embase, MEDLINE and PSYCHInfo - and performed a reverse citation search in Web of Science. We selected for inclusion studies of any design that assessed the PHQ-9 in adult populations against recognized gold-standard instruments for the diagnosis of either Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or International Classification of Diseases criteria for major depression. Included studies had to report sufficient information to calculate 2*2 contingency tables. Data extraction and synthesis were performed independently by two researchers. For the included studies, we calculated pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, positive likelihood, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio for cutoff points 7 to 15. Results: Thirty-six studies (21,292 patients) met inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity for cutoff point 10 was 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-0.84], and pooled specificity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90). At this cutoff, the PHQ-9 is a better screener in primary care than secondary care settings. No conclusions could be drawn at cutoff points other than 10 due to selective reporting of data. Conclusions: For MDD, the PHQ-9 has acceptable diagnostic properties at cutoff point 10 in different settings. We recommend that future studies report the full range of cutoff points to allow exploration of optimal cutoff points in different settings. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 576
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis
    Manea, Laura
    Gilbody, Simon
    McMillan, Dean
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2012, 184 (03) : E191 - E196
  • [2] Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis
    Levis, Brooke
    Benedetti, Andrea
    Thombs, Brett D.
    Akena, Dickens H.
    Arroll, Bruce
    Ayalon, Liat
    Azar, Marleine
    Baradaran, Hamid R.
    Baron, Murray
    Bombardier, Charles H.
    Boruff, Jill
    Butterworth, Peter
    Carter, Gregory
    Chagas, Marcos H.
    Chan, Juliana C. N.
    Chiovitti, Matthew J.
    Clover, Kerrie
    Conwell, Yeates
    Cuijpers, Pim
    de Man-van Ginkel, Janneke M.
    Delgadillo, Jaime
    Fann, Jesse R.
    Fischer, Felix H.
    Fung, Daniel
    Gelaye, Bizu
    Gilbody, Simon
    Goodyear-Smith, Felicity
    Greeno, Catherine G.
    Hall, Brian J.
    Hambridge, John
    Harrison, Patricia A.
    Harter, Martin
    Hegerl, Ulrich
    Hides, Leanne
    Hobfoll, Stevan E.
    Hudson, Marie
    Inagaki, Masatoshi
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Ismail, Khalida
    Jette, Nathalie
    Khamseh, Mohammad E.
    Kiely, Kim M.
    Kloda, Lorie A.
    Kwan, Yunxin
    Levis, Alexander W.
    Liu, Shen-Ing
    Lotrakul, Manote
    Loureiro, Sonia R.
    Lowe, Bernd
    Marsh, Laura
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 365
  • [3] Screening depressive episodes in adolescents. Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
    Borghero, Francesca
    Martinez, Vania
    Zitko, Pedro
    Vohringer, Paul A.
    Cavada, Gabriel
    Rojas, Graciela
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2018, 146 (04) : 479 - 486
  • [4] A diagnostic meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression
    Manea, Laura
    Gilbody, Simon
    McMillan, Dean
    GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 37 (01) : 67 - 75
  • [5] Psychometric characteristics of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
    Saldiviala, Sandra
    Aslan, Joseph
    Cova, Felix
    Vicente, Benjamin
    Inostrozala, Carolina
    Rincon, Paulina
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2019, 147 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [6] The reliability and validity of PHQ-9 in patients with major depressive disorder in psychiatric hospital
    Sun, Yue
    Fu, Zhaoyan
    Bo, Qijing
    Mao, Zhen
    Ma, Xin
    Wang, Chuanyue
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [7] Screening for depression in primary care with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9): A systematic review
    Costantini, Luigi
    Pasquarella, Cesira
    Odone, Anna
    Colucci, Maria Eugenia
    Costanza, Alessandra
    Serafini, Gianluca
    Aguglia, Andrea
    Murri, Martino Belvederi
    Brakoulias, Vlasios
    Amore, Mario
    Ghaemi, S. Nassir
    Amerio, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2021, 279 : 473 - 483
  • [8] Screening for Major Depressive Disorder with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9 and PHQ-2) in an Outpatient Clinic Staffed by Primary Care Physicians in Japan: A Case Control Study
    Suzuki, Keiko
    Kumei, Shima
    Ohhira, Masumi
    Nozu, Tsukasa
    Okumura, Toshikatsu
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03):
  • [9] Comparison of the Usefulness of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 for Screening for Major Depressive Disorder: Analysis of Psychiatric Outpatient Data
    Shin, Cheolmin
    Lee, Seung-Hoon
    Han, Kyu-Man
    Yoon, Ho-Kyoung
    Han, Changsu
    PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2019, 16 (04) : 300 - 305
  • [10] Validation and calibration of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) in Argentina
    Urtasun, Maria
    Manuel Daray, Federico
    Leandro Teti, German
    Coppolillo, Fernando
    Herlax, Gabriela
    Saba, Guillermo
    Rubinstein, Adolfo
    Araya, Ricardo
    Irazola, Vilma
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 19 (01)