Machiavellian Ways to Academic Cheating: A Mediational and Interactional Model

被引:35
作者
Barbaranelli, Claudio [1 ]
Farnese, Maria L. [1 ]
Tramontano, Carlo [2 ]
Fida, Roberta [3 ]
Ghezzi, Valerio [1 ]
Paciello, Marinella [4 ]
Long, Philip [5 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Psychol, Rome, Italy
[2] Coventry Univ, Ctr Adv Behav Sci, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Business Sch, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[4] Univ Telemat Int Uninettuno, Fac Psychol, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ East Anglia, Ctr Staff & Educ Dev, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
Machiavellianism; academic cheating; moral disengagement; approach to learning; normative cheating; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS; DARK TRIAD TRAITS; MORAL DISENGAGEMENT; PROCESS QUESTIONNAIRE; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; FIT INDEXES; DISHONESTY; PERSONALITY; ATTITUDES; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00695
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Academic cheating has become a pervasive practice from primary schools to university. This study aims at investigating this phenomenon through a nomological network which integrates different theoretical frameworks and models, such as trait and social-cognitive theories and models regarding the approaches to learning and contextual/normative environment. Results on a sample of more than 200 Italian university students show that the Amoral Manipulation facet of Machiavellianism, Academic Moral Disengagement, Deep Approach to Learning, and Normative Academic Cheating are significantly associated with Individual Academic Cheating. Moreover, results show a significant latent interaction effect between Normative Academic Cheating and Amoral Manipulation Machiavellianism: "amoral Machiavellians" students are more prone to resort to Academic Cheating in contexts where Academic Cheating is adopted as a practice by their peers, while this effect is not significant in contexts where Academic Cheating is not normative. Results also show that Academic Moral Disengagement and Deep Approach to learning partially mediate the relationship between Amoral Manipulation and Academic Cheating. Practical implications of these results are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, INC
[2]   ACHIEVEMENT GOALS IN THE CLASSROOM - STUDENTS LEARNING-STRATEGIES AND MOTIVATION PROCESSES [J].
AMES, C ;
ARCHER, J .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 80 (03) :260-267
[3]   Motivation and cheating during early adolescence [J].
Anderman, EM ;
Griesinger, T ;
Westerfield, G .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 90 (01) :84-93
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ACAD MANAG LEARN EDU
[5]  
[Anonymous], EDN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1978, THE SOCIAL PSYCHOLOG
[7]  
Arbuckle J.L., 1996, ADV STRUCTURAL EQUAT, P243, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315827414
[9]   A General Approach to Representing Multifaceted Personality Constructs: Application to State Self-Esteem [J].
Bagozzi, Richard P. ;
Heatherton, Todd F. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1994, 1 (01) :35-67
[10]   Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational orientations: Their role in university adjustment, stress, well-being, and subsequent academic performance [J].
Baker, SR .
CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 23 (03) :189-202