Evaluation of the Xiamen AmonMed Biotechnology rapid diagnostic test COVID-19 IgM/IgG test kit (Colloidal gold)

被引:5
|
作者
Doerschug, Anja [1 ]
Schwanbeck, Julian [1 ]
Hahn, Andreas [2 ]
Hillebrecht, Anke [3 ]
Blaschke, Sabine [3 ]
Gross, Uwe [1 ]
Heimesaat, Markus M. [4 ]
Frickmann, Hagen [2 ,5 ]
Zautner, Andreas E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Inst Med Microbiol, Kreuzbergring 57, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Med Rostock, Inst Med Microbiol Virol & Hyg, Rostock, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Interdisciplinary Emergency Dept, Gottingen, Germany
[4] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Microbiol & Hyg, Berlin, Germany
[5] Bundeswehr Hosp Hamburg, Dept Microbiol & Hosp Hyg, Hamburg, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY | 2020年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; rapid diagnostic testing; point-of-care testing; surveillance; serology; epidemiology; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1556/1886.2020.00029
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Introduction: To efficiently monitor the COVID-19 pandemic for surveillance purposes, reliable serological rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are desirable for settings where well-established high-throughput bench-top solutions are not available. Here, we have evaluated such an RDT. Methods: We have assessed the Xiamen AmonMed Biotechnology COVID-19 IgM/IgG test kit (Colloidal gold) and the EUROIMMUN benchtop assay with serum samples from patients with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 disease. Samples from patients with Epstein-Barr-virus (EBV) infection and blood donors were used for specificity testing. Results: For the colloid gold rapid test and the EUROIMMUN assay, the study indicated overall sensitivity of 15.2% and 67.4%, respectively, while specificity of 99.0% and 97.9% with the blood donor sera, as well as 100% and 96.8% with the EBV-patients, were observed, respectively. An association of the time period between positive PCR results and serum acquisition with serological test positivity could be observed for the immunologlobulin G subclass of the EUROIMMUN assay only. Conclusions: In spite of acceptable specificity of the assessed RDT, the detected poor sensitivity leaves room for improvement. The test results remain difficult to interpret and therefore the RDT can currently not be recommended for routine diagnostic or surveillance use.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 185
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test from Orient Gene Biotech
    Delliere, Sarah
    Salmona, Maud
    Minier, Marine
    Gabassi, Audrey
    Alanio, Alexandre
    Le Goff, Jerome
    Delaugerre, Constance
    Chaix, Marie-Laure
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (08)
  • [2] Diagnostic accuracy of Augurix COVID-19 IgG serology rapid test
    Andrey, Diego O.
    Cohen, Patrick
    Meyer, Benjamin
    Torriani, Giulia
    Yerly, Sabine
    Mazza, Lena
    Calame, Adrien
    Arm-Vernez, Isabelle
    Guessous, Idris
    Stringhini, Silvia
    Roux-Lombard, Pascale
    Fontao, Lionel
    Agoritsas, Thomas
    Stirnemann, Jerome
    Reny, Jean-Luc
    Siegrist, Claire-Anne
    Eckerle, Isabella
    Kaiser, Laurent
    Vuilleumier, Nicolas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2020, 50 (10)
  • [3] Rapid Detection of COVID-19 by Serological Methods and the Evaluation of Diagnostic Efficacy of IgM and IgG
    Huang, Shuang
    Lin, Chenyao
    Yan, Mingzhe
    Li, Hongze
    Liu, Ting
    Michael, White
    Xiang, Jie
    Shen, Changxin
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2020, 66 (11) : 2327 - 2333
  • [4] Evaluation of the diagnostic test for rapid detection of covid-19 antigen (Panbio Covid rapid test) in primary care
    Cortes Rubio, J. A.
    Costa Zamora, M. P.
    Canals Aracil, M.
    Pulgar Feio, M.
    Mata Martinez, A.
    Carrasco Munera, A.
    MEDICINA DE FAMILIA-SEMERGEN, 2021, 47 (08): : 508 - 514
  • [5] Clinical Evaluation of Commercial HARDSON COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test Kit for Routine COVID-19 Diagnosis
    Kakhki, Reza Kamali
    Neshani, Alireza
    Kakhki, Mohammad Kamali
    Zare, Hosna
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 5 (02): : 113 - 117
  • [6] A comparative evaluation between the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid test device and Abbott Architect™ SARS CoV-2 IgG assay
    Batra, Rahul
    Olivieri, Luis Gonzalez
    Rubin, Delfin
    Vallari, Ana
    Pearce, Sandra
    Olivo, Ana
    Prostko, John
    Nebbia, Gaia
    Douthwaite, Sam
    Rodgers, Mary
    Cloherty, Gavin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 132
  • [7] Evaluation of the COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test
    Sanli, Ozlem Oguc
    Kuscu, Ozlem Ozkan
    Incekas, Caner
    FLORA INFEKSIYON HASTALIKLARI VE KLINIK MIKROBIYOLOJI DERGISI, 2023, 28 (03): : 489 - 495
  • [8] Clinical Significance of an IgM and IgG Test for Diagnosis of Highly Suspected COVID-19
    Jia, Xingwang
    Zhang, Pengjun
    Tian, Yaping
    Wang, Junli
    Zeng, Huadong
    Wang, Jun
    Liu, Jiao
    Chen, Zeyan
    Zhang, Lijun
    He, Haihong
    He, Kunlun
    Liu, Yajie
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [9] Diagnostic performance of seven rapid IgG/IgM antibody tests and the Euroimmun IgA/IgG ELISA in COVID-19 patients
    Van Elslande, J.
    Houben, E.
    Depypere, M.
    Brackenier, A.
    Desmet, S.
    Andre, E.
    Van Ranst, M.
    Lagrou, K.
    Vermeersch, P.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2020, 26 (08) : 1082 - 1087
  • [10] Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19
    Okoye, Ginette A.
    Kamara, Haja, I
    Strobeck, Michelle
    Mellman, Thomas Alan
    Kwagyan, John
    Sullivan, Ava
    Byrd, Angel S.
    Shokrani, Babak
    Mighty, Hugh E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2022, 147