Bibliometric characteristics of systematic reviews in dermatology: A cross-sectional study through Web of Science and Scopus

被引：18

作者：

Manriquez, Juan ^{[1
]}

Andino-Navarrete, Romina ^{[1
]}

Cataldo-Cerda, Karina ^{[1
]}

Harz-Fresno, Isidora ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Dermatol, Santiago, Chile

[2] Dr Luis Tisne Brousse Hosp, Santiago, Chile

来源：

DERMATOLOGICA SINICA | 2015年 / 33卷 / 03期

关键词：

evidence-based dermatology; systematic reviews;

D O I：

10.1016/j.dsi.2014.12.007

中图分类号：

R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];

学科分类号：

100206 ;

摘要：

The bibliometric characteristics of systematic reviews (SRs) in dermatology are unknown. We analyzed a group of 309 SRs using Scopus and the ISI Web of Science. These 309 SRs were published between 2008 and 2012 in journals with a median journal impact factor of 3.63; 48.2% (n = 149) included meta-analysis, 11.6% (n = 36) were Cochrane reviews, and 76.7% (n = 237) summarized enough evidence to inform clinical decisions. The most common country of origin was the USA (n = 66, 21.4%), and the most frequently studied disease was psoriasis (n = 50, 16.2%). Copyright (C) 2015, Taiwanese Dermatological Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：154 / 156

页数：3

共 10 条

[1] Survey of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in ophthalmology [J].

Chen, Haoyu ;

Jhanji, Vishal .

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 96 (06) :896-899

[2] Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodotogically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatotogy [J].

Collier, A. ;

Heilig, L. ;

Schilling, L. ;

Williams, H. ;

Dellavalle, R. P. .

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 155 (06) :1230-1235

[3]

Davila-Seijo P, 2013, ACTAS DERMO-SIFILOGR, V104, P679, DOI [10.1016/j.adengl.2012.12.009, 10.1016/j.ad.2012.12.018]

[4] Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality [J].

Fleming, Padhraig S. ;

Koletsi, Despina ;

Seehra, Jadbinder ;

Pandis, Nikolaos .

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (07) :754-759

[5] Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals [J].

Kulkarni, Abhaya V. ;

Aziz, Brittany ;

Shams, Iffat ;

Busse, Jason W. .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (10) :1092-1096

[6] Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews [J].

Moher, David ;

Tetzlaff, Jennifer ;

Tricco, Andrea C. ;

Sampson, Margaret ;

Altman, Douglas G. .

PLOS MEDICINE, 2007, 4 (03) :447-455

[7]

Moher D, 2009, PLOS MED, V6, DOI [10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299, 10.1136/bmj.b2535]

[8] What is the point of databases of reviews for dermatology if all they compile is "insufficient evidence"? [J].

Parker, ER ;

Schilling, LM ;

Diba, V ;

Williams, HC ;

Dellavalle, RP .

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 50 (04) :635-639

[9] Quality-assessed reviews of health care interventions and the database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness (DARE) [J].

Petticrew, M ;

Song, F ;

Wilson, P ;

Wright, K .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 15 (04) :671-678

[10] The Growth of Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews in Informing Dermatological Patient Care [J].

Williams, Hywel C. ;

Dellavalle, Robert P. .

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 132 (03) :1008-1017

← 1 →