The Right Direction Needed to Develop White-Box Deep Learning in Radiology, Pathology, and Ophthalmology: A Short Review

被引:21
作者
Hayashi, Yoichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Meiji Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
deep learning; white box; interpretability; transparency; rule extraction; radiology; pathology; black box; CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; RULE EXTRACTION; CLASSIFICATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.3389/frobt.2019.00024
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The popularity of deep learning (DL) in the machine learning community has been dramatically increasing since 2012. The theoretical foundations of DL are well-rooted in the classical neural network (NN). Rule extraction is not a new concept, but was originally devised for a shallow NN. For about the past 30 years, extensive efforts have been made by many researchers to resolve the "black box" problem of trained shallow NNs using rule extraction technology. A rule extraction technology that is well-balanced between accuracy and interpretability has recently been proposed for shallow NNs as a promising means to address this black box problem. Recently, we have been confronting a "new black box" problem caused by highly complex deep NNs (DNNs) generated by DL. In this paper, we first review four rule extraction approaches to resolve the black box problem of DNNs trained by DL in computer vision. Next, we discuss the fundamental limitations and criticisms of current DL approaches in radiology, pathology, and ophthalmology from the black box point of view. We also review the conversion methods from DNNs to decision trees and point out their limitations. Furthermore, we describe a transparent approach for resolving the black box problem of DNNs trained by a deep belief network. Finally, we provide a brief description to realize the transparency of DNNs generated by a convolutional NN and discuss a practical way to realize the transparency of DL in radiology, pathology, and ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Breast cancer classification using deep belief networks [J].
Abdel-Zaher, Ahmed M. ;
Eldeib, Ayman M. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2016, 46 :139-144
[2]   Survey and critique of techniques for extracting rules from trained artificial neural networks [J].
Andrews, R ;
Diederich, J ;
Tickle, AB .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 1995, 8 (06) :373-389
[3]  
[Anonymous], ADV NEURAL INFORM PR
[4]  
[Anonymous], ADV NEURAL INFORM PR
[5]  
[Anonymous], NEURAL RANDOM FOREST
[6]  
Bologna G, 2001, Int J Neural Syst, V11, P247, DOI 10.1016/S0129-0657(01)00068-0
[7]  
Bologna G, 2017, J ARTIF INTELL SOFT, V7, P265, DOI 10.1515/jaiscr-2017-0019
[8]  
Bologna G, 2016, IEEE IJCNN, P668, DOI 10.1109/IJCNN.2016.7727264
[9]   False-negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses [J].
Chan, Carlos H. F. ;
Coopey, Suzanne B. ;
Freer, Phoebe E. ;
Hughes, Kevin S. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 153 (03) :699-702
[10]  
Craven MW, 1996, ADV NEUR IN, V8, P24