Explanation Fiends and Foes: How Mechanistic Detail Determines Understanding and Preference

被引:56
作者
Fernbach, Philip M. [1 ]
Sloman, Steven A. [2 ]
St Louis, Robert [2 ]
Shube, Julia N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Leeds Sch Business, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
COMPARATIVE IGNORANCE; COGNITIVE REFLECTION; SUBJECTIVE KNOWLEDGE; AMBIGUITY AVERSION; INFORMATION; PERSUASION; NEED; PERCEPTIONS; INVOLVEMENT; HEURISTICS;
D O I
10.1086/667782
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
People differ in their threshold for satisfactory causal understanding and therefore in the type of explanation that will engender understanding and maximize the appeal of a novel product. Explanation fiends are dissatisfied with surface understanding and desire detailed mechanistic explanations of how products work. In contrast, explanation foes derive less understanding from detailed than coarse explanations and downgrade products that are explained in detail. Consumers' attitude toward explanation is predicted by their tendency to deliberate, as measured by the cognitive reflection test. Cognitive reflection also predicts susceptibility to the illusion of explanatory depth, the unjustified belief that one understands how things work. When explanation foes attempt to explain, it exposes the illusion, which leads to a decrease in willingness to pay. In contrast, explanation fiends are willing to pay more after generating explanations. We hypothesize that those low in cognitive reflection are explanation foes because explanatory detail shatters their illusion of understanding.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1131
页数:17
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]  
Paolacci G, 2010, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V5, P411
[42]   PERSONAL INVOLVEMENT AS A DETERMINANT OF ARGUMENT-BASED PERSUASION [J].
PETTY, RE ;
GOLDMAN, R ;
CACIOPPO, JT .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 41 (05) :847-855
[43]   Making Products Feel Special: When Metacognitive Difficulty Enhances Evaluation [J].
Pocheptsova, Anastasiya ;
Labroo, Aparna A. ;
Dhar, Ravi .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2010, 47 (06) :1059-1069
[44]   COMPREHENSIONS ROLE IN PERSUASION - THE CASE OF ITS MODERATING EFFECT ON THE PERSUASIVE IMPACT OF SOURCE CUES [J].
RATNESHWAR, S ;
CHAIKEN, S .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1991, 18 (01) :52-62
[45]  
Rozenblit L, 2002, COGNITIVE SCI, V26, P521, DOI 10.1016/S0364-0213(02)00078-2
[46]  
Salmon W., 1984, SCI EXPLANATION CAUS
[47]   INFERENCE EFFECTS WITHOUT INFERENCE MAKING - EFFECTS OF MISSING INFORMATION ON DISCOUNTING AND USE OF PRESENTED INFORMATION [J].
SIMMONS, CJ ;
LYNCH, JG .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1991, 17 (04) :477-491
[48]   The empirical case for two systems of reasoning [J].
Sloman, SA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 119 (01) :3-22
[49]  
Sood Sanjay, 2012, J MARKETING IN PRESS
[50]  
Stark J., 2004, ST PETERSBURG T 0724