WHO Knew. How the World Health Organization (WHO) Became a Dangerous Interloper on Workplace Health and Safety and COVID-19

被引:8
作者
O'Neill, Rory [1 ]
机构
[1] Hazards Magazine, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
COVID-19; worker health and safety; WHO; ITUC;
D O I
10.1177/1048291120961337
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The World Health Organization's (WHO) workplace health and safety guidelines on COVID-19 are unacceptably complacent in parts, patently dangerous in others, and contain serious gaps. Omissions include no mention of the essential role of labor inspection and enforcement, and a lack of recognition of potential interactions with other workplace hazards. WHO also omitted discussion of the necessity for wider employment protections to make safety and safe behavior a realistic prospect. Potential risks in outdoor work and the need to address the impact of job segregation related to inequalities in health outcomes are also absent. WHO's advice influences national practice, official guidance, and binding rules.The International Trade Union Confederation has assessed the flaws in WHO's arguments and has prepared a critique so they are understood and can be challenged.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 248
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, The Green Book-Central Government Guidance on Appraisal and Evaluation
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, DAT BRIEF SIL COVID
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, EFF COVID 19 GLOB SU
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, ONS Statistical Bulletin
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, KEEP YOUR DIST IS 2
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, CONSIDERATIONS PUBLI
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, KEY ISSUES RETURN WO
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Social protection for migrant workers: a necessary response to the Covid-19 crisis. ILO Factsheet
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ONS PUBLICATION NOTE
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2020, The Economist