Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation

被引:148
作者
Moussaid, Mehdi [1 ]
Kaemmer, Juliane E. [1 ]
Analytis, Pantelis P. [1 ]
Neth, Hansjoerg [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Ctr Adapt Behav & Cognit, Berlin, Germany
关键词
BOUNDED CONFIDENCE; WISDOM; CROWD; CONSENSUS; PHYSICS; SPREAD; MODELS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0078433
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Social influence is the process by which individuals adapt their opinion, revise their beliefs, or change their behavior as a result of social interactions with other people. In our strongly interconnected society, social influence plays a prominent role in many self-organized phenomena such as herding in cultural markets, the spread of ideas and innovations, and the amplification of fears during epidemics. Yet, the mechanisms of opinion formation remain poorly understood, and existing physics-based models lack systematic empirical validation. Here, we report two controlled experiments showing how participants answering factual questions revise their initial judgments after being exposed to the opinion and confidence level of others. Based on the observation of 59 experimental subjects exposed to peer-opinion for 15 different items, we draw an influence map that describes the strength of peer influence during interactions. A simple process model derived from our observations demonstrates how opinions in a group of interacting people can converge or split over repeated interactions. In particular, we identify two major attractors of opinion: (i) the expert effect, induced by the presence of a highly confident individual in the group, and (ii) the majority effect, caused by the presence of a critical mass of laypeople sharing similar opinions. Additional simulations reveal the existence of a tipping point at which one attractor will dominate over the other, driving collective opinion in a given direction. These findings have implications for understanding the mechanisms of public opinion formation and managing conflicting situations in which self-confident and better informed minorities challenge the views of a large uninformed majority.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1978, Micromotives and Macrobehavior
[2]   OPINIONS AND SOCIAL PRESSURE [J].
ASCH, SE .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1955, 193 (05) :31-35
[3]  
Baron J., 2000, Thinking and deciding
[4]   A THEORY OF FADS, FASHION, CUSTOM, AND CULTURAL-CHANGE AS INFORMATIONAL CASCADES [J].
BIKHCHANDANI, S ;
HIRSHLEIFER, D ;
WELCH, I .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1992, 100 (05) :992-1026
[5]  
Camazine S., 2001, Self-Organization in Biological Systems
[6]   Statistical physics of social dynamics [J].
Castellano, Claudio ;
Fortunato, Santo ;
Loreto, Vittorio .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2009, 81 (02) :591-646
[7]   Uninformed Individuals Promote Democratic Consensus in Animal Groups [J].
Couzin, Iain D. ;
Ioannou, Christos C. ;
Demirel, Gueven ;
Gross, Thilo ;
Torney, Colin J. ;
Hartnett, Andrew ;
Conradt, Larissa ;
Levin, Simon A. ;
Leonard, Naomi E. .
SCIENCE, 2011, 334 (6062) :1578-1580
[8]   Mixing beliefs among interacting agents [J].
Deffuant, G ;
Neau, D ;
Amblard, F ;
Weisbuch, G .
APPLICATIONS OF SIMULATION TO SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2000, :87-98
[9]   Leadership, consensus decision making and collective behaviour in humans [J].
Dyer, John R. G. ;
Johansson, Anders ;
Helbing, Dirk ;
Couzin, Iain D. ;
Krause, Jens .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 364 (1518) :781-789
[10]   Modelling the influence of human behaviour on the spread of infectious diseases: a review [J].
Funk, Sebastian ;
Salathe, Marcel ;
Jansen, Vincent A. A. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2010, 7 (50) :1247-1256