Modelling discontinuities and Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities in SPH

被引:327
作者
Price, Daniel J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Sch Phys, Exeter EX4 4QL, Devon, England
关键词
Hydrodynamics; Methods: numerical; Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH); Kelvin-Helmholtz instability; Contact discontinuities; Artificial surface tension;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcp.2008.08.011
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper we discuss the treatment of discontinuities in smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations. In particular we discuss the difference between integral and differential representations of the fluid equations in an SPH context and how this relates to the formulation of dissipative terms for the capture of shocks and other discontinuities. This has important implications for many problems, in particular related to recently highlighted problems in treating Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities across entropy gradients in SPH. The specific problems pointed out by Agertz et al. [O.Agertz, B. Moore, J. Stadel, D. Potter, F. Miniati, J. Read, L. Mayer, A. Gawryszczak, A. Kravtsov, A. Nordlund, F. Pearce, V. Quilis, D. Rudd, V. Springel, J. Stone, E. Tasker, R. Teyssier, J. Wadsley, R. Walder, Fundamental differences between SPH and grid methods, MNRAS 380 (2007) 963-978] are shown to be related in particular to the (lack of) treatment of contact discontinuities in standard SPH formulations which can be cured by the simple application of an artificial thermal conductivity term. We propose a new formulation of artificial thermal conductivity in SPH which minimises dissipation away from discontinuities and can therefore be applied quite generally in SPH calculations. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10040 / 10057
页数:18
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Fundamental differences between SPH and grid methods [J].
Agertz, Oscar ;
Moore, Ben ;
Stadel, Joachim ;
Potter, Doug ;
Miniati, Francesco ;
Read, Justin ;
Mayer, Lucio ;
Gawryszczak, Artur ;
Kravtosov, Andrey ;
Nordlund, Ake ;
Pearce, Frazer ;
Quilis, Vicent ;
Rudd, Douglas ;
Springel, Volker ;
Stone, James ;
Tasker, Elizabeth ;
Teyssier, Romain ;
Wadsley, James ;
Walder, Rolf .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 380 (03) :963-978
[2]   A METHOD OF CALCULATING RADIATIVE HEAT DIFFUSION IN PARTICLE SIMULATIONS [J].
BROOKSHAW, L .
PROCEEDINGS ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF AUSTRALIA, 1985, 6 (02) :207-210
[3]   Implementations and tests of Godunov-type particle hydrodynamics [J].
Cha, SH ;
Whitworth, AP .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 340 (01) :73-90
[4]  
Choudhuri A. R., 1998, PHYS FLUIDS PLASMAS
[5]   Ultrarelativistic SPH [J].
Chow, E ;
Monaghan, JJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1997, 134 (02) :296-305
[6]   EFFICIENT SOLUTION ALGORITHMS FOR THE RIEMANN PROBLEM FOR REAL GASES [J].
COLELLA, P ;
GLAZ, HM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1985, 59 (02) :264-289
[7]   VARIATION PRINCIPLES OF HYDRODYNAMICS [J].
ECKART, C .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1960, 3 (03) :421-427
[8]   REMOVING THE STIFFNESS FROM INTERFACIAL FLOW WITH SURFACE-TENSION [J].
HOU, TY ;
LOWENGRUB, JS ;
SHELLEY, MJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1994, 114 (02) :312-338
[9]   A multi-phase SPH method for macroscopic and mesoscopic flows [J].
Hu, XY ;
Adams, NA .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2006, 213 (02) :844-861
[10]   Reformulation of smoothed particle hydrodynamics with Riemann solver [J].
Inutsuka, S .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2002, 179 (01) :238-267