Implementation of adaptive methods in early-phase clinical trials

被引:25
作者
Petroni, Gina R. [1 ]
Wages, Nolan A. [1 ]
Paux, Gautier [2 ]
Dubois, Frederic [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Div Translat Res & Appl Stat, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[2] IRIS, Oncol Clin Biostat, F-92284 Suresnes, France
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
dose-finding; adaptive methods; protocol development; CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD; DESIGNS; COMBINATION; THERAPY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/sim.6910
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There has been constant development of novel statistical methods in the design of early-phase clinical trials since the introduction of model-based designs, yet the traditional or modified 3+3 algorithmic design remains the most widely used approach in dose-finding studies. Research has shown the limitations of this traditional design compared with more innovative approaches yet the use of these model-based designs remains infrequent. This can be attributed to several causes including a poor understanding from clinicians and reviewers into how the designs work, and how best to evaluate the appropriateness of a proposed design. These barriers are likely to be enhanced in the coming years as the recent paradigm of drug development involves a shift to more complex dose-finding problems. This article reviews relevant information that should be included in clinical trial protocols to aid in the acceptance and approval of novel methods. We provide practical guidance for implementing these efficient designs with the aim of augmenting a broader transition from algorithmic to adaptive model-guided designs. In addition we highlight issues to consider in the actual implementation of a trial once approval is obtained. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 224
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]   Continual Reassessment and Related Dose-Finding Designs [J].
O'Quigley, John ;
Conaway, Mark .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 25 (02) :202-216
[22]   Statistical controversies in clinical research: requiem for the 3+3 design for phase I trials [J].
Paoletti, X. ;
Ezzalfani, M. ;
Le Tourneau, C. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (09) :1808-1812
[23]   Design efficiency in dose finding studies [J].
Paoletti, X ;
O'Quigley, J ;
Maccario, J .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2004, 45 (02) :197-214
[24]   Operating characteristics of the standard Phase I clinical trial design [J].
Reiner, E ;
Paoletti, X ;
O'Quigley, J .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 1999, 30 (03) :303-315
[25]   Translation of innovative designs into phase I trials [J].
Rogatko, Andre ;
Schoeneck, David ;
Jonas, William ;
Tighiouart, Mourad ;
Khuri, Fadlo R. ;
Porter, Alan .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (31) :4982-4986
[26]   bcrm: Bayesian Continual Reassessment Method Designs for Phase I Dose-Finding Trials [J].
Sweeting, Michael ;
Mander, Adrian ;
Sabin, Tony .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2013, 54 (13) :1-26
[27]   Recent developments in the implementation of novel designs for early-phase combination studies [J].
Wages, N. A. ;
Conaway, M. R. ;
Slingluff, C. L., Jr. ;
Williams, M. E. ;
Portell, C. A. ;
Hwu, P. ;
Petroni, G. R. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (05) :1036-1037
[28]   A Phase I/II adaptive design for heterogeneous groups with application to a stereotactic body radiation therapy trial [J].
Wages, Nolan A. ;
Read, Paul W. ;
Petroni, Gina R. .
PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2015, 14 (04) :302-310
[29]   A Phase I/II adaptive design to determine the optimal treatment regimen from a set of combination immunotherapies in high-risk melanoma [J].
Wages, Nolan A. ;
Slingluff, Craig L., Jr. ;
Petroni, Gina R. .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 41 :172-179
[30]   Performance of two-stage continual reassessment method relative to an optimal benchmark [J].
Wages, Nolan A. ;
Conaway, Mark R. ;
O'Quigley, John .
CLINICAL TRIALS, 2013, 10 (06) :862-875