Meta-analysis: efficacy of small bowel preparation for small bowel video capsule endoscopy

被引:61
作者
Belsey, Jonathan [1 ]
Crosta, Cristiano [2 ]
Epstein, Owen [3 ]
Fischbach, Wolfgang [4 ]
Layer, Peter [5 ]
Parente, Fabrizio [6 ]
Halphen, Marc [7 ]
机构
[1] JB Med Ltd, Sudbury CO10 0PB, Suffolk, England
[2] European Inst Oncol, Div Endoscopy, Milan, Italy
[3] Royal Free Hosp, Ctr Gastroenterol, London NW3 2QG, England
[4] Klinikum Aschaffenburg, Aschaffenburg, Germany
[5] Univ Hamburg, Israelit Hosp, Hamburg, Germany
[6] A Manzoni Hosp, Gastrointestinal Unit, Lecce, Italy
[7] Norgine, Harefield, Middx, England
关键词
Bowel preparation; Capsule endoscopy Meta; analysis; Systematic review; ORAL SODIUM-PHOSPHATE; DIAGNOSTIC YIELD; RECOMMENDATIONS; SIMETHICONE;
D O I
10.1185/03007995.2012.747953
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: It is unclear whether small bowel visibility in video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is enhanced by the use of bowel preparation in addition to pre-procedural fasting. The objective of this study was to clarify this issue by means of a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Methods: Randomised controlled trials comparing the use of laxative bowel preparation with fasting alone were identified using a literature search. Categorical measures of treatment efficacy were extracted from qualifying studies and pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Primary analysis compared any bowel preparation with fasting alone; subsidiary analyses assessed diagnostic yield and results for each regimen. Results: Eight studies were identified, using either polyethylene glycol (PEG) or sodium phosphate (NaP) based regimens. No qualifying studies were identified using other laxatives. Study quality was sufficiently high to warrant meta-analysis. Use of any form of bowel preparation yielded significantly better visibility than fasting alone (OR = 2.31; 95% CI = 1.46-3.63; p<0.0001). Similar results were seen for diagnostic yield (OR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.24-2.84; p = 0.023). When sub-analysed according to the treatment used, PEG-based regimens showed benefit (OR = 3.11; 95% CI = 1.96-4.94; p<0.0001), while NaP-based regimens yielded no significant difference from fasting alone (OR = 1.32; 95% CI = 0.59-2.96; p<0.0001). Limitations: The study did not consider results from retrospective studies, nor those which did not give a categorical measure of efficacy. The impact of prokinetic and other adjunctive treatments was not considered. The results are only relevant to the most commonly used video capsule, as data for newer alternative devices have not yet been published. Conclusion: Based on the results of this analysis, the use of bowel preparation alongside fasting is recommended for VCE. PEG-based regimens offer a clear advantage in these patients, while the currently available evidence base does not support the use of NaP. For VCE, lower volume PEG appears to be as efficacious as higher volumes traditionally used for colonoscopy preparation.
引用
收藏
页码:1883 / 1890
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PILLCAM SB INF HLTH
[2]   Systematic review: adverse event reports for oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol [J].
Belsey, J. ;
Epstein, O. ;
Heresbach, D. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 29 (01) :15-28
[3]   A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease [J].
Costamagna, G ;
Shah, SK ;
Riccioni, ME ;
Foschia, F ;
Mutignani, M ;
Perri, V ;
Vecchioli, A ;
Brizi, MG ;
Picciocchi, A ;
Marano, P .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 123 (04) :999-1005
[4]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[5]   Prospective evaluation of small bowel preparation with bisacodyl and sodium phosphate for capsule endoscopy [J].
Franke, Andreas ;
Hummel, Frank ;
Knebel, Phillip ;
Antoni, Christoph ;
Boecker, Ulrich ;
Singer, Manfred V. ;
Loehr, Matthias .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 14 (13) :2061-2064
[6]   Comparison of two schemes of small bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy with polyethylene glycol: a prospective, randomized single-blind study [J].
Kantianis, Alexandros ;
Karagiannis, Stephanos ;
Liatsos, Christos ;
Galanis, Petros ;
Psilopoulos, Dimitrios ;
Tenta, Roxane ;
Kalantzis, Nikolaos ;
Mavrogiannis, Christos .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 21 (10) :1140-1144
[7]   European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE): Recommendations (2009) on clinical use of video capsule endoscopy to investigate small-bowel, esophageal and colonic diseases [J].
Ladas, S. D. ;
Triantafyllou, K. ;
Spada, C. ;
Riccioni, M. E. ;
Rey, J. -F. ;
Niv, Y. ;
Delvaux, M. ;
de Franchis, R. ;
Costamagna, G. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 42 (03) :220-227
[8]   Capsule endoscopy and bowel preparation with oral sodium phosphate: a prospective randomized controlled trial [J].
Lapalus, Marie-George ;
Ben Soussan, Emmanuel ;
Saurin, Jean-Christophe ;
Favre, Olivier ;
D'Halluin, Pierre Nicolas ;
Coumaros, Dimitri ;
Gaudric, Marianne ;
Fumex, Fabien ;
Antonietti, Michel ;
Gaudin, Jean-Louis ;
Jacob, Philippe ;
Heresbach, Denis ;
Pilichos, Charalambos ;
Fan, Rong ;
Mozer, Marianne ;
Heyries, Laurent ;
Dumortier, Jerome ;
Ponchon, Thierry .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (07) :1091-1096
[9]   Literature review and recommendations for clinical application of small-bowel capsule endoscopy, based on a panel discussion by international experts -: Consensus statements for small-bowel capsule endoscopy, 2006/2007 [J].
Mergener, K. ;
Ponchon, T. ;
Gralnek, I. ;
Pennazio, M. ;
Gay, G. ;
Selby, W. ;
Seidman, E. G. ;
Cellier, C. ;
Murray, J. ;
de Franchis, R. ;
Roesch, T. ;
Lewis, B. S. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 39 (10) :895-909
[10]  
Moher D, 2009, ANN INTERN MED, V151, P264, DOI [10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1]