Chaos and reproduction in sea level

被引:23
作者
De Domenico, Manlio [1 ,2 ]
Ghorbani, Mohammad Ali [3 ]
Makarynskyy, Oleg [4 ]
Makarynska, Dina [4 ]
Asadi, Hakimeh [3 ]
机构
[1] Scuola Super Catania, Lab Sistemi Complessi, I-95123 Catania, Italy
[2] Univ Catania, Dipartimento Fis & Astron, I-95123 Catania, Italy
[3] Tabriz Univ, Dept Water Engn, Tabriz, Iran
[4] URS Australia, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
关键词
Correlation dimension; Lyapunov exponent; Time series; Sea level; Local prediction; ARIMA; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; TIME-SERIES; SATELLITE ALTIMETRY; STRANGE ATTRACTORS; PREDICTABILITY; TOPEX/POSEIDON; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.apm.2012.08.018
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Prediction of sea-level is an important task for navigation, coastal engineering and geodetic applications, as well as recreational activities. This study presents a comparison of Chaos theory and Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) techniques for sea level modelling for daily, weekly, 10-day and monthly time scale at the Cocos (Keeling) islands from 1992 to 2001. The state space reconstruction of the unknown underlying process is directly employed from time series data, through Takens delay embedding method: optimal embedding dimension and delay time are obtained from false nearest neighbours and average mutual information techniques, respectively. Optimal values are then used for the estimation of the correlation dimension and the largest Lyapunov exponent, for inspecting possible signatures of chaotic dynamics. We find a positive Lyapunov exponent an evident feature of chaos. Indeed, the nonlinear prediction of sea level, in the period ranging from January 2001 to December 2001, is in an excellent agreement with the data for the same period, evidencing the nonlinear nature of the process. ARIMA method is also used for sea level modelling, for the same time scales; the performances of the two models are compared using such statistical indices as the root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (CC). The comparative analyses show that the chaos theory model has a slight edge over ARIMA while both models are in principal acceptable. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3687 / 3697
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PHYS REV LETT
[2]   Multivariate autoregressive modelling of sea level time series from TOPEX/Poseidon satellite altimetry [J].
Barbosa, S. M. ;
Silva, M. E. ;
Fernandes, M. J. .
NONLINEAR PROCESSES IN GEOPHYSICS, 2006, 13 (02) :177-184
[3]  
Barbosa S.M., 2008, NONLINEAR TIME SER A, V112, P153
[4]  
Box G.E.P., 1976, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control
[5]   Comparative study of embedding methods [J].
Cellucci, CJ ;
Albano, AM ;
Rapp, PE .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2003, 67 (06) :13
[6]  
Farmer J.D., 1987, EVOLUTION LEARNING C, P277
[7]   INDEPENDENT COORDINATES FOR STRANGE ATTRACTORS FROM MUTUAL INFORMATION [J].
FRASER, AM ;
SWINNEY, HL .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1986, 33 (02) :1134-1140
[8]   Chaos and predictability in ocean water levels [J].
Frison, TW ;
Abarbanel, HDI ;
Earle, MD ;
Schultz, JR ;
Scherer, WD .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1999, 104 (C4) :7935-7951
[9]   CHARACTERIZATION OF STRANGE ATTRACTORS [J].
GRASSBERGER, P ;
PROCACCIA, I .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1983, 50 (05) :346-349
[10]   Practical implementation of nonlinear time series methods: The TISEAN package [J].
Hegger, R ;
Kantz, H ;
Schreiber, T .
CHAOS, 1999, 9 (02) :413-435